- Popular Post
-
Posts
230 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Jester
-
-
2 minutes ago, tx 3 putt said:
GW Fins is goodHad the blue fin tuna there last night along with the lobster dumplings and ceviche. Did not disappoint.
- 1
- 1
- 2
- 1
-
-
7 minutes ago, Armybrat said:
Does anyone sell a UT polo shirt with the pocket over the left tit?
Check out Criquet shirts. Might have something you like. Burnt Orange Shirt
- 1
-
2 hours ago, horn4life said:
So what is you thoughts on the appraised value of $78M after a $108M sale? I was wondering why you didn't address the most obvious and current valuation, instead focusing only on the faulty on? I think the answer is pretty obvious, because it is so easy to see the property being grossly undervalued. Or are you so silly to asert tht the leaseback provision has a value of roughly $30 million dollars?
I will happily admit the $29 million is inaccurate and incomplete. But why the $30 million difference in a sale price and appraised value? You also assert the benefits of rich commercial property owners to appeal their values. Which is their right, and the fact that Texas specifically allows the shielding of values is specific to keeping the taxable values BELOW the actual values. Nothing more nothing less.
But really Bluto, Explain the $30 million difference in appraised value vs actual value? This should be fun... 😉
tldr: it's not that easy.
I'll take a stab and Bluto can correct or jump in where he wants to. Without knowing the specifics of the purchase, it's hard to 'explain' the discrepancy between the appraised value and purchase price. With commercial properties, there are all sorts of intangibles that are not taxable that are typically included in a purchase. It's why Walgreens pays at least 2x for a property on a corner at a busy intersection. The property isn't worth that much, but it's a Walgreens business decision. Then you have competitors trying to buy up land parcels to keep competitors out and overpaying for the same (see Lowe's and Home Depot acquisitions or even CVS and Walgreens). Those overages are not taxable because the properties are simply not worth that much on the open market. Then you can get into other avenues like 1031 exchanges where companies or individuals simply need to park their money to avoid a tax consequence who simply do not care about overpaying. The list goes on and on. In other words, it's not that simple and we'd need to know specific facts about the purchase to try and understand why TCAD landed on that valuation.
All of that being said, you're focused on the market value and not the equity value. If all other comparable properties indicate a value of $78mm, then it will be on the tax roll for $78mm. To get to 108mm, the District would need to raise the entire asset class by 38% to reflect a $108mm value. But does 1 sale make a market?
-
13 minutes ago, Pancho said:
Just straight up lying! Someone please lunch her in the dick!
Gross.
-
3 hours ago, CTC2 said:
I think the point is that this type of crap is not what Austin needs help with. I’d much rather them be at least busting up all the graffiti than hassling people for traffic violations.
I think their point/goal is utilizing state troopers (and maybe even complicit APD officers) to issue citations that our DA won’t prosecute. They’ll use these stops for arguments/evidence at the legislature to “reign in rogue DA’s” with bullshit bills….which they’re trying to push through.
This isn’t about the tail light. Or the weed. It’s about the politics in my opinion.
And you’re right. We don’t need nor want help with those particular issues.
- 3
- 1
-
TxTwoRickyDr. Drunkenstein...hmmm.
- 1
-
Let’s just keep playing Brooks and make a game of this.
-
Just now, Anastasis said:
Pricing is kinda nuts on that site.
Ya. Here’s another dispensary/outfit in south Austin.
It ain’t the cheapest, but it’s a step for the state. Hopefully once everyone applies and qualifies we’ll be on our way to rec.
In any event, it’s cheaper than a flight to/from XYZ state and you know it’s not black market stuff.
-
10 minutes ago, Patricio Swayze said:
Wait. Are you trying to claim that jumping through hoops to get 600mg is legitimate legal medical cannabis? Is this real fucking life? Give me a fucking break.
Furthermore, I am going to harp again on the bullshit of “legal” weed. Even if my doctor could magically get me medical weed, my employer could terminate me if I pop a drug test even if I have a script. How is that ok???
Yes. It’s legitimate. It’s a fucking 30 minute zoom call if you qualify. If you want to call that “hoops”, so be it. Link for one spot is here along with the app/process. If you qualify, you qualify. Ain’t that complicated.It’s legal if you’re in the CURT system. You got an employer problem, then you got an employer problem. Can’t help ya there and it changes none of the above.
dps link to CURT system:
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Longhorn_Fan68 said:
I get there are workarounds and loopholes and local rules and shit, but it's not statewide policy. it's still illegal officially
It is a statewide policy though. There is a statewide database called CURT. It’s a thing.
If you’re prescribed any sort of pain meds or muscle relaxers, congrats… you qualify.
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Wtf are y’all even talking about? Lose Worthy and being okay with it? Get the fuck outta here with that shit.
- 27
- 2
-
46 minutes ago, Deej said:
I'm not going to be happy until I see Quinn on the sideline between drives, smoking a heater with one hand, and a cold beer in the other.
<the replacements kicker image here>
-
-
-
On 8/17/2022 at 8:24 PM, TheMailBox357 said:
The fact the 9.95ers all got it wrong after this fucking tweet makes it all the more hilarious. Well done Texas football. Well done.
- 4
- 1
-
1 minute ago, Texas Wahoo said:
I very well may be mistaken. I am just going by what I read about the lawsuit and the fact that the interns my company has had from there have suggested that they really play down the previous association with Wesleyan.
Ya. I went there. I know the d bag that filed the suit and had friends on the BOD when it went down. Ags did try to distance themselves, and eventually did, but they also wanted to claim all of the past accomplishments while they transitioned. That’s what it was about.
Just looked at the website. I can remember at least 9 professors that are still there that I had. You’d be surprised how much a large endowment can bump up a school’s ranking without any other changes.
Anywho. Fuck the Aggies and anything associated with them.
- 2
-
7 minutes ago, Texas Wahoo said:
It helps that they did not really take over Texas Wesleyan, they just bought the physical assets and the accreditation and dropped everything else about the school including its history and former students. The former students even sued and A&M because they will not let them say they are A&M law graduates. Starting from scratch in terms of reputation as the only public law school in DFW made the rise much easier.
The reason the got sued was because they were, and still are to my knowledge, using accomplishments from Wesleyan students. Moot court national competition finishes and the like. Lawsuit was still stupid.
And they did take over Wesleyan. Kept almost the entire faculty in place. Many are still there. Not sure where you got that idea.
-
On 7/6/2022 at 8:56 AM, closetojumping said:
This fucking idiot created that dipshitted name and didn’t even check to make sure he could secure the URL. Wow.
Outside of certain tragic hilarity with all of this, I believe the one other benefit this absurdity will provide is that there is one fanbase dumb enough to wind up backing him in some form. With that group’s support, he’s going to get in the middle of a recruitment or two and royally fuck them up for ATM.
Which is precisely why we should back him. Fire up Ol Sarge and give that man a soap box already.
-
14 hours ago, TrashMaster G said:
🤢🤢🤢🤮
*waist
*waist
You did not see what I did their.
-
I'm guessing it's a sneaky little bear market rally. hopefully it's a typical one and lasts a few weeks or longer. going to get everyone all comfortable like to re-invest..... and then steal whatever money they have left.
- 1
- 1
-
On 5/9/2022 at 3:58 PM, JFKFC said:
Other than oversized sunglasses, unnecessary belts and too much eye makeup, what are your type 5 women's fashion faux pas?
High waste jeans. Mom jeans in fashion. I hate this time loop.
- 4
-
I look forward to the bull trap tomorrow morning before another 100pt sell off.
Ukraine War
in Cloak Room
Posted
Well then quit overthinking it…and you’re wrong. Trump tried to pull out of NATO and will most definitely try to halt funding for Ukraine.
in what world is that not Putin’s choice for our president?
This isn’t some enigma wrapped in a riddle.