cfpisrigged
-
Posts
15 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by cfpisrigged
-
-
Only thing that matters is that Sam is better than Hurts. Orlando needs to throw some difficult schemes at him and we should make hurts look like from in the Sugar Bowl. Not a bad pickup by OU but hurts has limitations that baker and kyler didn't have
-
Corner and o-line will be biggest question marks next year. If we want to get through the season we will need to pick up a grad transfer or two on the line just for sufficient depth in case of an injury or general wear and tear. If Jones comes back our safety depth should be good enough to help offset some of the growing pains of having inexperienced corners.
-
Sam has been injured which has not allowed him to run as much the past few weeks. If his shoulder is fine and we feel comfortable running him the run game becomes much better. Biggest x-factor of the game will be Duvernay. If Sam can hit him early LJH and CJ will be open the rest of the night.
- 1
-
16 minutes ago, A’Dam Psycho said:
I don’t understand why people keep saying this. Saban was option 1. Option 2 was between Strong, Franklin, Briles, and Mora. Texas went with Strong. This whole Charlie was our fifth option baffonery is aggy manufactured nonsense
Saban was never an option that was unrealistic.
-
51 minutes ago, PilotsError said:
I believe the Wickline thing was Belmont's decision, not Charlie's.
Yea, whoever our AD was didn't want to pay the 900k that Oklahoma St wanted for him to take a lateral job so Strong was stuck with making him a playcaller.
-
7 minutes ago, TXSooner518 said:
This was because the Big 12 was so stupid, they misunderstood "the 13th data point" as meaning "they played 13 games" when really they meant "in the 13th game, they throatfucked a ranked team by 59 points." As will also be shown as ND plays 12 games and gets in over 12-1 teams this year.
The B12 also I think was hurt by the fact that everyone knew TCU was the superior team, but BU won the head to head, so that made taking either one icky, more than the "brands" involved. If TCU had beaten BU but lost some other game, I think it is much more likely that TCU would have gotten selected, as they were the best team as well as the "rightful" champion in that scenario.
I just really don't buy that brand recognition had nothing to do with Ohio St getting in. You don't believe that had it been a scenario similar to 08 with both a 1 loss Texas and Oklahoma team that Ohio St gets in over either of those teams because deciding the tie would be "icky." Ohio St got in because they were the better draw for viewers and it just helped that they killed Wisconsin in their CCG. It didn't matter how much Ohio St won buy the committee had the 13th data point excuse made up well in advance. It's the same reason Bama gets in without winning their conference.
-
It was created because of the bullshit cfp excuse that Ohio St got in over TCU and Baylor due to their 13th data point. When everyone knew it was just so they could put a bigger name team into the game. Now if it had been Texas and Oklahoma that Ohio St jumped there would be some reason for it, but I doubt that would have happened. I don't think Ohio St winning against Northwestern would be a legitimate reason to vote them over Ou if they didn't play next week. I think how the cfp ranks the two tomorrow would be the same a week later whether Ou would beat Texas or not play them.
- 1
-
1 minute ago, texaslong said:
Saw where he might be trying to bring Kingsbury and Chizik with him. That might be a pretty good staff.
Might make the ACC more than the Clemson show.
-
He was good at recruiting, but one of the worst game managers I've ever seen. Looking back on the list of candidates from that year there weren't a ton of good options. Only realistic one that would have been good was Franklin.
-
Sam's shoulder clearly not back.
-
LSU, Florida, and Kentucky way overrated. I don't think the SEC can hide them this year. Bowl season should expose them.
-
I think getting Arkansas is not that far fetched. They have not been associated with Texas for close to thirty years so pride wouldn't keep them from jumping ship like it would to aggy or nebraska. They haven't won anything in the SEC and won't for a long time. They might lose money initially, but they would get to play their biggest rival again and have a better shot at the CFP and national relevance. If the Big 12 got them anyone else would be fine.
- 1
-
CJ will be gone for sure, but LJH might stay one more. Would love to see Ehlinger and LJH tear up LSU next year.
-
Aggy goes 6-6 maybe 7-5 with 4 ooc games and only having to play Bama and LSU as quality SEC opponents. I'm not sure you could ask for a more favorable schedule and even then I don't think they have much more room for improvement. The fact LSU wins consistently is a testament to how poor the quality of play is in the SEC. How a team that hasn't completed a forward pass in a decade can compete is mind boggling
- 1
The way too early 2019 LSU at Texas game discussion
in Football
Posted
LSU's best shot at winning the game is doing what they've done for years and running the ball up the gut and trying to wear down the other line by their size and athleticism. Trying to break in a new offense on the road with an o-line and qb not suited for the new scheme seems like a recipe for disaster irrespective of how good Texas is.