Jump to content

FCB

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    101
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FCB

  1. 12 hours ago, LCHorn said:

    I actually prefer it to be around.  If it disappears you can expect a number of their posters will migrate their idiocy over here.  

    You have been over to the football board, haven't you?

  2. 8 hours ago, campcrunk said:

    There was a website called Hockey's Future that used a 10 point scale to rank prospects' potential and had a modifier (A through F) to show how likely the player was the reach that potential. For example, Colin Simmons would have probably been ranked a 10A - probable high end first rounder who is extremely likely to reach his potential - and someone like Michael Terry might be ranked something like a 8.5B or 8.5C - obvious talent and potential to be a very high level player but maybe positional uncertainty and development questions might affect his ability to get there (and please don't crucify me if you're a huge MTIII fan - it's just a hypothetical example). And someone like Javonne Shepherd would have been something like an 8F because, well, many obvious reasons.

     

    Just a thought but I think it would be cool to have something like that for CFB recruiting. Or maybe that's just a little too complicated for, ahem, "certain" members of CFB online community (read: SEC fans)

    This is football,  sir. 

    Not a sport for mid-size white guys

  3. 18 hours ago, statsman said:

    The Okies are coping with Texas reloading…

    IMG_3800.jpeg

    IMG_3799.jpeg

    They got that OUDNA. That's just as good as whatever that aggy lunacy is. 

    It won't win them any games. But it'll keep their hicks brainwashed just long enough for them to change the story when the shit hits the fan. Thatll be 9.95

    • Haha 1
  4. 35 minutes ago, tokamak said:

    So just to kind of sum up where we're at with portal needs/wants:

    • QB - All set
    • RB - They seem fairly happy here. No visitors/interest that I can remember. Maybe they look at a Velton Gardner break-glass-in-case-of-emergency type guy.
    • WR - Definitely seems like they'd take another badass with experience. Wouldn't everyone?
    • TE - Likely done with Endries?
    • OL - Flood doesn't seem like a portal guy, and we're looking at a huge high school class, so I don't see it.
    • IDL - Gotta be done with 5(!) additions from the portal so far.
    • EDGE - I could definitely see it. We brought in the Stanford guy for a visit. Would have to be someone they think can contribute.
    • LB - This one I'm not sure. Seems like Spence is getting good reviews. Depth chart is a little light in underclassmen though. If the right guy came along that had a few years to play like Watson, seems like it'd make sense.
    • DB - I wouldn't think so unless it's a guy that's just too good to pass up. The depth chart is stacked and crowded.
    • P - Done
    • K - Done

    Thoughts?

    But the numbers!!!

  5. 1 hour ago, BurntOrange&White said:

    Better than 14 play drives that don’t get touchdowns! 

    Nah, man. But we are wearing them down!  Dominating they ass!  

    Granted, you need to score to win the game. But that's where Bert Auburn comes in........shit

×
×
  • Create New...