Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If DeBoer doesn’t (a) prepare QBs 2 and 3 and I mean starting NOW and (b) sit Simpson at the first sign of the yips, there’s no point in playing at Vegetables’ stand. Jesus. What clown made us a 1.5 point favorite?

  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Ohio State was #6 in the final CFP rankings just last year.

Behind 3 Boise and 4 ASU.  The point stands

Posted
15 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

I didn’t expect Miami in over ND but Duke winning probably changed that. Gotta get that ACC team in somehow!

Had Miami and the ACC been left out, I honestly think we would have seen a blizzard of lawsuits and Clemson and F$U leaving the conference.

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, The_Great_Hornsby said:

You just lit that money on fire lol. No way Mateer survives the playoffs throwing 2 ints a game. 

I put $500 before the year on em and it pays $37500.  I'll put 3k on bama and next game ML whoever OU plays if they happen to win so I'll guarantee myself at least a few grand.  I know...nobody cares.   But this is shaggy, throw another shitpost on the pile. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Drool 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
Just now, LTtxfan said:

Why is Tech ranked in front of Oregon??

Why did all the talking heads say Tech was still in with a loss yesterday.  I honestly don't get it.  Their front 7 seems pretty good but their offense is nothing special.

Posted
16 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

Ohio State was #6 in the final CFP rankings just last year.

I'd say the important factor is getting the top 8 correct. Get out much lower than that and you get endless bickering about who had superior losses. If you're microscoping three losses, you don't belong among the elite. Sorry. Shoulda won more games than 9.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Beau Vine said:

Had Miami and the ACC been left out, I honestly think we would have seen a blizzard of lawsuits and Clemson and F$U leaving the conference.

Oh, darn.

Posted

Burn it all down. 

 

Makes no sense for Bama to be in after that showing over any number of teams.

3 teams with no head coaches going wtf 

Move it to 24 to basically mimic the historic top 24 , remove the humans from this completely 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, ChiTownDoc said:

I put $500 before the year on em and it pays $37500.  I'll put 3k on bama and next game ML whoever OU plays if they happen to win so I'll guarantee myself at least a few grand.  I know...nobody cares.   But this is shaggy, throw another shitpost on the pile. 

I don’t quite have your purchasing power. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Constant said:

I don’t quite have your purchasing power. 

All in fun, there will be disappointment eventually but getting in and a home game is a big surprise considering where we were leaving Dallas. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted

Isn't the ACC guaranteed 1 team in the playoffs? I figured that's why they took Miami, because Duke was the alternative.

Bama vs ND, well we have seen how that matchup goes in the past...

Posted
5 minutes ago, MNLonghornFUKM said:

oregon got the best draw after IU.

 

bottom bracket is a buzzsaw

an unbalanced bracket shows even more how stupid this is.  They don't even take SOS into account for that.

I think Oregon got the best draw all things considered. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Dutchrudder said:

Isn't the ACC guaranteed 1 team in the playoffs? I figured that's why they took Miami, because Duke was the alternative.

Bama vs ND, well we have seen how that matchup goes in the past...

No. If they didn't take Miami, ACC would have been out absent fucking with the rankings to put Duke over James Madison. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Dutchrudder said:

Isn't the ACC guaranteed 1 team in the playoffs? I figured that's why they took Miami, because Duke was the alternative.

Bama vs ND, well we have seen how that matchup goes in the past...

nope.  If Miami had lost to ND the ACC would have had no representative.

Posted
8 minutes ago, dcar00 said:

It is as simple as this.  Bama and Miami were out last year. they are in this year.

You think Notre Dame has a better case to be in than Miami and Bama?

 

Posted
14 minutes ago, CurlyDumps said:

You think Notre Dame has a better case to be in than Miami and Bama?

 

I think they all suck and we are better than all 3 of them.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, CurlyDumps said:

You think Notre Dame has a better case to be in than Miami and Bama?

 

This shit really happened once upon a time in 1977: 

11-1 Notre Dame's 38-10 demolition of previous #1 Texas in the Cotton Bowl vaulted them from #5 to #1 in the final AP poll, passing up 11-1 Alabama despite the Tide whipping Ohio State 35-6 in the Sugar Bowl. We’ll likely lose but . . . we will have the opportunity to advance.  

 

Posted

I knew we weren't getting in, so I'm actually pleasantly surprised by the rankings. Bama doesn't deserve to be there, but ND deserves it even less. Stop playing a soft ass schedule and join a fucking conference.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted

Texas AM beat absolutely no one worth a shit this year. Their schedule is a complete and utter joke. Their best win (Notre Dame) was kicked out of the playoff. And the only other top 15 team they played they lost to. 
 

College Fraud Playoffs
 

 

 

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
Just now, taybo20 said:

Texas AM beat absolutely no one worth a shit this year. Their schedule is a complete and utter joke. Their best win (Notre Dame) was kicked out of the playoff. And the only other top 15 team they played they lost to. 
 

College Fraud Playoffs
 

 

 

I think they beat Miami because Miami is equally fraudulent in a way worse conference. Luckily they ain’t getting through OSU and GA

Posted
1 hour ago, WBT said:

Behind 3 Boise and 4 ASU.  The point stands

No - the point doesn't stand. The teams that played for the national title last season would have missed the 4 team playoff. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Pancho said:

 

Why risk a loss in the polls that can hurt early and late, but why also risk injury to one of your better players?   

1 hour ago, BigHornedLurker said:

Burn it all down. 

 

Makes no sense for Bama to be in after that showing over any number of teams.

3 teams with no head coaches going wtf 

Move it to 24 to basically mimic the historic top 24 , remove the humans from this completely 

 

They still want the conference championship games, so they didn't allow the loss from playing in them to affect the team that got the shit kicked out of them, along with having no run game. Same with BYU, which ended ranked higher than Texas.   

Posted
3 minutes ago, ztejas said:

No - the point doesn't stand. The teams that played for the national title last season would have missed the 4 team playoff. 

In fact, 1-4 didn't win a single game.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...