Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, atomheartbevo said:


What if I told you that there are FBI agents/DOJ officials who dislike Trump and this bullshit and deliberately made sure, at least as much as they could, that we could find Trump in the files, and get at that redacted text as much as possible, while pretending to redact that information to please their bosses?

Or we can believe that dozens or hundreds of agents who work with PDF files every fucking day just absolutely whiffed something this simple in a case this high-profile?

Probably some truth to this.  The one thing normal FBI agents are better at than your average cops, it's preparing evidence/a case for trial.

Even the feebs, if not the DOJ lawyers, should know how to produce flattened or image pdfs with proper redactions.  They may well have sandbagged.

  • Hook 'Em 4
Posted
On 12/22/2025 at 10:12 PM, Firemans4Horn said:


The krassensteins are full of shit grifters. This is false. 

I've seen this in multiple places now.  What's the verdict?

Posted

I won't rule out that the whole "raped a 13 year old and witnessed the murder of an infant on Lake Michigan" thing is true, but until there's some corroboration, it's more likely to have been a crazy person saying crazy shit and the "tip" ended up in the file. They have a strong incentive to poison the well with decoy smoking guns so that the public loses confidence and interest in the Epstein Files. Boy Who Cried Wolf principle.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
15 hours ago, Hank Kingsley said:

Fascinating that we have a pdf from the DOJ's website of this Epstein letter to Nassar, which was confirmed to have existed by Rolling Stone in a 2023 article (but letter hadn't been opened yet per reporting), and the contents of which are absolutely explosive and pointed directly at Trump...yet everyone is treading lightly about it. In a previous world, this alleged piece of evidence would be a global story and all anyone talks about.

Trump getting away with everything and the constant misinformation we are fed has completed altered our reality. 

 

Outside of the United States it is what people talk about. I meet people from all over the world and anytime TFG’s name comes up they just assume he’s a pedophile and ask why he is not in prison for what he did.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
  • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:

ah yes, that centuries-old bastion of rock solid factual information - justthenews.com

I prefer trustuseverythingweprintis100%truewesweatergawd.com

  • Like 2
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, TexArcher said:

Helpful hint: you are going to have to turn on this guy.  The longer you wait, the worse it is for you.  Admit you were wrong, cut him loose, and call for him to be hanged from a tree.  Come back to sanity.

the problem is most of them are perfectly okay with him raping children.

  • Like 1
  • Rage+1 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, TexArcher said:

Helpful hint: you are going to have to turn on this guy.  The longer you wait, the worse it is for you.  Admit you were wrong, cut him loose, and call for him to be hanged from a tree.  Come back to sanity.

You know this, but temper your expectations. A very select few truly remorseful, regretful people with some integrity left will admit to being wrong and duped and partially responsible for the likely irreparable damage done to this country. The rest will wait 20 years--when the name Trump is a pariah--and pretend that, of course, they never voted for him.

  • Like 1
Posted

If hard proof of years of child rape doesn't snap them back to reality then nothing will.

It will just be important to constantly remind these pieces of garbage going forward that they support Satan. An entire party who worships money and power, hates the poor (and basically anyone different from them), and condones child sex trafficking.

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Red Five said:

If hard proof of years of child rape doesn't snap them back to reality then nothing will.

It will just be important to constantly remind these pieces of garbage going forward that they support Satan. An entire party who worships money and power, hates the poor (and basically anyone different from them), and condones child sex trafficking.

Lest we forget, this is the same party that couldn't be bothered with any form of gun reform after Sandy Hook, Columbine, Parkland, Uvalde and more. They've already told us they cannot "snap back to reality", it's time we all start to believe them. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Red Five said:

If hard proof of years of child rape doesn't snap them back to reality then nothing will.

It will just be important to constantly remind these pieces of garbage going forward that they support Satan. An entire party who worships money and power, hates the poor (and basically anyone different from them), and condones child sex trafficking.

People still go to the Catholic church and join the boy scouts. Have to understand no one gives a shit about the kids. I see a rebrand and move away from MAGA similar to how “Tea Party” went away after a surge of noise. 
The people crawling back into their shells and hiding post the Trump days will all come back down the line. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Bullneck said:

We don't care.  Prosecute him.

I saw Matt Groening's name mentioned.  I like The Simpsons as much as anyone but if he's got to fry, fry him.

 

Bill Gates as well.  Any of the people who flew with Epstein, fuck em, lock em up.

  • Hook 'Em 8
  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/22/2025 at 1:24 PM, Hook1997 said:

The only people on earth not calling this a coverup at this point still have Trump flags flying in their yard…. 

Speaking of which, we just drove from Austin to Granby, Colorado, via Amarillo, We saw one Trump flag on the entire trip. One.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 4
Posted

Almost there Mikey, almost there, just a few more dots to connect.

This sh!t has to cease by mass arrests of the upper crust sickos that did this stuff. 

Ok, I’ll buy that Epstein is dead (for now). But if a former president or presidents of any country or other “elites” are part of child rape and sexual abuse, I’m not someone you want as your enemy. 

There WILL NOT be two sets of rules in America. 

I don’t GAS who these people are. It isn’t about Epstein and democrats, it is about child sexual abuse by morally depraved psychopaths who think they rule the world. They don’t, we do!

@realDonaldTrump deal with this issue front and center

@AGPamBondi this is a disaster.

@SusieWiles get a grip on this issue, it is not going away.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, atomheartbevo said:

@realDonaldTrump deal with this issue front and center

Jesus Fucking Christ. This dumb motherfucker a month from now: "So by now we've all seen the pictures and videos of Trump having sex with 14 year-olds. Dozens and dozens of them, spanning a decade. So he was obviously doing that in an attempt to expose the real pedophiles... but why??" 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Like 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, SaucyJack said:

Orange-4-Life

 

200w.gif

 

Pretty sure that poster is PRONG HORN, which would explain his psychotic idiocy. It’s either him or Pimphand, who’s equally deranged.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

So, two more weeks gang?
 

Also if I didn't know any better would think the Orange Man was tweeting out from the Justice Department X handle calling reporters "dopes"...oh wait thats probably exactly what is happening...
 

 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

When Clinton was thought to have been involved in an illegal land development scheme in the 90s, he was investigated by a special counsel.

i know the answer but how in the world can we have smoking guns with Trump being involved in pedophilia, and it’s brushed off as political bs. I still think the most likely story is that Trump was involved in some sleazy situations but that doesn’t mean children were involved.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

When Clinton was thought to have been involved in an illegal land development scheme in the 90s, he was investigated by a special counsel.

i know the answer but how in the world can we have smoking guns with Trump being involved in pedophilia, and it’s brushed off as political bs. I still think the most likely story is that Trump was involved in some sleazy situations but that doesn’t mean children were involved.

He was 100% involved with underage women. There is zero doubt

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
51 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

When Clinton was thought to have been involved in an illegal land development scheme in the 90s, he was investigated by a special counsel.

i know the answer but how in the world can we have smoking guns with Trump being involved in pedophilia, and it’s brushed off as political bs. I still think the most likely story is that Trump was involved in some sleazy situations but that doesn’t mean children were involved.

Define "children". If "unable to bear children" is your definition, then maybe you're right. But now you sound like someone finding a way to justify a fucking monster forcing an underage girl to have sex with him.

Posted
15 hours ago, UpperWestside said:

Outside of the United States it is what people talk about. I meet people from all over the world and anytime TFG’s name comes up they just assume he’s a pedophile and ask why he is not in prison for what he did.

Why isn’t he in prison for attempting a coup like Bolsonaro?

  • Rage+1 2
Posted

Pro-Trump Influencers Stay Conspicuously Quiet About Epstein Files
Their silence contrasted with the uproar made over the weekend when the Justice Department’s first release focused on former President Bill Clinton.

Pro-Trump influencers have always had a lot to say about the Jeffrey Epstein files.

Several called for their release before President Trump was re-elected, certain that the files would expose a cabal of Democrats who had palled around with Mr. Epstein even though he had been exposed as a convicted sex offender.

And several criticized Mr. Trump himself this year after he repeatedly sought to block the files’ release, referring to them as a “Democratic hoax.”

But many of them were conspicuously quiet on Tuesday, when the Justice Department released a batch of materials that contained hundreds of mentions of Mr. Trump. Their silence contrasted with the uproar made over the weekend when the department’s first release focused on former President Bill Clinton, including an image, stripped of context, showing him reclining in a hot tub. (Mr. Clinton has never been accused of wrongdoing in connection with Mr. Epstein.)

“It’s pretty rich how the Democrats falsely accused President Trump of being a pedophile, only for the Trump DOJ to release Epstein files that show Bill Clinton skinny dipping with a pedophile in the pedo’s pool,” Laura Loomer, the arch Trump ally and conservative commentator, wrote on social media on Saturday. “Maybe now the media will stop obsessing over these files.”

On Tuesday, however, Ms. Loomer said nothing about the newly released materials, which showed, among other things, that federal prosecutors had determined that Mr. Trump had flown on Mr. Epstein’s private plane more times than they originally knew.

Instead, Ms. Loomer seemed to post about everything except the Epstein files: immigrant work visas; “anti-white racism”; next year’s midterm elections; and Zohran Mamdani, the mayor-elect of New York.

A similar pattern appeared in the X account of Rogan O’Handley, a lawyer and conservative influencer who posts under the handle DC Draino.

On Friday, Mr. O’Handley assailed Mr. Clinton, writing that the Epstein files had depicted him “shirtless in a hot tub with a female that is not his wife.”

But on Tuesday, Mr. O’Handley had nothing at all to say about the files.

Benny Johnson, a popular pro-Trump podcaster and host of “The Benny Show,” also avoided mentioning the Epstein files on Tuesday. He focused on other issues, including a transgender instructor who was fired from the University of Oklahoma and a bus driver from Pennsylvania who lost her job after asking students she was driving to speak English.

One Trump-friendly account did, however, post about the newly released files: the one run by the Justice Department. The department released a statement on Tuesday, seeking to give context to the material, some of which contained unverified or unsubstantiated accusations against Mr. Trump.

“Some of these documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims made against President Trump that were submitted to the F.B.I. right before the 2020 election,” the department’s statement said.

The claims, it added, were “unfounded and false, and if they had a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.”



×
×
  • Create New...