Jump to content

Chopper

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    8048
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Chopper

  1. The "perhaps we should have DOGE look at Elon" comment is not only some weak-tea, it confirms they were not looking at seeking revenge on Elon until now. So if you're trying to use something said today to bolster the argument you made 2 or 3 days ago about how the demented menace was surely going after musk, just know that I know you're not "smarter than" shit.

  2. 14 hours ago, atomheartbevo said:

    With that said, he publicly told Musk he better watch himself and not go after Republicans, or there would be "serious consequences" so he's flexed on Musk.

    So you're saying there's a chance of serious consequences? Not that I'm against it!

    image.png.82d3b1c7cf255911533bb62ac9d92cf6.png

    edit - had wrong tweet pasted

     

    Behold the beauty of FSD.

    image.thumb.png.40dc1e87ebe53378db38197dcc0cd421.png

     

    • Hook 'Em 1
  3. 6 hours ago, Im_smarter_then_you said:

    My buddies love to call me a child molester when we are fake beefing

    I don't really care what you and your buddies do behind closed doors.  But I guess it'll be a mystery for now why the guy who seeks revenge for everything -- and also to be 'right' about literally everything -- is just letting muSSk slide on his insults and much more. As I said, it's just a suspicion and I don't think it's unreasonable. I'm much more certain that muSSk gives zero fucks about the NTSB looking into safety issues. LOL If the bloated orange fascist wanted revenge they all know muSSk is very vulnerable and his weaknesses definitely aren't under the jurisdiction of NTSB or FHWA ffs. 

     

  4. image.thumb.png.55de768a551be67a991ac04171f94a2e.png

    https://coloradosun.com/2025/06/23/roadless-rule-reversal-colorado-federal-lands/

    Quote

     

    “An attack on the Roadless Rule is an attack on clean water, wildlife, Western communities, and recreation on public lands,” Hamby said afterward. “For over two decades, the Roadless Rule has protected intact ecosystems from irresponsible timber companies who want to clear cut the mature and old-growth forests that provide clean drinking water and recreation opportunities to Westerners, as well as healthy habitat for wildlife. 

    “It’s ridiculous for Secretary Rollins to spin this as a move that will reduce wildfire risk or improve recreation. Commercial logging exacerbates climate change, increasing the intensity of wildfires.”

     

     

    • Rage+1 5
  5. Israeli sources and IAEA

    image.thumb.png.ba1e9e46a8b915dd5fb25f0137270c50.png

     

    JD Vance:

    image.thumb.png.90efcbc7cd6844eedb02cb331b594242.png

    "Satellite images"

    image.thumb.png.ff6b0195b4716b4f001e4e06fee80782.png

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/vance-hints-uranium-was-moved-after-trump-tipped-off-tehran/

    image.thumb.png.0257bc5e1c9e4863332758084e43a198.png

     

    adding - of course there's one micro-dicked peabrain in the WH who disagrees with the obvious conclusion, and who got the sads from a pathetic parade on his birthday and then watched the tv showing Israeli fighter jets dominate the skies, giving him a pathetic need to act like a tough guy.

    Spoiler

    image.png.b1d37205d671fe680f7bfb647a85af30.png

     

    • Haha 2
    • Fuck You 1
  6. Just now, Duane Moore said:

    Since it seems like you haven’t heard of Soleimani before, I’d recommend this long profile on him by Dexter Filkins in the Atlantic from 2013. He was an undeniably bad dude. 
     

    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/09/30/the-shadow-commander

    Okay bro, cool. If the answers to my questions were so obvious, why did you have to run off to grok to get an answer and then pretend like you wrote it? Again, you still haven't answered either question, which is fine, we'll end it there. It's obvious you don't have an answer. 

    • Fuck You 1
    • Drool 1
  7. 3 hours ago, Duane Moore said:

    Fingers crossed, but so far this is following the precedent of the Soleimani strike and response. We’ll see if Iran has more, but they seem to be signaling this is it:

    Hey catch me up on what the Soleimani strike did for the US. While no US soldiers died in the Iran response, 7 or 8 had their brains scrambled. For what purpose? What person of any note whatsoever thought it was a good idea?

     

    1 hour ago, Bateshorn said:

    I find it a little hard to believe that over the course of a week since the war started, with air superiority, the Israelis just watched the Iranian's back up trucks to Fordrow and load it up with an unidentified cargo and drive away. Or the US overhead satellites feeding intelligence to the IDF. 

    The article sources two separate israelis in the intelligence field with direct knowledge of the situation. 

    1 hour ago, Laxtonto said:

    My guess is

    FFS, Dotard was tweeting about the need to evacuate Tehran a week ago, well before the flights over the Pacific.

    50 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

    Also, the fact that your beliefs on this matter align more or less completely with the nutjobs leading our country and religious extremists like Johnny Sack should give you at least a little pause.

    Did you intend to address that q to yourself?

×
×
  • Create New...