Jump to content

Txzen

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    782
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Txzen

  1. 2 minutes ago, chemHORN said:

    Just want to check with ztejas since all your resteraunts are closed now, are we now allowed to talk about how much Arch sucked the last 3 games or you watching some late night PAC12 action?

    Cal vs Minn is spicy, yo. 

  2. 7 minutes ago, Slacks said:

    Yes, he was. GG made bad decisions (under duress). Manning is making bad decisions and VERY bad throws. He's missing the easy read and he's throwing at the feet of open receivers. He looks like he has a rotator cuff / impingement issue... 

    This is currently very bad QB play. He should be in a position battle. 

    Convince yourself this is better execution than Swoopes, then tell me you're convinced and how you got there. 

    I still think something is broken. Arch has a very inconsistent throwing motion. Maybe he always has and I just haven't see enough of him. I don't know if he's watching Mahommes and trying to emulate that, but every pass looks different and so many passes are thrown late and low. 

    When he sets his feet and throws the way he's been trained, you can tell. The rest are random as hell and off target. 

    Something is... Off. 

    I wish I knew him so I could talk to him. 

    This. I expected the late cross-body throws over the middle for INTs. But from a clean pocket, the high, behind, and off the turf throws - no. 
     

    To coin a phrase - he is very self-defecating. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  3. There’s just a lack of some basic fundamentals out there on O. OL had a difficult time with basic coverage.
     

    The Wingo sweep was a comedy of errors as 83/Shannon moved out to block and let two people pass him by while he hand-checked air.
     

    Route running looks slow and sloppy. 
     

    And our QB is still missing easy throws in the same manner as game #1. 
     

    Play-calling is probably not helping him out much either. 
     

    Not good, Bob. 

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Like 1
  4. 11 minutes ago, babysdaddy said:

    And you've had other posters say things like "I hope he dies" and "be careful about posting things that are too gleeful about his death".  Morons don't represent either side

     

    Regardless, I'm guessing we will know exactly what his motivation was given he's still alive and being interviewed.  Big tell will be if lots of that info is released or not.  If it isn't, assume groyper or whatever the fuck that word is (I'm old).  If it is released, it will be because his motivation can be pinned on antifa/left leanings.  The blame/assignment of motive is now the political football.  And it's disgusting.

    More like - expect both narratives to be propagated online regardless of what information is released. But I do wish it were that simple. Hard to tell the signal from the noise these days. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
  5. 1 hour ago, ztejas said:

    And it's full of left wingers thinking it was some professional that Trump hired to have Charlie killed to distract from Epstein. That was like the first thing my mom texted me two days ago - who is chronically online in left-leaning spaces.

    So what is your point exactly? There are a bunch of dipshits online from both sides? 

    Oddly enough both sides are being fed by the same troll factory in St. Petersburg. 

    • Hook 'Em 4
    • Rage+1 2
×
×
  • Create New...