Jump to content

Dahobbs

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    19113
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Dahobbs

  1. It has been made very clear that those in power don't believe trans people are human.
  2. Way to not answer the question. Do you think trans people are bad? Do you think trans ideology (whatever the fuck that is) is to blame? If not, then who gives a flying fuck if the roommate is trans? I think you know this whole story is bullshit. Dude was pissed off internet troll and did some real-life trolling. That is all there is to his motive.
  3. So is the trans roomate/lover the hero of this story? Or is trans ideology evil and to blame? I'm confused (because none of that bullshit makes any sense).
  4. The video in the post I was quoting was short, with very specific examples, but each long enough segments to make the context clear. You tell me, do believe that black women lack the brain power to be taken seriously unless they steal a white man's job? Is that not a reprehensible statement to you? What additional context do you think there is that makes it something other than a horrific example of racism and sexism? Do you think black people wander around in droves and murder white people? Is that something you think actual happens? Do you believe abortion is worse than the holocaust? Again, what is the context that makes that anything but a horrific statement? Do you actually there is some scheme to replace white people with migrants? Do you actually think we should desire to have a whiter country? That being whiter is, in and of itself, a good? Because Charlie very clearly did and he states it in his own words. Do you think women should submit to men? Do you think that was an appropriate thing for him to tell Taylor Swift to do? I'd love for you to come on and explain how each of these examples from Charlie's mouth in this short video is misleading, missing context, or valid non-terrible person arguments. Which ones can you justify?
  5. He missed them completely, including on the very first play of the game. OSU didn't have to do anything.
  6. So, other than the horribly racist, xenophobic, sexist, dehumanizing, and hateful things he said, you have nothing to show he was a terrible person? The 5th amendment says you can't use what he said against him, so check and mate!
  7. Apparently not.
  8. Atlanta using the Texas oline
  9. That is an insane 3 yard run.
  10. I'd be happy with him being Case McCoy myself. Long way to go. I think he turns it around.
  11. That run was ridiculous.
  12. Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?
  13. we'll see...
  14. That seems to be what we are doing.
  15. How on fucking earth is it hyperbole?!? He literally had a worse completion percentage, lower rating, and less yards than GG had in any game except 1. Those are hard, objective numbers. The hard, objective numbers are that Arch YESTERDAY was worse than typical GG. Significantly worse.
  16. Yes, 1, that was a typo. I really don't know why you're suffering here. I'm not saying Arch can't be better. I'm saying that right now, in this moment, he is atrocious. Yes, worse than GG except for maybe one GG game, atrocious. Why you think that is a victory of some sort for you I cannot fathom.
  17. I did. But, I mean, fuck, GG's career completion percentage at Texas was 59%, which is fucking 15 points better than Arch was against goddamn UTEP. This was historically bad play at the QB position. Congrats, as far as completion percentage goes, he was better than GG against Nebraska and that's about it. Every other game GG threw for more yards and a higher completion percentage than Arch did against fucking UTEP. And, while Arch was only credited with 1 interception yesterday, at least 2 more throws should have been intercepted. And even the TD to Wingo is probably a pick 6 against good corners.
  18. I'm not talking about last fucking week. I'm talking about fucking yesterday!
  19. You're fucking blinding yourself to how fucking bad Arch was. We've had multiple wide receivers that would be more accurate than Arch was yesterday. Take away everything else, he just couldn't get the ball from point A to point B. This was beyond simple bad QBing. It was a complete inability to play the position.
  20. You're fucking blind. GG threw 5 picks against a much higher level of competition. He made bad decisions. But GG could throw the ball to a wide open receiver 5 yards away. As of yesterday, Arch cannot. Those 5 pick games are coming if he keeps playing like that. I have never seen a Texas QB be this bad at, you know, just throwing the fucking football.
  21. The GG and Swoops comments are about what he looks like right now, this season. Not what he looked like last season. I absolutely agree he has looked better last year. Right now, he is worse than Swoops and, at best, matching GG. Yesterday was, without exaggeration, the absolute worst QB play I've seen for a Texas QB, including Hudson Card against Arkansas. He couldn't do anything against a bad a team. He couldn't complete basic plays with any consistency.
  22. An average d1 QB throws for 200+ yards yesterday with that game plan. Average d1 QB play would have beat Ohio State.
  23. Arch can't execute that offense. You have to hit the easy throws at a high clip. He can't do that.
  24. Retool it to what? Haynes King can throw a 7 yard hitch or a simple bubble screen. Arch can't, at least not consistently. There is no retooling around Arch right now. Every play where he throws the ball needs to be scrapped.
  25. Our oline wasn't good against UTEP. But also, I don't know how the running game is going to do anything when teams know that Arch can't hit the broadside of a battleship.
×
×
  • Create New...