Jump to content

Handsome Pete

New Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Handsome Pete

  1. 1 minute ago, SydneyCarton said:

    I'm not the one who claimed superior. I made zero claim. I asked you to defend a claim of "Eating our fucking lunch on the national stage." So the onus is on you to do that fucking leg work, typically. So you feel free to go back and do the fucking math on all the shit you mentioned. But it's probably going to end up closer than most people would call "Eating someone's fucking lunch" on a national stage. Of course, conference titles during the Mack Brown area and then Charlie strong can...follow me here...get fucking tied RIGHT BACK into the concept of shitty fucking coaching. So lets not forget that your initial premise was "Shitty coaching is a poor excuse for losing football games."

    Why don't you fucking defend that fucking premise, you ignorant fucking dipshit. Because there's one thing I will claim superiority here, and that's the quality of our education and the caliber of the IQ of our fucking graduates. And exhibit A in that fucking defense is "Shitty coaching is a poor excuse for losing football games." Exhibit B is the net worth of our fucking state, and Exhibit C is stop fucking your immediate family members and go fuck yourself instead.

    Last 5 decades have been OU 27-21-3. Superiority

    • Fuck You 19
  2. 5 minutes ago, SydneyCarton said:

    Let me stop you right fucking here, dipshit. At sentence one. Are you really attempting to claim that extremely poor, neigh, some of the worst possible coaching available is a poor excuse for not winning games on the football field? And then you're going to sit there and pretend that citing higher recruiting rankings actually PROVES that shitty coaching directly correlates to shitting fucking football teams? What're you, suggesting there's some magic force-field around Austin takes talented kids and makes them shitty once they move into the dorms? As opposed to just...shitty coaching? Tell me again what happened when Bob Stoops took over a talented program that had been run into the ground by shitty coaching by year 2? 

    Oh, sorry, I just got to your second paragraph and that is indeed what you're suggesting. And you threw in a notion that you've beating eating Texas's lunch on the national stage for 50 years yet somehow you don't even have 50 wins total in the entire series. Listen, we'll give you the 2000s (7-14) because Charlie is the worst program coach ever and Mack Brown was a gutless pussy. 

    The 90s Texas was 7-2-1.

    80s; Texas was 4-5-1

    70s: 6-3-1

    I'm going to go ahead and do some math for you really fast, because you're from Oklahoma. That's a record of 24-24-3. That's literally fucking TIED the last 5 decades. So, riddle me this, sister fucker, how would YOU define "Eating someone's lunch on the national stage." Go ahead, we'll wait. Please, explain your definition.

    While you're at it, feel free to paint us a picture of "oklahoma's trajectory" as you see it, using whatever data points you have. Is continuing to win the Big 12 while Texas has been weak AF and getting your shit pushed in the playoffs? Because I don't know how to tell you this, ace, but that isn't exactly an upward trajectory. A plateau, however...

    I would consider the "national stage" to be more than head to head competition although head to head is a factor. Along with head to head I would consider total wins/losses, conference championships, national championships, all-americans, AP rankings, BCS appearances, New Years Day bowl apperances, Heisman winners etc.

    By what metric has Texas been superior on the football field to Oklahoma in the past 50 years?

    I don't know how to explain the massive failure that Texas has experienced for five decades when compared to what I consider reasonable expectations. How do you? 

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Fuck You 12
  3. 6 minutes ago, Scholz said:

    And yet UT has both won a national title and played in a national title game more recently than your "school".  You do win the Big XII a lot, you just faceplant on the national stage every time.  Congrats?  Blowu is certainly a nice regional power.

     

    1 minute ago, Mr_Robot_ulism said:

    Texas isn’t even a power in, well Texas. 

    Beat me to it

    • Fuck You 22
  4. 29 minutes ago, golfclap said:

    It's almost like -- and help me with the timeline here -- Texas is coming off the single worst coach in program histor, we fired that guy and he went on to get fired from USF because he's fucking terrible at his job and we had to rebuild from the ground up.

    So again - a simple couple of questions. 

    Do you think Texas is better today than they were in 2016?  

    Do you think Oklahoma is better today than they were in 2016? 

    Now,  let's try a quick exercise take the 2016 and 2020 Texas rosters and combine them and let me know how many guys from 2016 are on the depth chart. Now do the same for OU. 

     

     

     

    What a bullshit excuse for Texas' consistent sucking in relation to expectations. Do you want to review Texas' recruiting classes year over year with Oklahoma and the rest of the Big 12? Texas currently has, and has consistently had, for the last 20 years the most talent on paper of any program in the Big 12.

    We can blame poor evaluations and coaching for forever but at the end of the day there is just something rotten in the state of Denmark. I don't know if it is Austin, the administration, the sense of entitlement that comes from being at the flagship school in Texas but something is wrong. You cannot pin this on Charlie Strong because Oklahoma has been eating Texas' lunch on the national stage for 50 years. 

    With the exception of a 10 year period between 2000-2009 the last 50 years of Texas football have barely exceeded mediocrity and for you to sit here and prognosticate the downfall of your rival because, while they have won 5 straight conference championships, they have ONLY been winning close games these last couple years is fucking horseshit. 

    The first three years of Lincoln Riley's time at Oklahoma have been 36-6. Tom Herman has been 25-15. How does one excuse that difference considering the comparable talent?

    2020 may be a whole new story but until proven otherwise I will bet upon Texas shitting the bed.

     

    Now, to answer your questions:

    Texas is better as a program than they were going into 2016. All available data confirms that. I do not know whether Texas will have a better year than they did in 2016 but the program is better.

    Oklahoma is better as a program than they were going into 2016. All available data confirms that. I do not know whether Oklahoma will have a better year than they did in 2016 but the program is better.

     

    If your only solace is that Oklahoma has been winning close games then you probably need to take off the orange colored glasses and do more than a simpleminded single varied analysis Oklahoma's trajectory.

    • Fuck You 22
×
×
  • Create New...