Jump to content

Jag102

banned
  • Posts

    54
  • Joined

Posts posted by Jag102

  1. 4 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:

    I will say this about the Kavanaugh debacle, America got to watch the GOP show their true colors better than ever. 

    Usually they pay lip service to truth and process but in this case they went full tyranny. Concealing documents, suppressing witnesses, rigging investigations, peddling conspiracy theories and disinformation, hiding behind a woman prosecutors, blaming the media. 

    All within a two week span. 

    Well done.

    Hugo, this is not up to your standards. You were much better after the election. I bit more humble, but still you.

    • Like 1
    • Fuck You 2
  2. 4 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

    Yes I do.

    I have money.

    I have a vote.

    I can get other people to vote.

     

    No soldier ever won a war.

    But armies have.  And an army is nothing but a shitload of individual soldiers.

     

    I love this country.  I think I'll fight for it.

    Oh, and the day I DON'T give a shit about the suffering purposefully and joyfully inflicted on "the least of these," then punch my fucking ticket, I am not worthy of living and breathing on this planet any longer.

     

    I stand corrected.

     

    6 minutes ago, Dirk X West said:

    His views regarding investigations of a sitting president.

    I believe he stated that any of these civil lawsuits would be deferred. Correct me if I am wrong.

    • Fuck You 1
  3. 1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

    Demonizing rape victims, mocking them at rallies, telling us that the REAL danger to society is false allegations against men, fighting tooth and nail for a nominee almost entirely becasue they think that he might help their criminal syndicate escape justice at the SCOTUS, imprisoning children....you know what? Fuck you.  I'm done explaining myself to you fucks.  If you haven't figured out what's wrong with this shit, then I'm not going to waste a second explaining anything to you. 

    I owe you and yours nothing.  You have drawn the battle lines.  Only a fool wouldn't see that for what it is, and bring the fight to you.  This is a zero-sum game, that much has been made PERFECTLY clear.  Every positive for you must be a negative for someone else.  I like those rules.  Let's play.

    I will just put this here: "he might help their criminal syndicate escape justice at the SCOTUS, imprisoning children..." Brisketexan, I am being honest here, don't get so worked up about politics, really don't. I used too, but now I am more like Hugo, or Horn4life, both the same dudes, it's interesting but not something you have any control over.

     

     

     

    • Fuck You 2
  4. 3 minutes ago, Dirk X West said:

    No, they could have nominated someone, like Gorsuch, who's decidedly conservative but without all Kavanaugh's baggage and avoided this circus, but they pushed Kavanaugh because he's sworn his allegiance to Trump.  

    And they knew about these allegations when?

    • Fuck You 2
  5. 1 minute ago, Brisketexan said:

    No.  The start is when we get to enjoy sweet conservatears.  When a government and its leaders take action and make policies and make statements solely for the sweet joy that someone else's suffering brings them.  That's when it starts.  This is just the prelude.

    maxresdefault.jpg

     

    The rules of the game have been declared.

    Let's play.

     

    So the Republicans voting for their nominee is changing the dynamic, or rather they celebrated excessivley? Now it's gloves off?

    • Like 1
    • Fuck You 1
  6. 6 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

    Good.

    My heart is thoroughly hardened.  I see cruelty and laughter and enjoyment out of it, I want fucking revenge.  I'm fucking old-school and simple that way.  They thoroughly enjoy shitting on the weakest among us.  I will thoroughly enjoy their suffering some day.  I ripped the New Testament out of my Bible.  It's all Old Testament for me now.

    Well you at least now admit it. It's a start.

    • Like 2
    • Fuck You 2
  7. Just now, David Dennison said:

    Will you feel betrayed if Roberts swings left like he's shown an inclination to do in the past?

    Disappointed, yes, but not supprised, Republican appointees have done that several times in the past. Don't recall a single Democratic appointment to do so.

  8. Just now, Lagunamadre said:

    A lot of guesses. Here is a good summation. But a big reason is likely that people were embarrassed to admit they were voting for Trump when talking to another person. Trump did much better on anonymous online polls than he did on phone polls.  

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/31/upshot/a-2016-review-why-key-state-polls-were-wrong-about-trump.html

    Don't know if they were embarrassed, but as good an explanation as any.

  9. 5 minutes ago, JimmyJames said:

    Sorry but but you’re wrong on this one. His opinions won’t be respected. People don’t get on the Supreme Court to “get paid.” That’s asinine. They get on it to positively influence the law and be a part of history. He’ll be a part of history all right, just not the type he hoped for. And he hasn’t withdrawn because he’s an immoral political hack just like the guy who nominated him. 

    That sounds nice and all but he will have a vote. Justice Thomas has a vote. 

    For all wishing to ignore or ban me, no need. Once this confirmation vote is done, then I am out. Back to just reading the posts no responses. Must admit this can get addicting. 

    • Fuck You 5
  10. 1 minute ago, Lagunamadre said:

    National polls were dead on. The poll you brushed off as "polls are fake news, see Trump lol" was a national poll. You are making a point about apples when we are talking about oranges. Catch up. 

    Good, now address the polling in the swing states. 

    • Like 1
    • Fuck You 2
  11. Just now, David Dennison said:

    No, they were all correct. Hillary won the popular vote, which is what all of those polls measure.

    Really, so the polls that had Hillary up in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Florida and even close in Texas were correct? Those states pushed him across. 

    • Like 1
    • Fuck You 1
  12. Just now, hayden_horn said:

    jesus, you are a fucking idiot. stop digging, dude. take a breath and have a bit of a think before you post. think about WHY that poll might be terrible for republicans.

    The poll is irrelevant to the discussion which is "Brett Kavanaugh Confirmation".  Pretty simple. You want to talk about all those polls in the last election that were not correct? I believe that is a different thread. 

    • Fuck You 2
  13. 1 minute ago, lemonlime said:

    And he needs to be able to make that legal analysis, without having pre-judged cases based on his emotional volatility and rage.

    Gonna need you to give me some "pre-judged cases based on his emotional volatility and rage".

    Thanks

    1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

    Courtesy?  He had to fucking apologize to a Senator.

    Patience?  Really?

    Freedom from bias?  He literally went "Hillary" and "Dems".

     

    You're fucking nuts.  You should consider exit strategies.

    No, I believe the man will be confirmed.

    • Fuck You 4
  14. 1 minute ago, jimmyjazz said:

    Senate Judiciary Committee Standards include:

    When the committee evaluates “integrity,” it considers the nominee’s character and general reputation in the legal community, as well as the nominee’s industry and diligence.

    “Professional competence” encompasses such qualities as intellectual capacity, judgment, writing and analytical abilities, knowledge of the law and breadth of professional experience.

    In evaluating “judicial temperament,” the committee considers the nominee’s compassion, decisiveness, open-mindedness, courtesy, patience, freedom from bias and commitment to equal justice under the law.

    And you have evidence that he fails to meet any of these criteria? He defended himself from false accusations.  

    • Fuck You 2
×
×
  • Create New...