Jump to content

Hellraiser97

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    232
  • Joined

Posts posted by Hellraiser97

  1. So, I posted about this on another threat about a year ago, but my 7yo tested as ridiculously smart in most categories, but also borderline ADD.  They said normally this wouldn't be an issue, but due to her intelligence, it is.  Was recommended some ADHD coaching/therapy.  Left this in charge of my soon to be ex and we ended up at a place call the Peak Performance Institute.  They did a Quantitative EEG analysis that showed that basically her brain kind of misfires.  I researched it some and this thing seems largely legit.  The place that did her testing last year confirmed its legit.  It was also suggested we do Heart Rate Variability Training.  Again, original place said its a good idea.

    Sooooo, they don't take insurance.  I've found one other place, Austin Biofeedback, that does this, but also doesn't take insurance.  We can file after the fact with insurance (BCBS for us), but the insurance wants to pre-approve and they've dragged their heals.  The new thing is they say they need something from Peak Performance Institute (which those people say they never have had to provide before).  Total cost of the therapy if we can't get anything covered is between $10k and $17k.  

    So, anyone do this before?  I'm no doctor, but what they've said makes sense and I haven't found anyone calling total bullshit on it.  

  2. There's some monks up in Upstate NY that train GSD for this exact purpose.  It's expensive, but I've met one of these dogs with its family before.  I've been around dogs my whole life, lots of GSD, and that dog, while not unfriendly or aggressive, was fucking intimidating.  

    Whatever you decide to do, if you do get a big dog like that for protection, make sure you get it very, very well trained.  It needs to respond to EVERYONE in the family.

    • Like 1
  3. On another note, for my actual reading, I'm on the second book of Sanderson's first Mistborn trilogy. The first book it took me a while to get into it. The last third or so if it, I really liked it. So I'm on book two, Well of Ascension. I'm about 1/3 through and it's enjoyable but once again, not loving it. I find the world interesting but I think the issue is that I don't feel any real attachment to most of the characters. In the first book, it was the same deal, with the exception of one or two.

    I do not like OU

  4. You should check out his Alex Benedict series. I like it a lot more than the Academy series. And some of his standalone books like Moonfall were enjoyable.
    Thanks I'll put it on my list! I'm on Book 7 of Academy, Starhawk. I don't hate it but it's a bit weird for two reasons. First, instead of focusing on some specific event, like the other books, it's really just about how Hutch got started it seems. Second, it's a different narrator and I swear she makes every character sounds like they're willing.

    I do not like OU



  5. All I'm saying is he left the program in better condition than what he inherited. 


    And you're wrong. After the years, we had as many holes or more in our depth chart as when he started and a team full of guys that had no idea if how to win or even an expectation of it. Literally, these guys had never experienced a winning college football season. That losing attitude is harder to fix than lack of talent. The guys Mack left at least had a winning attitude.

    I do not like OU

  6. If developers didn’t have the government helping them get rid of the poors and families (under 65), gentrification would slow tremendously. 
     
    Hahahahaha

    Have the government helping us?!? Shit with friends like that, who needs enemies? There government could barely be hindering us more if they tried! They already add between$25k and $50k in costs per project with a ridiculous number of fees, inspections, etc. Then they make it so that at most you can build a duplex on most lits, and not even that on many, so there's no way to reduce land cost per unit.



    I do not like OU

  7. 3 hours ago, NeverMarryAStripper said:

    Good luck getting elected in Texas on a let's implement a state income tax platform.

    Yup.  Hopefully, we'll get some elected officials that are open to the idea, even if they aren't campaigning on it.  My new rep, Vikki Goodwin is like that.  She won't say it outright, but read between the lines and its there.


    Of course, we'll just get fucked most likely and have a state income tax AND high property taxes.

    • Like 1
  8. It's not a popular opinion, but we really need to just scrap the entire property tax scheme and implement an income tax.  People freak out at that, but most people would likely benefit from it.  As an example of how screwed our system is:

    My best year in NYC, I made about 50% more than my best year I've had since moving back.  I paid less in combined state income taxes, city income taxes and property taxes that year than I have paid in property taxes each of the three years I've been back.  And New York is considered a 'high' income tax state.

    Just look at how fucked up it is.  Live in something like Circle C, and you have a house in the half million dollar range and pay about $10k in property taxes per year, even if you only make $100k.  That's literally a 10% tax rate.  Conversely, someone who lives in a different part of the state, where property values are lower and harder to get accurate estimate due to lower turnover and you may have a property on the tax rolls at $150k and only pay $3k in property taxes, even if you make $250k, $500k, etc.  

    Obviously most people aren't making $250k, $500k, etc., but it illustrates how the system is upside down.  The middle class basically gets screwed in our system. 

    • Like 5
  9. 1 hour ago, crash_davis said:

    california has an answer which makes a ton of sense.  for over a certain age, prop tax is grandfathered at last sale.

    https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/networth/article/How-older-CA-homeowners-can-get-property-tax-6778070.php

    but we don't have a state income tax.  state needs to generate income somehow so other taxes will increase or state will find new ways of taxing.  in the end, the state is going to get their money.  just depends on who pays and at what %.

    The argument that seniors are getting pushed out due to property taxes is basically a lie.  Most of the taxes freeze at what you paid at 65.

    • Like 1
  10. You know what these developers are fucking up old neighborhoods all over Austin and many of these areas are causing people that have lived there for a long time and have paid off their houses to sell and move because their taxes are way more than their house payment ever was.

     

    Fuck those money grabbing assholes.

    I suggest everyone in this position to develop the "Keep Austin Weird" idea and put neon and art all over the yards.

    More power to them.

    Fuck the investors in the dog smelling ass. 

    Developers don't do any of that. Demand does that and we don't control that. Don't be an idiot. God I'd love if I could manufacture demand

     

    I do not like OU

     

     

     

    • Like 1
  11. 3 hours ago, irishtexan said:

    Neighbor can do whatever the fuck she wants. It's her house. And she was there first. You mean to tell me that these two jamokes built two houses and never at any point noticed the eccentric "keep austin weird" lady? C'mon. 

    It's more that she went from eccentric to BATSHIT with an intention of fucking with the dumbass 'developers'.  I'm in general a fan of eccentric, but if someone ever installed neon pink lighting to intentionally shine into one of my projects... well, it would quite a coincidence that some guys showed up in the middle of the night smashed/stole all the neighbors 'art'.

  12. They invested three quarters of a million dollars to put in condos and are upset that they're not gonna get rich. I'm shocked they can't find two people to pay half a million dollars+ for a home that shares a wall with someone else. Shocked I tell you!
    That's not a problem to find. They just didn't build something that actually would still for that. This is what happens in hot markets. People think they can do this for after watching HGTV and looking at Pinterest.

    That said the neighbor is kind of an asshole.

    I do not like OU

    • Like 1
  13. Providing for your family with an NFL salary is a little different than just finding a job with your general studies degree.  VY or Colt may have a cushy job to always fall back on, but is that the same for all other players?
    Sure it's different. That's why it's a bullshit argument. It isn't like this is their only chance to earn a living, just maybe to hit a home run.

    I doubt any of them would be have trouble getting a job, maybe not a cushy job, but they will be able to no provide just fine

    I do not like OU

  14. Besides the day we start being petty on people trying to provide for their families is the day our recruiting dies.
    If somebody wants to sit out the Sugar Bowl well good luck to them. And if we win, no hard feelings.
    They'll be able to provide for their families regardless. No Texas ex player is every going to have trouble finding a job if they are at least reasonably competent.

    I do not like OU

  15. Just had another thought. Maybe this selfishness is a good thing. It makes the non CFP bowl games, even the new years 6, devalued. Playing a game with your stars is a joke and is bad for college football so maybe this will pay the NCAA to get rid of all the bowls and expand the CFP
    to 16, 20, 24 teams. Probably not, but we can hope

    I do not like OU

  16. Do you think Christian McCaffrey regrets sitting out Stanford’s bowl game?
    Do you think Jaylon Smith is glad he did play in Notre Dame’s?
    Maybe  it’s unfair to bring up Smith as such an extreme example, but we’re talking life changing money at risk for one game.  I just don’t have a problem with them sitting out. I don’t buy in to the individual being on the hook for the insurance either.  The juice isn.t remotely worth the squeeze. It seems some of y’all were never broke college students or parents.  There’s not just money floating around in your life everywhere.
    I agree with Helobius(ugggh!!!) that a player who ends up doing well in the pros, like a Durant; or McCaffrey does infinitely more for their school as an ambassador of what can happen as a result of their development at Texas or Stanford.
     
    The chances of having a career ending injury are small, even the chances of having an injury that hurts your draft spot are small. It can happen, but it's small.

    I see no difference in sitting out a bowl game vs sitting out there end of the season. If their future rearming potential is the only thing that matters, then why not sit out as soon as your team is eliminated from CFP contention, or conference championship contention?

    Winning the sugar bowl this year is readily as important to our program as winning the Big12 title would have been, but by your logic, all these guys should have started sitting out after the WVU loss as we were eliminated from the CFP by that point and most, if not all, haven't changed their draft position significantly since.

    College Athletics is not just a minor league for the NFL. If we're going to start treating it as such, then we should just start paying these guys and eliminate any academic requirements for them.



    I do not like OU

  17. Kevin Durant sat out his last 3 seasons if you want to have that fucking mindset.
    He didn't sit it the NCAA tournament. Granted different than s non cfp bowl game. I'm not a fan of players leaving early, especially after freshman year but you at least complete your season

    I do not like OU

  18. 1 hour ago, Rimbo said:

    You're mostly right, but let's not get so mad at Strong that we end up rewriting history for the cause.

    "he had enough talent to win 8 games his last year" -- yes, and they graduated that same year. The players that won the few games we did in subsequent years were Strong's recruits, not Mack's. The ones who transferred didn't get much done, either.

    "He wasn't that great at Louisville" -- Few people recognized that at the time. At the time, his name was as hot as anyone's not named "Saban." The problem is that the "hot" coaching hire isn't the one you necessarily want -- I remember Gary Barnett being the hot name when Mack was hired (thus texlarry's famous "I'm stunned. I'm pissed" comment), but Barnett turned out to be a dud, and Mack reset our standards for winning, even getting us to a couple of MNC games and winning one of them.

    Umm, there were plenty of guys from the 13 squad playing on the 14 and plenty of our commits were before Mack even had been fired.  

    There's no rewriting history with Strong at Louisville.  If the old board wasn't dead, you could see plenty of people questioning the hire for those very reasons.  Strong got hired because we couldn't get Saban or Briles (thankfully).  After that, it was the media going on about how poor Charlie Strong waited soooooooooo long for his chance to be a head coach, constantly being passed over until finally Louisville game him a shot and then it was just all about his record those last two seasons (with zero analysis about the quality of those wins).  Then you add in the people like the poster earlier that just think we HAD to give a black coach a chance due to prior sins and A&M having hired one already.  Remember the bug wig idiots that wanted to hire Dennis fucking Green instead of Mackovic?  They were still around.  There was pretty much zero chance we were hiring anyone except Strong at that point.

    • Like 2
    • Fuck You 1
  19. 2 hours ago, Napoleon said:

    Vince didn't teach Defense and neither did Mack.

    So my point still stands, Mack didn't coach shit. He just came along for the ride.

    No, Mack wasn't supposed to teach shit.  His job was to recruit and hire the right guys to do the coaching.  Obviously we all felt GDGD was subpar, but he could have been a lot worse, and outside of Akina and _iaz, his DC hires were pretty damn good.

×
×
  • Create New...