Jump to content

Irwin F Fletcher

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    2695
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Irwin F Fletcher

  1. "Trump was so focused on de-escalating the situation, that he didn't have time for calls or tweets.  He was meeting with National Guard, Capitol Police leadership, and his National Security team that he probably didn't even have his phone anywhere near him.  I mean, sure there'd be landline records of the Oval Office phone, and other secure White House lines.  But that's not important right now."  
    I mean, if Trump was truly serious about the storming of the Capitol, he would of gassed the protesters and walked over to the rotunda while awkwardly holding a bible upsidedown for a photoshoot.
    • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
  2. 5 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:

    While we're talking about things that are impossible, why don't we just get the Avengers to guarantee Ukraine's security?

    That'd be nice, but that whole Sokovia Accords prevents them from interfering. Frustrating for sure.

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Haha 6
  3. In addition to many other frailties of that lawsuit, it complains of actions that took place mostly before the 2016 election.
    The problem with that is that the Civil RICO statute of limitations is four years.  And most of the other claims are shorter than that.
    My bold prediction:  this lawsuit will be shot into the sun without whisky or hash browns.
    Can we make an exception this one time? We really need to have a good discovery process against Trump.

    If FAFO ever really meant something in regards to Trump, this would be it.
    • Haha 1
  4. 4 minutes ago, Bullneck said:

    So after Biden was sworn in I heard loose talk about Kavanaugh being impeached because his vetting was so slipshod.  Is that the process for getting rid of a justice?  Impeachment?

    Yes, that is correct. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
  5. Just couple of pearls from this "RICO" filling.

     

    316. The Plaintiff is entitled to recover, pursuant to Title 18 United States Code § 1964(c), treble damages in the amount to be determined by offer of proof at time of trial. The Plaintiff is also entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs of this litigation, as well as damages arising from lost profits and/or lost business opportunities attributable to the activities engaged in by defendants committed in furtherance of the Enterprise. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, Donald J. Trump, respectfully requests that this Court enter a Judgment for Donald J. Trump and against the Defendants, Hillary Clinton, HFACC, Inc., the Democratic National Committee, Perkins Coie, LLP, Michael Sussmann, and Marc Elias for damages, including Compensatory and Treble damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, and such further and other relief as this honorable Court may deem just and proper.

     

    323. As a direct and proximate result of RICO Conspiracy Defendants’ actions, the Plaintiff has been injured in his business and property has suffered, and continues to suffer, significant damages, including but not limited to, actual, compensatory, special, incidental, and consequential damages in addition to costs of defense and attorneys’ fees. 324. Among other things, the Plaintiff was forced to incur expenses in an amount to be determined at trial, but known to be in excess of twenty-four million dollars ($24,000,000) and continuing to accrue, in the form of defense costs, legal fees, and related expenses incurred in connection with his effort to defend against the Defendants’ actions and the various federal investigations and/or official proceedings arose therefrom. 325. The Plaintiff is entitled to recover, pursuant to Title 18 United States Code § 1964(c), treble damages in the amount to be determined by offer of proof at time of trial. The Plaintiff is also entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs of this litigation, as well as damages arising from lost profits and/or lost business opportunities attributable to the activities engaged in by defendants committed in furtherance of the Enterprise.

     

    328. At all relevant times, the Defendants acted with actual malice, as they knew that the Plaintiff was not colluding with Russia or, at a minimum, acted with reckless abandon as to the truth of whether the Plaintiff had colluded with Russia; despite said knowledge, the Defendants conspired to disseminate false information and spread a false narrative in an attempt to ruin the Plaintiff

  6. Kremlin says 4,000 but NATO says 40,000.
    I think I've heard this story before, maybe a couple of years ago.
    NATO uses the metric system. Hence the difference.
    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Haha 2


  7. "Many Generals" are contacting him for advice on how to get tough on Russia?  That story percolated earlier today and then conveniently ebbed away...


    I'm almost positive this was a Surly "tounge-in-cheek" post.
  8. I flip fox on every now and again to see what that side of the aisle is focused on. Yesterday they had Bill Barr on, and they meandered from Hunter’s laptop to Jackson’s hearing. Barr laid out the “republicans won’t turn it into a show like the dems did for Kavanaugh and Barrett” line, but then he went off script and said (paraphrasing) “but they did this with Trump’s cabinet nominees too, they held all of them up, republicans don’t do that.”  
     
    giphy.gif
    It just seemed like the left "held up" Trump's Cabinet appointments. The problem was Trump kept firing those who were somewhat competent and refused to suck the orange cock. I lost track of all the turnover under Trump.
  9. 37 minutes ago, immamac said:

    I think you discount how fucking stupid people are. He's not trolling he's just a complete fucking moron who believes crazy shit

    Well then, can you send him an DM saying you contacted Facebook and resolved his issues? 

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...