Jump to content

Hornmatic

Full Members
  • Posts

    130
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hornmatic

  1. 13 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

    Bobby had an interesting point on Agbo. That if he could get down to 260-270 and keep or increase athleticism that he could become a good inline tight end.

    Scipio mentioned something similar a few weeks ago but in relation to the portal instead of Agbo. Said everyone thinks we’ll go after a down the field threat but if there is a great 260 lb inline TE out there that could pose just as many matchup problems the way sark likes to deploy two te sets. 

    Interesting that guy could already be on campus  

     

  2. On 1/5/2024 at 6:42 AM, LTtxfan said:

    Time to turn the page... Thanks Guys !!! 🤘

    Likely or have declared for the NFL:

    • Xavier Worthy*
    • Jonathan Brooks*
    • T'Sweat
    • Byron Murphy*
    • Adonai Mitchell
    • Ja'Tavion Sanders
    • Jahdae Barron
    • Jaylan Ford

    * Already declared

    --------------------------------------------

    Others likely gone or out of eligibility:

    • JWhitt 
    • Christian Jones
    • David Gbenda
    • Kitan Crawford
    • Jerrin Thompson
    • Keilan Robinson
    • Ryan Sanborn

     

    ---------------------------------------------

    Tracking Portal Destinations:

    • DB  Larry Turner-Gooden  San Jose St.
    • DB   Xavion Brice     North Texas
    • DB   BJ Allen Jr.       North Texas
    • DB   Jalen Catalon
    • WR   Casey Cain       UNLV
    • WR   Isaiah Neyor
    • QB    Maalik Murphy    DUKE
    • OL/DL  Sawyer Goram-Welch
    • DL      Kris Ross

     

     

    Why is Gbenda in the likely gone category? 

    • Hook 'Em 1
  3. 4 hours ago, Snake Diggity said:

    Current expected 2024 vs 2023 Out/In Tally:

    QB (-1): Out: Murphy, Wright; In: Owens

    RB (0): Out: Robinson, Brooks; In: Gibson, Clark

    WR (0): Out: Worthy, Mitchell*, Whittington, Cain, Neyor; In: Golden, Wingo, Butler, Livingstone, Dubose

    TE (0): Out: Sanders; In: Washington

    OL (+1): Out: Jones, Gorman-Welch; In: Cruz, Kibble, Baker

    DL (+1): Out: Sweat, Murphy, Carter, Ross; In: Moore, Umeozulu, January, Hills, Robinson

    LB (0): Out: Ford, Bush; In: Simmons, Smith

    DB (-3): Out: catalon, Watts, Thompson, Allen, Crawford, Brice, Turner-Gooden, Barron*; In: Mukuba, Filsaime, Black, JJR, Mack, Wilson

    ST (0): Out: Sanborn; In: Kern

    Are we expecting some departures at OL and maybe one at RB?

  4. On 12/10/2023 at 9:51 AM, RollingPresidential said:

    They've been friends since the Barking Carnival days. Not sure what happened to McClyde (who posts on IT) or Nickel Rover (Jason something, forgot his name). Bitterwhiteguy and Drew Dunlevie (Sailor Ripley) were the other ones I think. 

    I’ve been off of longhorn boards for a while. Is Nahlin jesus shuttlesworth and/or trips left? 

  5. 4 minutes ago, suddenly shaggy said:

    Nope, you're right HG. They use voice recognition software.

    At one point, there was a full transcript. Trump's enablers hid the full transcript in the high level classified server to keep it hidden. It has probably been deleted now, but the upgraded security of the high level classified security will show who accessed and deleted it. 

    This is the version that looked the best for them and there are two sections with ellipses indicating missing material. The Trump administration has lost any benefit of the doubt. Those ellipses probably contain additional relevant material that they cut out before release. 

     

    Has this been reported anywhere?

  6. 16 minutes ago, henrygandorf said:

    i haven't been following this the past week or so, but my understanding is that this is incorrect. 

    there is a voice-recognition system in the sit-room that does its best (with trump, who knows) to produce an actual transcript of every phone call.  then there are people who are assigned to take these calls and make summaries, quote portions, whatever they need to do, and then send those versions around to people who need to know what was said in each call, because not everyone's schedules permit them to always be live, and there are people in the administration, state dept, whatever, that need to stay current.

    it is my understanding that instead of going to the common server, which is accessible to people who are tasked with this, that this particular transcript was almost immediately flagged by white house counsel and moved to a secure server, code-word clearance, that was thought to contain "only matters of national security", and not "anything political or potentially embarrassing".  once the secure server was mentioned, stories started to surface that there were other transcripts moved there illegally, including calls with russia and saudi arabia.

    after some time, there was a "summary" or "memo" version released of this call, which many called a "transcript" but it never actually was.  the version that was released sounds an awful lot like the summary memos that are sent around after a call with a foreign leader, and i believe that's what this was.  i haven't heard from anywhere that this is the version that was once housed in the code-word server, but again, i may not be completely current on this topic.  i don't know who has access to that server, but i seriously doubt they would just pop something out and distribute it the way this one was.

    i also highly doubt the white house is depending solely on note-takers for calls like this.  i can't remember where i heard about the voice-recognition, but i think it was in an interview, not sure if it's written anywhere, but i'm not imagining it.  i would think worst case, there are recordings of calls and stenographers go in afterwards to catch every word.  if you've ever seen actual transcripts of trump talking anywhere to anyone, you could tell that this is not a word-for-word account.  it's not like this call happened, and then poof, there was the summary "transcript" released.  it all happened quickly once the news broke, but the call itself was the day after mueller testified back in july.

    i'd be happy to be proven wrong, however.  is there some article somewhere confirming this is the one and only piece of recollection from that phone call?  that the one we all read was the one once housed in the codeword server?

      

     

    Initially, I thought this was the case. The way it was reported and the online comments here and elsewhere made it seem like there was another transcript that was more accurate and kept in the secure server.

     

    However, over time I believe this account...

    45 minutes ago, sheeeit said:

    A lot to unpack here.  You really do not understand what you are talking about.

    The whistle blower referred to the " official word-for-word transcript of the call that was produced-as is customary-by the White House Situation Room. "  

    The document that was released by the WH was that exact document.  Not a summary of the transcript, the same transcript.  There is no other document.  The one released is the official situation room document.  The exact document that was classified and placed on the secure server.  The exact one the whistle blower was referring to.

    You are clearly trying to imply that there exists another transcript.  There is zero evidence anywhere that another document exists.  Listen carefully- dozens of people listened to the call, including the very same people that told the whistle blower about the call.  You want us to believe that the WH released a doctored or abbreviated or something similar transcript to the public, and told the public it was the official situation room transcript, and that not one of the dozen people who heard the call- again including the ones that informed the whistle blower about how bad it was- have claimed that it was not the whole transcript.  No one who heard the call has questioned this.  No one.  You are just wrong.  (note- you need to tell the other lawyers hammering me on my word choice that the whistle blower is a "lying, fucking liar" for saying that the situation room transcript is word for word)

    As for the ellipses, once again you are just clinging to speculative nonsense.  The former director of the same situation room for Obama said that the ellipses represented times where the person speaking paused in the course of the conversation.  Nothing was omitted.  

    If you could just think, you wouldnt have these problems.  Just ask yourself if you truly believe that the dozen or so people that listened to the call and decided to take it to the IG and file an official report and communicate with the intelligence committee would just stand by and not hammer the WH if the transcript that was released was not the whole thing.  

    ... to be more or less accurate. Is there not any reputable news report that can clarify or reconcile these two versions?

  7. 19 hours ago, Crusher said:

    First FISA warrant was applied for against Carter Page Oct 2016. So 2 years 7 months since the FBI and Justice Dept. officially started a case investigating Trump and Russian influence.

    If they had the goods, Trump would be in handcuffs now. Once you find proof of a mole you stomp on him.

    Can someone remind me when Carter Page joined and left the Trump campaign?

  8. 21 hours ago, Horn Under a Bad Sign said:

    Like those folks in that Qanon thread I, too, have a lowly opinion of law enforcement officers, and have had ever since they caught me with three .lbs of heroin and sent me to prison for 17 years. 

    If it wasn’t for bad luck, you wouldn’t have none at all.  

×
×
  • Create New...