PGFrog
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by PGFrog
-
-
Great win over the Chargers without their two starting offensive tackles.
Yes, there was a some ugly shit on offense, but that isn't going away this year and teams have gone a very long way with shitty offenses.
One last thing and it can't be stressed enough, FUCK RICH EISEN and I hope that fat bastard blows out both Achilles next time he tries to run a 40.
-
3 hours ago, gofuckyourself said: This is actually an understatement.
I was actively rooting against the "protagonist" about halfway through. Maybe that was the point, but it was just a terrible movie, poorly told. 130 minutes of shit and then it turns into multiple poorly done movie cliches at the end.
Before that the story was all luck and coincidence and absurd plot points. The soundtrack for some reason leaned on 80s pop for a film set in the 50s. Even that was dumb.
There wasn't anything interesting about it. Nothing. Except maybe George Gervin's cameo. As a Spurs fan that was legitimately the only redeeming thing about the film.
I went in knowing nothing. They could have made it a sports movie, which I thought it may have been, about a table tennis player and it could have been great.
The wife wanted to see this one. I now get to choose the next 5 movies minimally, just based on how shitty this choice was.

What you wrote pretty much was our conversation on the drive home.
The music never fit, there is nothing that makes you care about any of the characters outside of possibly Endo, and we did find ourselves guessing if that truly was George Gervin and who played the farmer who found the dog.
I truly believe this is a perfect example of people not wanting to call out total shit of a movie because of who made it, starred in it etc.....
-
-
2 hours ago, pch said: We debated between Song,Sung, Blue and Marty Supreme. Glad she won the debate after your report!
Our son wanted Anaconda simply for the comedy of the horrifically bad CGI snake from the trailers, my Wife wanted Song Sung Blue because she loves Diamond's music, but then our youngest swayed her Mom by telling her the movie wasn't about Neil.
I will openly admit that there were a few moments during the pile of shit that is Marty Supreme that I pondered changing our will and cutting our the youngest for this crime against the family.
-
6 minutes ago, nineliveslost said: He needs a solid GM that runs in NIL/recruiting and a great offensive coordinator. He will rock it if he gets that
Maybe so, he still has some pretty strong tendencies that I am not sure translate well and I am curious about the staff he brings in at Michigan.
We know the DC isn't coming with him and does the bulk of the staff stay with Scalley or go to Ann Arbor.
Whittingham is a guy who has coached at Utah for ~ 30 years, was in Idaho 3-4 years before that, and I can't recall where he started coaching.
Harding would be a key bring and while he has been at Utah for 12 years he is from Ohio so maybe he follows to Ann Arbor.
-
22 hours ago, Snake Diggity said: He was one of the 15 best prospects in the draft imho. Elite bat speed and power and doesn’t have a launch angle problem or a plate discipline issue. He will also have defensive value. It’ll boil down to his swing and miss against elite pitching but he could be a star.
Just for clarity sake, do the Astros now care about swing and miss tendencies?
-
Whittingham is going to be a very interesting choice.
He is 66, very old school on some things, hasn't been a huge fan of NIL, hasn't been known to crush recruiting, runs a dated offense that at times is very one dimensional and can be stopped easier than it should with the NFL talent they have had in the lines, and at times struggled in big games in conference.
Might be a home run, but I don't see much room between that or a big miss and not sure how much different this will be from the Rich Rod hire.
-
On 12/21/2025 at 8:19 AM, Chopper said: Ignore this post unless you want to laugh at the horrific taste of some insanely wealthy fuck from Ann Arbor https://www.redfin.com/MI/Ann-Arbor/414-S-Main-St-48104/unit-10/home/99381131


That sales person from Anderson Renewal made a damn good pitch catching this person coming out of the grocery store.
I fully understand that sentence makes very little sense, but even my word salad isn't as fucked up as those pictures. Did you purposefully try to come up with the ugliest rooms possible? That makes Gundy's place look ALMOST tasteful.
-
10 hours ago, pops said: So...talk to me like I'm 5. Isn't that a big deal? Is this a precursor to Max to merc or no?
I think the bigger question to me is whether or not we see Max make a move to other types of racing if RB can't put together a competitive car with the power unit which will be their first attempt to build one if I recall correctly.
Not sure if he can find another team in F1 that will give him the freedom and autonomy as he has at RB and I could see him moving into other types of racing.
-
-
7 hours ago, Hagbard Celine said:
all of the words written and spoken about the structure of college football miss this key point:
the name of the current structure is the Football BOWL Subdivision - the FBS
we are 11 years in to the new era of the Football PLAYOFF League - we're just pretending it doesn't exist yet
this season there were 136 teams in the FBS
for avoidance of doubt, in 1978 the ncaa split the "top" level of college football in to:
Division I-A (FBS): The top tier, which had specific criteria for membership, including average home game attendance requirements, 139 teams in 1978
Division I-AA (FCS): A new sub-level for programs that chose not to or could not meet the I-A criteria, which included a playoff system for a national championship, 38 teams in 1978this change was undertaken with the expectation that the ivy league would voluntarily drop down, but they did not and were forced out 3 years later after the rest of college football wrote draconian rules that were written specifically to force them out
there is precedent for a forced ejection of 8 schools in one stroke
despite the massive economic power (endowments) and political power (duh) behind the ivies, they did not litigate the ncaa and accepted their fate
this year, 2025, the ivies joined the fcs playoff field for the first time, 47 years after the split
espn went on the air 7 september 1979
0u broke the tv cartel in 1984
in 2025, cbs and nbc are irrelevant, disney and fox own the 2 big leagues, and the breakaway is going to happen, the question is how many teams, and the governance of spending
the ncaa is powerless to stop it
domer's de-indpendence is a foregone conclusion, and their existence in the College Premiership is in question....
private schools are possibly at risk of not making the cut due to sovereign immunity needed to inoculate the rebels from litigation
if i were a fan of one of these schools i would be concerned - as we saw during the last round of realignment the people at the top running universities are often..... deficient
acc
Boston College
Duke
Miami
Syracuse
Wake Forest
SMU
Stanfordrig12
Baylor
BYU
TCUb1g
Northwestern
USCsec
Vanderbilt
indy
Notre Dame
that's 14 private schools currently with a seat in the current round of musical chairs
their best defense against permanent exile would be to form their own conference immediately, today
they stand no chance at recourse if they are standalone entities when the long knives are unsheathed
We are have already been down this road before, been left for dead and based upon the loack of resources, time and energy committed to the program TCU was rightfully cast aside.
Here is a little secret, being left out of that group of 32 or 40 or whatever the number turns out to be in the end might not be such a bad thing.
Isn't matter of who is a poor or not when it comes to this, but who is wiling to continue to be lead around by the nose by the networks because right now I really can't think of who has really, truly benefitted from conference realignment the last few go arounds.
-
10 hours ago, William Bludworth said:
Indiana vs Georgia is my prediction, and I hope Indiana wins it all. I'm pulling for an upset for a team that no one knew existed before last season. If you have the balls to take on that job, and THEN proceed to make them dominant, I'm all for the chaos.
Last guy I remember who played for them was Antwaan Randle-El, and I don't even remember how long ago that was.
Just looked and he played from 2002-2010 and won a SB with Pitt.
Wait, Randle -El played for Indiana for damn near a decade?
Pavia's attorney is going to have a field day with that as a precedent.
-
23 hours ago, Iceman said:
I know Joey talks a lot of shit that hasn't been delivered upon, but he's right here.
Except it didn't work for BYU.
Oh, there is is also the small issue that becomes ND's AD actually represented them in the meetings and not a conference they have the sweet heart deal of an auto bid if they finish with a certain ranking sooooo, maybe Joey isn't right after all.
-
-
Edited by PGFrog
58 minutes ago, Steamboat1874 said:You could not be more wrong.
NIL and the portal are going to create more balance and better teams overall.
No school will be able to afford ten five stars anymore in a class.
Balance is not the same as quality.
When everyone is continually having to work in new players into systems and don't have the continuity then quality will be impacted.
-
3 hours ago, JBJ said:
Been looking through the actual news around the commissioner meetings. and leading proposals seem to be:
16: 5 + 11 - The most likely next format that no one likes but everyone will agree to not sue over.
16: 4-4-2-2 + 4 - P2 get 4 autos, M2 get 2 autos, 4 at-large - The SEC/B1G proposal, but B12 and ACC aren't ready to grant disproportional autos.
16: 4-4-4-4 - P4 get 4 autos. - The follow up from 4-4-2-2, the B12 is reluctant to cut out the G5 in the fear that it is next on the chopping block.
24: 4-4-4-4 + 8 - ACC wants a giant playoff
---
Expansion seems like ass at this point, but it's where decision-makers are heading. The B12 and ACC are probably right to not accept reality as the middle tier. I kind of don't like it either as the quality of conferences and teams changes over time, but the 4-4-2-2 format actually make the most sense at this singular moment in time. 16x 4-4-4-4 will put a lot of teams in that don't deserve to be while also blocking teams that do deserve to be. 24 just seems dumb.
Don't like the idea of 16 teams because I think the overall quality of teams is actually going to decline a bit with the continued reliance on transfers and players not staying in systems long enough to be developed into good college players.
Way too much dependence on athletic ability and systems that can be picked up quickly.
-
-
13 hours ago, Valmy77 said:
This is reactionary nonsense. Obviously nobody expected the ACC champ to be a five loss team. In like 99% of seasons there will only ever be one. Maybe change it so it will always be the P4 champs and the highest G5 champ. Whatever.
And there is no consistent way to always get 100% great matchups in every playoff game. So the G5 teams get blown out sometimes. Big whoop.
We had blowouts in the playoffs last year that did not even involve G5 schools. A G5 school didn't lost 65-7 to Georgia.
Everybody wants to panic and try to do radical change to fix things that are not even problems. The issue was that undefeated teams were getting left out of the post season. That problem is fixed. No deserving team will be left out again.
As far as splitting up the divisions into DI FCS, DI G5, and DIP4 well that shit isn't ever going to happen. So until this fantasy comes about I don't see why it is this enormous outrage that a midmajor plays in the playoffs. It happens in literally every other fucking sport. Every once in a while one will win a game or two and it will be cool. But it won't happen often.
Define "deserving" because that very definition seemed to be the issue yet again. Who deserved to be in and who didn't .
-
14 hours ago, Zeus said:
Everyone keeps saying G5
but there’s a bunch of shitty teams in all the conferences (mostly ACC and big12)
New playoff should be 6 SEC, 6 big10, 4 from ACC and Big12
small conferences are their own division and get their own playoffs
There aren't enough teams period to fill the 12 team play off let along your 20 team play off.
The problems extend beyond the committee and it goes to unbalanced conference schedules, conferences too damn big, and a selection process that is owned by a fucking network.
The college model that works at multiple levels is already in place.
If you don't want that then have the balls to go full NFL model which means 32 teams breaking off, but there is no way to fix this current shit and I basically saw two teams this weekend playing that looked like might belong in this thing and that was Oregon and Ole Miss. Everyone else was pretty much the same old shit yet again be it OU, Bama, ATM, or Miami. No need to see anymore of that.
-
-
-
-
-
Transfer Cycle 2025-2026 - This Is Fine
in 🤫$9.95🤫
Kind of terrible? He was total shit who wouldn't run between the tackles and lost his starting job to a wide receiver.