Spring Branch Horn
-
Posts
63 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Spring Branch Horn
-
-
3 minutes ago, Bozo_Casanova said:
Old head from Hornfans. Was often unfairly confused with @Clearlakehorn back when he was a normal conservative and @Tennesseehorn, who used to use emoji extensively. I'm glad he's here.
My name on Hornfans was utstudboy
-
Just now, Goredho said:
Let me start by saying I could be wrong and I hope like hell I am, but...
As the overmatched opponent, It is better to lie in wait ready to seize an opportunity when it is presented than it is to overestimate an opportunity, act and fail. If the Dems fail, they will have shown themselves to be completely powerless to stop the conservative movement. They will be the political equivalent of Garrett Gilbert after 54774579 interceptions at K-State. No one, least of all their supporters, will have faith in their ability to serve as any sort of effective opposition to Trump, McConnell, etc...
That is a much worse position to be in. All you have are empty threats that everyone knows is utterly meaningless bullshit. Before the showdown demonstrating exactly how powerless you are, you have opportunity. After, you have none. You have lost the illusion of power that coupled with moral or intellectual correctness gives you the ability to serve as a counter against the more powerful majority. It will have to get a lot worse over a lot longer time for the tide to turn.
Is that risk worth the completely futile attempt to remove the President less than 12 months before the voters could send him packing?
We’ll fucking see.
I agree - I think that he had no chance before impeachment
- 2
- 1
-
9 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:
I'd just like to reiterate my question from earlier: if you know the opposing party is on the impeachment hunt from day one, why in the world would you commit multiple impeachable offenses?
Trump is not the smartest dude -/he likes a fight
-
2 minutes ago, DDD Dad said:
So who's sock is SBH? Is it Clearlake Horn reborn?
I used to be on all the longhorn forums over the years ( even Longhorn Bob's ) - I am old. Katy was a tough admin
- 1
-
I am actually enjoying the back and forth
- 1
- 1
-
5 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:
the question you should ask yourself is - if the dems wanted to impeach since day 1, then why did they wait 3 years?
the answer...may shock you.
they did not have the numbers in the House
- 1
- 11
-
1 minute ago, David Dennison said:
I believe the term Russians use is "useful idiot." See: Donald Trump.
Not useful
- 1
-
8 minutes ago, David Dennison said:
Yes, no, and Fusion GPS is an American company.
The source documents were Russian - ever read the Dossier? English was not their first language
- 3
-
Just now, TXSG8R said:
They believed he violated the emoluments clause IIRC.
They also beleived Carter Page was a Russian Spy
- 2
-
Just now, Fozzz said:
Now this is epic.
Did she know the words?
- 1
- 10
-
Just now, David Dennison said:
That's the entire party.
The Democrats?
- 4
-
Just now, David Dennison said:
The same reason the Republicans wanted to impeach Obama from day 1. Welcome to politics.
No serious people only the crazies
- 3
-
2 minutes ago, DixonHur said:
I believe that was a civil case...hence, not indicted. Next?
PS - If you want to see indictments of a former President, you're in for a treat once Trump is out of office.
Certainly not for Russian Collusion
- 1
- 3
-
36 minutes ago, CowboyFred said:
yes, but in this impeachment, it is not a blow job we're talking about. the current president committed actual crimes and is going to be impeached over it.
then why did the Democrats want to impeach him from Day 1?
- 1
- 6
-
Just now, jimmyjazz said:
Uh, what? Mueller brought and spun off numerous crimes. He specifically stated that it was DOJ policy to not indict a sitting President, and that this is what guided their lack of action.
I mean, if you're just gonna troll, fine, but on the off chance you actually have an interest in the truth, catch up.
Trying to catch up - still reading the IG Report - man the FBI was sloppy
- 1
- 3
-
1 minute ago, David Dennison said:
It's illegal to solicit the assistance of a foreign nation in an election.
Is there an election? Has anyone been nominated yet? So paying for the Russian Dossier would be kosher?
- 1
- 18
-
1 minute ago, DDD Dad said:
The speaker should have the ability to turn off the mic when a speaker runs over without permission.
Yes
-
2 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:
Well, isn't this a nice Christmas present. Read the Mueller Report and Mueller's reasoning for not bringing charges. (Hint: DOJ policy)
DOJ threw them out for another reason (no underlying crime)
- 5
-
A federal judge yesterday fined Bill Clinton over $90,000 (£57,000) for denying under oath that he had had sex with Monica Lewinsky, in an unprecedented penalty imposed on an incumbent US president.
The fine was ordered by Judge Susan Webber Wright, three months after she found him guilty of contempt for giving false testimony in a sexual harassment case brought against him by a former Arkansas government employee, Paula Jones.
-
2 minutes ago, David Dennison said:
Because impeachment isn't a criminal proceeding.
historically it usually required a crime
- 7
-
I mean the legal charges for those items not the allegations - he has not been indicted or charged
- 9
-
So if that is the case - why not include them in the impeachment?
- 1
- 4
-
5 minutes ago, David Dennison said:
So has Donald Trump.
Do tell
- 14
-
3 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:
You do know it's possible he was right then and he is right now?
Yes - But more likely he is wrong then and wrong now 🤘
- 8
impeachment inquiry hearings thread
in Cloak Room
Posted
He won't be removed