Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
The House needed an additional signature on a discharge petition to move forward with an obligation to release. The new Arizona rep provides that, and could have long ago but Mike Johnson sent the House home and refused to swear her in until the Senate voted on a budget resolution. 

Yeah, I get all of that, but for the 6 Democrat senators who voted to end the shutdown, was there a hidden agenda pertaining to the Epstein files, or was that merely coincidence?
Posted
5 minutes ago, wild_turkey said:


Yeah, I get all of that, but for the 6 Democrat senators who voted to end the shutdown, was there a hidden agenda pertaining to the Epstein files, or was that merely coincidence?

Seems a little too timely to be coincidental. Caving for nothing when they knew it be wildly unpopular, and pawning it off on exactly the right number of congressmen not up for reelection leads me to believe that they knew something was coming this week.

But giving Democrats credit for any kind of next level planning is really difficult.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

The timing isn’t terrible in retrospect. The shutdown is over which allows the media to move on from that, to immediately be replaced by new Epstein information. Mike Johnson had to swear in Rep Grijalva and away we go.

Whether it was planned that way or not, we’ll probably never know.



×
×
  • Create New...