Jump to content

Texas Recruiting Notes 2023: Strippers, Monkeys, and 5-Stars


Machinator

Recommended Posts

Gerry - Best Class Scenario WITH Arch:

 

The Texas Longhorns have landed the No. 1-ranked prospect in the On3 Consensus Arch Manning, and now have a clear path to a top 5 class.

With Manning in the fold, along with seven other commitments, Inside Texas Texas takes a look at the Longhorns best class scenario. A class that would provide Steve Sarkisian and staff back-to-back top 5 classes.

This best class scenario is made up of 29 players, including 22 members of the On3 Consensus top 300. All 29 will not be in the class, but a combination of the numbers gets Texas a second straight top 5 class.

Texas Longhorns best class scenario

QB Arch Manning, New Orleans (La.) Isidore Newman

On3 Consensus: No. 1 (5-star)

#AllGasNoBrakes

RB Cedric Baxter Jr., Orlando (Fla.) Edgewater

On3 Consensus: No. 43

The competition: Florida, Miami, Texas A&M and Alabama

RB Tre Wisner, DeSoto (Texas) High

On3 Consensus: No. 295

#AllGasNoBrakes

WR Johntay Cook II, DeSoto (Texas) High

On3 Consensus: No. 32 

The competition: Texas A&M, Oregon, Michigan

WR Jaquaize Pettaway, Houston (Texas) Langham Creek

On3 Consensus: No. 62

The competition: Oklahoma

WR Ryan Niblett, Houston (Texas) Eisenhower

On3 Consensus: No. 70

#AllGasNoBrakes

WR Jaden Greathouse, Austin (Texas) Westlake

On3 Consensus: No. 127

The competition: Notre Dame

WR Mikal Harrison-Pilot, Temple (Texas) High

On3 Consensus: No. 151

The competition: California, Oklahoma, Houston

TE Will Randle, New Orleans (La.) Isidore Newman

On3 Consensus: No. 512 

#AllGasNoBrakes

TE Spencer Shannon, Santa Ana (Calif.) Mater Dei

On3 Consensus: No. 654

#AllGasNoBrakes

OT Zalance Heard, Monroe (La.) Neville

On3 Consensus: No. 59

The competition: LSU and Nebraska

OT Jaydon Chatman, Killeen (Texas) Harker Heights

On3 Consensus: No. 292

The competition: Oklahoma, LSU, Texas A&M

OT Trevor Goosby, Melissa (Texas) High

On3 Consensus: No. 459

The competition: TCU verbal 

IOL Connor Stroh, Frisco (Texas) Wakeland

On3 Consensus: No. 477

The competition: Texas A&M

IOL Andre Cojoe, Mansfield (Texas) Timberview

On3 Consensus: No. 704

The competition: TCU

DL Markis Deal, Garland (Texas) Naaman Forest

On3 Consensus: No. 88 

The competition: Georgia, TCU, Arkansas and USC

DL Hunter Osborne, Trussville (Ala.) Hewitt-Trussville

On3 Consensus: No. 108 

The competition: Clemson, Tennessee, Alabama

DL Dylan Spencer, Houston (Texas) C.E. King

On3 Consensus: No. 250

#AllGasNoBrakes

DL Terrance Green, Cypress (texas) Cy Woods

On3 Consensus: No. 271

The competition: Oregon and Michigan State

EDGE Braylan Shelby, Friendswood (Texas) High

On3 Consensus: No. 186

The competition: USC, and maybe Texas A&M

EDGE Billy Walton, Dallas (Texas) South Oak Cliff

On3 Consensus: No. 681

The competition: Oklahoma State verbal

LB/EDGE Derion Gullette, Marlin (Texas) High

On3 Consensus: No. 121

The competition: Texas A&M, Alabama and Ohio State

LB Anthony Hill, Denton (Texas) Ryan

On3 Consensus: No. 14

The competition: Texas A&M, Oklahoma, Alabama and maybe USC

LB S’Maje Burrell, Fort Worth (Texas) North Crowley

On3 Consensus: No. 230

#AllGasNoBrakes

LB Liona Lefau, Kahuku (Hi.) High

On3 Consensus: No. 339 

The competition: Oregon and maybe Utah

S Jamel Johnson, Arlington (Texas) Seguin

On3 Consensus: No. 191

#AllGasNoBrakes

N/CB/S Javien Toviano, Arlington (Texas) Martin

On3 Consensus: No. 28

The competition: Texas A&M, Georgia, LSU

CB/N Jordan Matthews, Baton Rouge (La.) Woodlawn

On3 Consensus: No. 131

The competition: Alabama 

CB Malik Muhammad, Dallas (Texas) South Oak Cliff

On3 Consensus: No. 50 

The competition: Texas A&M, and maybe Alabama 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Drool 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mitch Cumsteen said:

This feels a little bit like the Chris Simms commitment with regard to the trajectory of the program. At least I hope so. That was a game changer. 

Latest blitz podcast talked about this comparison.   This is probably bigger just because of social media and how national recruits all talk to each other now - and the media coverage of recruiting today. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...