-
Posts
873 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Crusher
-
-
2 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:
lulz at 5 guys with a pad and pen. someone didn’t get their talking points straight.
the sitroom has a voice recognition readout of the actual transcript. what was released was a summary they thought would clear them, because they’re buffoons.
the transcript is on a code-word server reserved for matters of national security, not embarrassing/illegal phone calls.
misusing this server is evidence of a cover-up. someone without clearance put it there. also not legal. it’s been used several times before - again, not ok.
stick with your whataboutism, it’s your only possible way to jumble the nonsense and confuse the rubes. shit, it’s worked so far.
OK Henry I'll Bite: If this is such a super secret why are you telling everyone on the board about it?
Wow.. are you Secret Service? I am so impressed.
-
32 minutes ago, VRHorn said:
70 -30 might be the most incredibly fucking stupid thing anyone has ever posted on this site, and @Johnny Sack still posts here.
Well, we will see.
I can't believe that you took the time to go back and neg every single post I made tonight.
You really should charge me some rent. How bout 5$ a post.
-
11 minutes ago, VRHorn said:
Sorry, I seem to have missed your opus.
You believe that the people fighting Drumph are trying to “sweep the USA away”?
Fuck yourself with a chainsaw.
Well I guess this is where are. I have given a little of my self here, how bout you tell me where you are coming from?
I can't believe that all you have for your cause is "fuck you with a chainsaw". Yuk Yuk
-
1 hour ago, Js1 said:
Y’all wasting your time more than Trump trying to get Melania to answer her bedroom door these days.
You are so smart with that quote. I wish I could be half as smart as you.
- 1
-
23 minutes ago, The People’s Elbow said:
No. Just you.
Well. Show some proof that I am a liar.
If not you are an asshole who just jumps into threads where he feels safe that no one will fight back because you have smarter people than you covering your back.
????
-
7 minutes ago, David Dennison said:
You seem to be a lot concerned.
Yes I am.
I thought my last reply to you would have clued you in to what I am actually about.
Trump is a tool. Useful at the moment.
I just disagree with a movement that seems to be trying to sweep the USA away.
- 2
-
1 minute ago, scottsins said:
^
Still pretending to not know what the English word “transcript” means.
Let me try and say something as important as your last reply....
You are a douche.
- 4
-
1 minute ago, scottsins said:
Now you don’t know what “transcript” means. Are you for real or is this a bit?There is no recording of the conversation. So a "transcript" in this case is 5 people with pad and paper. After the call they all get together and combine their notes. That becomes the "transcript".
Are you calling all 5 of those folks liars?
-
OK.. Reaching.. If that was all I had I would be a little concerned.
-
15 minutes ago, David Dennison said:
When people who actually heard the phone call testify as to the contents of the transcript, then it will be direct evidence.
There are also more phone calls that were inappropriately classified.
Donald Trump is in a bad spot.
But good luck with your talking points.
Who are these people and when would they testify? The same people that heard the Ukrainian call live and didn't have a problem with it and didn't file a whistleblower complaint?
You guys are reaching. Reaching so bad.
- 4
-
15 minutes ago, Ted Lange said:
Neither was Christine Blasey Ford.
- 6
-
1 minute ago, David Dennison said:
It's a piece of circumstantial evidence which can be used by a finder of fact to make a determination that it is raining outside.
Circumstantial evidence is all you and all the jackasses that you appear to lead (with a little help from Hugo) appear to have.
What do you really think is going to happen? I will tell you what I think is going to happen.
1. Trump will get Impeached in the House.
2. Trump will get acquitted in the Senate.
3. Trump will get re-elected by about a 70-30 margin in 2020.
What happens after that I guess is up to the knuckleheads everywhere in the country. The majority of the people in this country are not ready for socialism or globalism. To effect globalism you must bring down the USA not raise up the rest of the world. It is impossible.
Even the most deplorable citizens of the USA know they it have better than most of the world. You are not gonna convince them otherwise.
- 8
-
5 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:
You asking for evidence while ignoring circumstantial evidence is infuriating. If you were in a windowless room and someone walked in with a wet umbrella, you’d be screaming for proof that it’s raining. Do me this favor though, Where is the word for word transcript and how did it get there?
There might be a busted water pipe in the hall way to the windowless room. No proof it's raining outside?
- 2
-
1 minute ago, Ted Lange said:
And yet our President Is infinitely dumber and more corrupt and a serial liar and serial adulterer and a crook...
OK.. You're not really going that way are you? The last President to get Impeached was indicted for lying about a blow job. A blow job!!! If he had just told the truth we were ready to forgive him. What's that old saying? The cover up is usually worse than the crime.
Some people just can't change their nature.
- 6
-
6 minutes ago, David Dennison said:
He should have never been given the opportunity to make that ruling. It should have never been handed to DOJ without being handed to Congress.
Before the law firm / political org that wrote that complaint they should have made sure they knew the law.
- 3
-
Good game!!! 2 More to go. Lets win them both.
-
12 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
OMG... Why don't you tell us what 8 yro niece thinks too? Like wow ...
- 15
-
Just now, David Dennison said:
He buried the complaint.
No he didn't. It wasn't a legal Whistle Blower complaint to begin with. He just made the ruling.
It's good to be the President.
- 9
-
10 minutes ago, Irwin F Fletcher said:18 minutes ago, Crusher said:Man wake up. Everyone knows that the Repubs started the Dossier and the Dems took it up a notch with the DNC cut out law firm Perkins Coie and Fusion GPS.
Well, maybe not if all you have been watching MSNBC and CNN. You will find out what really happened when Barr's report on FISA abuse come out.
Personally I think this is what all this Ukrainian shit is about. Trying to make one last splash before the truth comes out.Barr's got bigger things to worry about now. His ass is about to be dragged in front on Congress once again. His good old boy stammering isn't going to play as well the second time.
For what? He didn't do shit.
He's like the guy in the back seat on the way home from a party where the guy driving the car is getting berated by his old lady in the passenger seat. My name is Paul and this is between y'all.
- 5
-
7 minutes ago, David Dennison said:
Because FISA court judges are easily duped.
No I don't think that at all. That is why I thinks there was a very concerted effort to fool them.
- 3
-
Just now, David Dennison said:
He didn't threaten to withhold the aid, he did withhold it.
Then he made the phone call and asked for a favor.
Ukraine got their money dude. What do you want?
You guys gonna have too find something better than this. It ain't moving the needle. People are seeing the Biden shit and are saying what the fuck?
Biden and the rest of the 20 Democrats running against Trump are the swamp. Trump was right. Look how these career politicians lie. The 60 million that voted for Trump is just getting larger. Not smaller. Trump will win in 2020. It's done.
Now what we should try to do under Trumps second term is figure out a way we can all just get along.
- 12
-
3 minutes ago, Ted Lange said:
Because a Republican running against Trump in the GOP primary hired him. There is a difference in using your own money to investigate a political rival than using your power as president to bribe a foreign country into manufacturing information on your rival. One is legal the other isn’t. I mean the GOP SCREAMS from the rooftops how they are the party of law and order. Until the fucking dumbass they elected breaks the law. Fucking phonies
Man wake up. Everyone knows that the Repubs started the Dossier and the Dems took it up a notch with the DNC cut out law firm Perkins Coie and Fusion GPS.
Well, maybe not if all you have been watching MSNBC and CNN. You will find out what really happened when Barr's report on FISA abuse come out.
Personally I think this is what all this Ukrainian shit is about. Trying to make one last splash before the truth comes out.
- 4
-
1 minute ago, David Dennison said:
We enlist the aid of foreign governments in political campaigns all the time?
Really?
Yeah, apparently. Why was the Australian Ambassador sent to set up some rube named Pappadopoulos ?
Why was Christopher Steele in Russia gathering anything he could find to put in the Trump dossier? Most now proven false and possibly Russian counter intelligence?
Apparently this is the way we have always been doing our elections. Or just perhaps an outsider happened to look like he might have a chance and the wheels were put in motion. They are still spinning today.
- 7
-
7 minutes ago, Hugo Stiglitz said:
Trump wanted Ukraine to manufacture a Biden scandal for him. It’s that’s simple. That was the plan.
It was already happening .
- 8
What's going on with this DNI Whistleblower ?
in Cloak Room
Posted
OK.. So what does it mean? Tell me how Trump broke the law. Just once? What has Trump done that has broken the law, Not what you think , but what you can prove!!!