Jump to content

Burnt Orange in OC

crowd sourced
  • Posts

    45
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Burnt Orange in OC

  1. 2 minutes ago, Lobo said:

    Oh you're really not gonna like what happens next to his gun, mate.  

    You are certainly one of the more interesting computer generated bot posters on here.  

    I couldn't care less what happens to the defendant, so long as the judge and jury act in accordance with the law.

    Unfortunately, the law is of little consequence to most Americans these days, as we begin to succumb to mob rule and what we "believe" to be right based on the pronouncements of a very unreliable media and those voices that effectively "seize the narrative." 

    • Fuck You 21
  2. 54 minutes ago, MadBurgerMaker said:

    Yeah better roll up on him with some guns and try to grab him for going into a construction site. 

    But what does the law say? 

    Is the trial taking place in a court of law or in a court of what the people want regardless of what the law says? (n.b. Someone here previously noted that Georgia has changed the law that was on the books at the time regarding citizen's arrest and confronting individuals suspected of violating the law.)

    Because it's a slippery slope back to a world we don't want to live in if we're going to ignore the law and just go with feelings.

    • Fuck You 21
  3. 11 minutes ago, 'stache said:

    I thought it was always out there that they were fighting for the gun. Arbery's only instinct at the time was to try and disarm the fucking guy pointing a gun at him for no reason. He has that fucking right. The confrontation should never have occurred in the first place. Guilty As Fuck.

    You say "pointing a gun at him for no reason." But Arbery is on video as having just committed a crime.
    You say he has the right to fight for the gun. That would be self-defense. Why doesn't the fellow at whom he's pointing the gun then have the same right to self-defense? 

    The whole thing's a cluster... I'm mainly just making the point that the media has done a very poor job of explaining that Arbery had a gun when he was shot. I would venture to say 98% of the American public is unaware of that not so minor detail.  
     

    • Fuck You 28
  4. 12 minutes ago, Captainant said:

    I'm guessing he felt it necessary because the propaganda show hannity put a spotlight on comments made over a year ago. And a fox reporter and son of a F&F host asked it yesterday in a media briefing. 

    But who am I kidding, yall weren't reasoned into your position. You certainly won't be reasoned out of it.

    Oh, and the key question. Did you even know the three people Rittenhouse shot were white?

    Also, let me note, the violence that occurs after the verdict is announced is going to be a direct result of the media perpetuating these lies. With accurate reporting of what had taken place for the past year, there would be nothing to protest. Instead, the sheeple will pour into the streets to again protest their perceived slight when a jury acquits a white supremacist who sought to kill "peaceful black protesters."

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Like 1
  5. 6 minutes ago, Captainant said:

    I'm guessing he felt it necessary because the propaganda show hannity put a spotlight on comments made over a year ago. And a fox reporter and son of a F&F host asked it yesterday in a media briefing. 

    But who am I kidding, yall weren't reasoned into your position. You certainly won't be reasoned out of it.

    And most people believing Kyle Rittenhouse deserves the death penalty probably relied on a lot of narratives that the media repeated yet were never true. 

    Did you know his father lived in Kenosha before the trial?
    Did you know he had been asked to defend the car lot? 
    Did you know he was legally in possession of the rifle? 
    Did you know he was attacked first, at the car lot, before firing his weapon? 

    The list goes on and on. 

    Naive kid? Yes.
    Not so bright? Absolutely.
    Lucky to be where he is in life given his meth head mom? For sure.

    But he wasn't a white supremacist who went hunting black protesters, yet that's exactly what media pundits CONTINUE to say.

     

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Like 1
  6. 5 hours ago, Texaspython said:

    Huh? The kid brought an assault rifle to tussle with people who weren’t armed. I bet you find that heroic. You too, are a wimp.

    Well, except for the guy who was pointing a handgun at him. And the guy who was pummeling him with a skateboard. But yeah, the first guy tried to take his weapon away from him, so they weren't all armed.

  7. 5 hours ago, blacklab said:

    Wrong. Did the president post in this thread? It was you trying to bring CR to here. If you want to discuss the president and what he said about this case take it to the cloak room. 
     

    ive just been deleting political posts but will start time off now. 
     

    If you wish further discussion of the moderation take it to the board discussion board. Any board discussion posts are going to be deleted from this thread

     

    • Fuck You 1
  8. 1 hour ago, DDD Dad said:

     

     

    CR ——>

    Sorry, but it was the pandering politician who brought the cloakroom into the case. When one of the two major party candidates for POTUS completely slanders a 17-year-old kid by labeling him a white supremacist, he needs to be held accountable. Hopefully Rittenhouse is a free man by the middle of next week and has an awesome civil attorney who will start shredding those individuals who slandered him and media outlets that committed libel here.

    • Hook 'Em 4
    • Like 1
    • Fuck You 1
  9. 5 hours ago, Thatguy said:

       GG wasn't charged because the law took into consideration that he thought there was an active shooter situation. Key phrase there was took into consideration.

    But the prosecution didn't take into consideration that GG was pointing a loaded firearm at Rittenhouse; that Rittemhouse was being wailed on with a skateboard by a convicted felon; and that Rittenhouse was being physically assaulted by another convicted felon who had tried to take his weapon .

    I guess he should have just said he thought there was a fourth night of rioting with massive property destruction and personal injury occurring. Oh, wait... that's why he's the sacrificial lamb here.

    • Like 1
    • Fuck You 1
  10. 46 minutes ago, Cheeseweasel said:

    Big. I think the only hope for the prosecution at this point would be a jury who feels like he needs to be guilty of "something". 

    Or a jury that's accurately aware that their city will burn for another four nights if he's acquitted and is willing to throw a naive, not-very-bright kid under the bus as a sacrificial lamb to the social justice movement.

    Also, if you saw the kid's mom on TV last night, you will realize he never, ever had a chance in life, "white privilege" be damned. Woman looked and sounded like she had cooked her brain on drugs '80s frying egg commercial style since she was 12. Couldn't put a complete sentence together and let's just say meth, it doesn't do a body good. 

    Best-case scenario for the kid is he gets acquitted and someone points him to the Covington Catholic High School's lawyer to start picking off media outlets, stars with Twitter accounts, and even Joe Biden for calling him a murderer and white supremacist.

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Like 1
  11. 1 hour ago, Bravo said:

    there is no way all 12 will convict on any murder charge. at best mistrial. then it wont ever be tried again.

    I'm afraid you underestimated the fear and laziness of people who live in this community. They've already seen it burn once (well, four times) and they know if they acquit him it will burn again. To (unjustly) throw one kid in prison for the rest of his life in order to prevent that kind of violence is a very feasible outcome, and why the trial should have been held somewhere else.

     

  12. 6 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

    Wow, did that really get published?  That's terrible.

    It's either Exhibit A in the appeal of a guilty verdict or Exhibit A in Rittenhouse's libel trial that gets settled out of court for an unrevealed high six-figure sum that the media will spin as "probably a few thousand dollars just to make it go away."

×
×
  • Create New...