Jump to content

BoomerSooner2578

banned
  • Posts

    97
  • Joined

Posts posted by BoomerSooner2578

  1. 2 minutes ago, CHIEF said:

     If he picks an innovative snot-nose, the coordinators he is giving them are better than they could have ever hoped to draw by themselves.

    I agree with everything you said about Mike Stoops, but I don't get what you're saying here. OU's D has improved SO much under Grinch with Mike's recruits being the upper-classmen. 

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Fuck You 6
  2. 3 minutes ago, Longhornlove said:

    How is this trolling? Ugh.........this is a Longhorn forum and your screen name is Boomer Sooner. 

    Trolling is defined as creating discord on the Internet by starting quarrels or upsetting people by posting inflammatory or off-topic messages in an online community. Basically, a social media troll is someone who purposely says something controversial in order to get a rise out of other users.

     

    Honestly, you posting in this forum is inflammatory but I will  give you credit for not hiding your true allegiance.

    it's on topic. it's not trolling.

    • Fuck You 8
  3. 4 minutes ago, TexasEx said:

    GTFO gooner. We don't give a shit what you think. Enjoy getting your shit pushed in this year ;) 

    There's much to learn in others' experiences, and mistakes. I'm not trying to start a "OU vs. UT" thing. Just look at what happened when Riley kept Mike Stoops on. Let your DC assemble his own staff, and be autonomous. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Fuck You 9
    • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
  4. 2 minutes ago, Hookem2147 said:

    Ah, yes, he’s “rushing things” as we are sitting here two weeks after he was hired and still don’t have a complete staff.

    I'm saying, "get the DC first, keep your hands off the defense, and let the DC hire his own staff." Learn from OUr mistakes, there's plenty. Mainly, not firing Mike Stoops in 2017 on DAY ONE.

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Fuck You 12
  5. Don't agree with hiring defensive assistant coaches / position coaches without the DC's consent. Sark should know better than that... he's rushing things when it's not necessary. We paid through OUr asses when an offensive genius took over as HC. We learned... "Hey, you're an offense mastermind, please do not dabble in defense, and please hire who the best minds tell you to, and leave them in autonomy."

    Sark reminds me of OUr offensive mastermind, who should take advice, and keep his hands off the defense. You guys saw Mike Stoops! That's a lesson- in what one should never do. Riley should have fired Mike Stoops day one. Instead he gave him a "chance" (poor decision).

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Fuck You 39
  6. 2 hours ago, Beantown Express 2.0 said:

    1) Show up with a real staff of great assistant coaches

    2) Recruit a few key guys for NSD #2 and fill holes in roster with portal transfers.

    3) Recruit like a witch for 2022 and the future.

    4) Beat every team on our schedule that has less talent than us.

    5) Profit.

    Do that and the rest will take care of itself.  

    I think he'll do that, and many naysayers will be pleasantly surpirised. HE knows how to get the most out of Robinson and Thompson. Moreso than Herman would have. Think about it.

    • Hook 'Em 1
  7. 13 minutes ago, BradInATX said:
    24 minutes ago, BoomerSooner2578 said:
    My post #295 is no different than this post. I don't understand the difference RE: reaction.

    Hey. Go fuck yourself.

    Done. tubesock. Took less than one minute. Back in the game. 

    Now, I want an answer, Why are the same posts so diametrically opposed / different than the other? It's the same post!

    • Fuck You 4
  8. 2 hours ago, BoomerSooner2578 said:

    You guys are bringing up shit from when he was out-of-control drinking. 

    I know I said, "I'll leave", but this is simply too much to ignore. He HAS to be clean, and Mike Stoops is not going to be your DC, and likely not a position coach. Sark was talented when he WAS addicted to / abusing alcohol. I realize that this post will get me AT LEAST fifteen more "fuck you" reactions, but UT would not have hired him if he was not clean and sober. 

    Stop thinking about / over-analyzing the alcoholic Sark, and be open to the guy that is clean now.  

    My post #295 is no different than this post. I don't understand the difference RE: reaction.

  9. Goddamn, "fuck you" left and right, and no one has even bothered to answer the honest questions. I'd wager that Sark is clean, and I'm sorry that you didn't land Urban Meyer, but have hope. 

     

    Broyles Award

    • Hook 'Em 3
    • Like 1
    • Haha 3
    • Fuck You 6
    • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
  10. K, my questions are...

    "It's not resonable to think Sark would hire Mike Stoops, as he has not been clean for long enough to be selected as a reasonable choice for DC at UT. Why would anyone think he would be?"

    "Don't you think licensed private investigators have vetted Sark's alcohol intake enough to satisfy the powers that be at UT?"

    I think UT would be OK with a recovering alcoholic, who won the Broyles, but not OK with Mike Stoops, who needs more time (and for all we know may still be drinking compusively.)

    One is more likely to beat their alcoholism if they have hope in life, and I'll bet he's been clean.

    I'd have hired Bill O'Brien, but this may not be the catastrophe many of you are making it out to be. 

    (Qualifier: I don't want anything to happen at UT that upsets the balance of OU beating Texas at the rate Riley has been) So, take that for what it's worth. Food for thought. 

    • Fuck You 19
×
×
  • Create New...