Jim Tom Pinch
-
Posts
189 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Jim Tom Pinch
-
-
14 minutes ago, hobbes2702 said:
It really is amazing how stupid people always favor making ignorant statements with no factual basis. Really an amazing coincidence
Apologies for interrupting the Left Wing circle jerk in here.
Carry on.
- 8
-
It really is amazing how ballots “found” after Election Day always favor Democrats who are trailing. Really an amazing coincidence.
- 2
- 4
-
3 minutes ago, futureman said:
should she?
No
-
On 10/27/2018 at 10:31 AM, NeverMarryAStripper said:
My sophomore year apartment mate woke me up one night at about 3:00 am. He was drunk as shit and wanted me to go outside and see his new truck. I went just to shut him up, and parked outside was a Reddy Ice truck that he had found with the keys left in it. He couldn’t remember where he found it so we just drove it down the street and left it with the keys in it.
I must still be in college because everything in this post makes perfect sense.
- 1
- 1
-
-
2 hours ago, SKJ said:
With this post, you are making several assumptions that we cannot know.
Did the "other side" bring up concerns about a nominee? Yes, but those concerns had to be there to be brought up. You act as if the "other side" manufactured these concerns.
The nominee lied. A bunch. All throughout his hearing. They also refused to produce a shitload of information.
As to your assertion that they would have smeared any conservative nominee, well, it's apparent that no one could know. It's a very strange argument. It implies a sort of prescience that I don't possess.
I wish the republicucks would've pulled him and nominated a person without so much baggage so we could have seen if that were correct, but they didn't. They blew that chance.
The “Other Side” stated it opposed the nominee before anyone had been nominated. To assert the “Other Side” gave a flying fuck about any nominee’s background is ridiculous.
-
On 10/4/2018 at 4:10 PM, Modessit said:
I'm thinking he married a dude. Women don't text like that even if they get pissed enough to talk like that.
Funny, I’m thinking he married my ex...
-
43 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
It’s cute you just block out all the criminals he’s surrounded himself with and you don’t think that’s going to catch up to him one way or another.
I don’t see a way for him to depart the office without resigning and immediately getting pardoned by Pence.
He might make it through 2019, but it will be a nightmare for him.
Just keep telling yourself that while you’re lighting candles in front of your Hillary Shrine every night.
- 1
-
47 minutes ago, David Dennison said:
He'll be indicted. He won't be president forever.
Well no shit he won’t be President forever. You figure that out all by yourself or did Hugo help you?
- 1
- 1
-
It’s cute you guys think any of that will happen.
-
Just now, Hugo Stiglitz said:
There’s around four different things that could happen. You figure it out.
You brought it up. Answer the question.
-
2 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
Trump will be lucky to make it through 2019
What do you mean?
-
2 hours ago, jimmyjazz said:
Really? Dr. Ford had anything to do with Kavanaugh's perjury?
I fucking dare you to step up and be an American. You're a traitor. You don't know the meaning of "American" you weasely piece of shit. Don't be surprised when . . .
What is it with Libs like you and Brisket? Have you always been mentally unstable or is Liberalism rotting your brain?
- 1
- 1
-
3 hours ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
It’s funny watching the party of sex offenders, pedophiles, nazis, and moral cowards act like they gained something in all this.
What did the Democrats gain?
- 1
- 1
-
58 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:
I’m patient.
Your merciless pain and suffering will be worth the wait. Maybe not today. Or tomorrow. But someday. And the longer we wait, the worse we’ll make it.
I’m good with that. Revenge. Served cold. It’s best.You should really seek professional help.
- 1
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Newy25 said:
So was this about his beer consumption in college or the alleged sexual assault in high school? I was under the impression the issue was the Ford allegation in high school.
The scope of the investigation was to determine if he assualted Ford. They could not find any evidence he did.
You can’t reason with the mentally ill.
-
1 hour ago, Newy25 said:
I honest to God do not even know what you are talking about.
You demanded an FBI investigation into the sexual assault allegation. The FBI interviewed everyone Ford said was there or could vouch for her story. They did. They came up with exactly no one that could verify her story. If Senators had not voted to confirm him it would have been out of mob rule and not any kind of finding of fact.
You are simply upset that your preferred outcome did not happen. That’s not injustice. That’s democracy.
His response is right out of the Liberal playbook. They agreed to the terms then bitched when the truth bit them in the ass again. They usd this woman as a tool to attack an innocent man and are kicking her to the curb now that their insane gamble failed. Feinstein should rot in hell for leaking her name against her wishes. The moral and intellectual bankruptcy of the left is a sight to behold.
- 1
- 1
-
59 minutes ago, Texas73 said:
Do people not realize that Dr. Ford's testimony is evidence?
Evidence of what? That’s she’s batshit crazy?
- 1
- 2
-
1 hour ago, Gil Bang said:
Those were 0/hr attorneys, dipshit.
It’s cute that you believe that. Someone was paying them. Just not their crazy bitch client.
- 1
- 2
-
5 minutes ago, Anastasis said:
The single most pivotal aspect of all of this is that the FBI wasn't called in immediately. They would have wrapped in 3 days. Their findings would have been presented to the committee. The WH totally shit the bed.
What exactly would they investigate?
- 1
- 1
-
13 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:
Hmm, you raise an interesting point. Sounds like we need to investigate these claims. If only there were a collection of federal investigators, a bureau if you will, who were trained to investigate crimes like these. If only...
You mean the same group that investigated him for months and found none of this?
-
2 hours ago, Brisketexan said:
Yeah....I know some pretty livid women. Including a woman who was the victim of a pretty horrific assault who was visibly shaken up by the news of the day, and had a man tell her “that was 35 years ago! They were probably just fooling around and now she regrets it!”
If you’re a woman who has been assaulted, the messaging remains pretty relentless: if you dare make an accusation, you won’t be believed, you’ll be mocked and belittled, and you will be put on trial, not the rapist.
This has nothing to do with “due process,” to which everyone is entitled. It’s about treating victims with decency and humanity.
Imagine being a woman who has been assaulted. Think about the message that they’re getting, loud and clear. That’s some fucked up shit.CSB
I know several women who are horrified their sons could have their lives destroyed by an accusation with no proof so I’m not sure what your anecdotal evidence proves.
- 1
- 3
-
1 hour ago, bad_teammate said:
It's a he said/she said.
In this specific instance, the "she" has a lot more credibility than the "he".
It’s cute that you believe this.
-
1 hour ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
Do you think it’s fucked up that those women don’t give a shit that a potential Supreme Court Justice tried to rape someone?
He did?
2018 midterm gameday thread
in Cloak Room
Posted
Keep sucking that Liberal Dick, Aggie.