Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

I mean....that may be the least hideous part of that book.  The girls are like elementary school age in pic one, so 20 years later would make them 25 or better.  Those are actually women, well into legal age.  How refreshing!  I'd have expected the dates to be 183 to 1993, so he's getting some of those sweet 14-16 year olds.

And yeah, Jesus....every one of these people knew EXACTLY what Epstein was - a fucking predator - and they didn't shy away from it, they celebrated it.  Imagine if one of your friends was into fucking underage girls.  First...imagine that you remained friends with him after finding that out.  Then, imagine that you wrote him funny notes celebrating the fact.  WTF is wrong with these people?

Let's assume that all the girls became bleached blondes, and the illustrator's intent was to say that the girls from 1983 and the same ones in the 2003 picture. I think that's the most likely conclusion to draw. You are right that in 2003 they are all past the age of consent, but the only way those girls stayed in his life would've been if he was systematically grooming them for those 20 years, which is pretty fucking gross.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
 

This is the hilarious part about all of the bootlickers lining up to embarrass themselves. “It’s a hoax, it’s clearly faked” etc. Yeah that’s from a 22 year-old book.

A lot of this, unfortunately, would have gone away if Trump had just said “I think I just had someone do a doodle real quick and I signed it without paying attention. I don’t know what it means now and I didn’t back then either.” But, neither he nor his cult members operate that way, even when it’s really, really in his best interests to do so.
  • Hook 'Em 1


×
×
  • Create New...