-
Posts
57 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by UtBlaw
-
-
Just now, UDontKnow said:
Are you suggesting that aggy are not incel?
Caught me as I was editing. Realized the same thing
-
27 minutes ago, Texasrocks said:
Two kinds of people use alpha/beta - aggys and losers.
I thought the terms were popularized by the incel community. I guess that doesn’t contradict you tho
- 2
- 1
-
1 hour ago, henrygandorf said:
why is there so much nft discussion?
do they really need to be that clever about it? seems like there’s no rule about overall licensing deals that pay big $$ and don’t even require a photo, autograph, or public appearance, let alone unique digital collectibles.
and everyone on the team is eligible, though the tales of “this will only become a thing with the big stars” bit is adorable.
This particular NFT thing is clever because it makes determining fair market value for it nearly impossible partly because of its uniqueness and partly because of the parties involved.
A booster could pay millions for it on the pretense it’s a speculative collectible on the future best NFL player in history .
What do you compare it too? Plus art is in the eye of the beholder. It’s not like a pair of shoes.
And Fuck u if u consider shoes art. u dapper sneaker head
- 1
-
6 hours ago, Wulaw Horn said:
I might be on it maybe? I need to have some mind space to think about this and how I can make it work. The biggest thing I need though is the ability to coordinate with staff. I think that’s illegal. I’m sure everyone is doing it. I bet we aren’t. I would think if there are a coupe forward thinking business men on here we could rustle up $50-100k. Put another way- if I could make this thing work for me I could happily put in mid 5 figures without blinking, but I’d need buy in from some other stakeholders
Give me a week or two and I will try to come up with something but will probably need a little bit of help with some stuff.
It depends on what you mean by “coordinate” with UT staff. It’s possible they delegated everything to a third party to act as kind of a go between. They have have a compliance email I imagine is for questions like yours. The UT staff can’t organize the deal or help set it up (like physically be there). I don’t have enough posts to access the thread with the rest of your thoughts but like I said I’ll be glad to help if needed.
-
5 hours ago, Lonestar88 said:
The NCAA had plenty of chances to do this, but they are a useless, leaderless organization.
Agreed. But here’s why—SCOTUS threatened to deem the NCAA a monopoly if they passed any national regulations. NCAA got scared and so states just started passing laws
-
19 minutes ago, Wulaw Horn said:
I might be on it maybe? I need to have some mind space to think about this and how I can make it work. The biggest thing I need though is the ability to coordinate with staff. I think that’s illegal. I’m sure everyone is doing it. I bet we aren’t. I would think if there are a coupe forward thinking business men on here we could rustle up $50-100k. Put another way- if I could make this thing work for me I could happily put in mid 5 figures without blinking, but I’d need buy in from some other stakeholders
Give me a week or two and I will try to come up with something but will probably need a little bit of help with some stuff.
If you need extra legal help I can probably donate some time.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Coelenterate Fuccboi said:
I haven’t really followed the details of the Texas administration’s approach to NIL, but on the surface it appears they went with the “here’s what you can do for yourself” (social media) approach, instead of the “here’s what we can do for you” approach.
Am I wrong or was it that lazy?
They had to do it that way because Texas NIL pretty much says as much, unfortunately
-
On 7/4/2021 at 10:10 PM, futureman said:
you a Prius guy?
Nope
-
33 minutes ago, Gut Wagon said:
Just don't try to pump your own gas, bro.
I literally don’t pump my own gas, bro. Thanks for the uhh…advice tho
-
The state of Texas fucked us with our statute. If they repeal it Texas schools can do whatever the fuck they want. I can’t even conceive of what Aggy would engage in
-
Fun fact:
Oregon’s statute also doesn’t prohibit tobacco, alcohol, guns, or sexually oriented businesses like Texas’ does.
- 1
-
37 minutes ago, futureman said:
are you knowledgeable about the NIL rules? what violations do you think you see?
In Texas athletes can’t contact with Nike or any of the other UT “partners” which appear to be half of Austin’s businesses. Another attorney told me that. I thought it would depend upon the particular contracts between UT and the businesses.
You also can’t match up or endorse businesses to athletes.
You also can’t suggest to recruits whom they can work with if they decide to enroll. This last one is the most damning. I bet Oregon tells this kid how to reword what he said ASAP
-
2 minutes ago, Coelenterate Fuccboi said:
I agree.
The second Texas should be Oregon. I get u prolly knew that but it won’t let me edit my post.
-
13 minutes ago, Foosters said:
Welcome to the club, pal.
Thank you, Sir!
-
-
18 minutes ago, futureman said:
are you knowledgeable about the NIL rules? what violations do you think you see?
Yes, I’m an attorney
-
I just glanced at Oregon’s statute. It is way more permissive than Texas is. What would be a violation in Texas isn’t in Texas. Still seems sketchy tho
-
-
-
58 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:
Pretty much no way around "leniency" = license. Which would then implicate the "policing" aspect of it.
On another note, Wanna broach post #856 TwiceHorn? SKG’s question specifically
-
Just now, UtBlaw said:
I should have used a different word. I meant it only in the sense those schools are allowing students to use IP to varying degrees. I didn’t look into the specifics.
In general, I just want UT to be under pressure to loosen up.
Oops, I thought that was a “not equal” sign in the post above for some reason and got confused. 😂
-
36 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:
Pretty much no way around "leniency" = license. Which would then implicate the "policing" aspect of it.
I should have used a different word. I meant it only in the sense those schools are allowing students to use IP to varying degrees. I didn’t look into the specifics.
In general, I just want UT to be under pressure to loosen up.
-
3 hours ago, Beau Vine said:
Lauren Burke is 22; she's not a kid.
If you wanna be a bitch about it then you mean minor. She is still someone’s kid. And I didn’t say she was a minor.
-
3 hours ago, David Dennison said:
Leniency or are they licensing the use of trademarks?
Dunno exactly how exactly they’re doing so I just called it “leniency.”
Texas Recruiting Notes 2022 - Idiotic Slapfights Unrelated To 2022 Recruiting
in 🤫$9.95🤫
Posted
supposedly will be ready by track season whatever it was