Jump to content

UtBlaw

New Members
  • Posts

    57
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by UtBlaw

  1. I thought the terms were popularized by the incel community. I guess that doesn’t contradict you tho
  2. This particular NFT thing is clever because it makes determining fair market value for it nearly impossible partly because of its uniqueness and partly because of the parties involved. A booster could pay millions for it on the pretense it’s a speculative collectible on the future best NFL player in history . What do you compare it too? Plus art is in the eye of the beholder. It’s not like a pair of shoes. And Fuck u if u consider shoes art. u dapper sneaker head
  3. It depends on what you mean by “coordinate” with UT staff. It’s possible they delegated everything to a third party to act as kind of a go between. They have have a compliance email I imagine is for questions like yours. The UT staff can’t organize the deal or help set it up (like physically be there). I don’t have enough posts to access the thread with the rest of your thoughts but like I said I’ll be glad to help if needed.
  4. Agreed. But here’s why—SCOTUS threatened to deem the NCAA a monopoly if they passed any national regulations. NCAA got scared and so states just started passing laws
  5. They had to do it that way because Texas NIL pretty much says as much, unfortunately
  6. I literally don’t pump my own gas, bro. Thanks for the uhh…advice tho
  7. The state of Texas fucked us with our statute. If they repeal it Texas schools can do whatever the fuck they want. I can’t even conceive of what Aggy would engage in
  8. Fun fact: Oregon’s statute also doesn’t prohibit tobacco, alcohol, guns, or sexually oriented businesses like Texas’ does.
  9. In Texas athletes can’t contact with Nike or any of the other UT “partners” which appear to be half of Austin’s businesses. Another attorney told me that. I thought it would depend upon the particular contracts between UT and the businesses. You also can’t match up or endorse businesses to athletes. You also can’t suggest to recruits whom they can work with if they decide to enroll. This last one is the most damning. I bet Oregon tells this kid how to reword what he said ASAP
  10. The second Texas should be Oregon. I get u prolly knew that but it won’t let me edit my post.
  11. I just glanced at Oregon’s statute. It is way more permissive than Texas is. What would be a violation in Texas isn’t in Texas. Still seems sketchy tho
  12. I just glanced at Oregon’s statute. It is way more permissive than Texas is. What would be a violation in Texas isn’t in Texas. Still seems sketchy tho
  13. What do y’all think about this quote from an Oregon recruit? Seems very suggestive of NIL violations to me. I can read one possible violation as ambiguous but not another. Any Opinions?
  14. On another note, Wanna broach post #856 TwiceHorn? SKG’s question specifically
  15. Oops, I thought that was a “not equal” sign in the post above for some reason and got confused. 😂
  16. I should have used a different word. I meant it only in the sense those schools are allowing students to use IP to varying degrees. I didn’t look into the specifics. In general, I just want UT to be under pressure to loosen up.
  17. If you wanna be a bitch about it then you mean minor. She is still someone’s kid. And I didn’t say she was a minor.
  18. Dunno exactly how exactly they’re doing so I just called it “leniency.”
×
×
  • Create New...