Jump to content

Ramdiesel

banned
  • Posts

    73
  • Joined

Posts posted by Ramdiesel

  1. 3 hours ago, Longboard Horn said:

    Won't be surprised if we see Heard getting reps against Tulsa next week.

    They should have probably gave Heard a decent shot last season.  I dont have high hopes for any of the QBs.  They cant even teach our starter to lead the running back on a dump pass instead of throwing it behind him.....Sams accuracy is total shit.  I guess Heard couldnt be any worse.

  2. 2 minutes ago, Snacks said:
    5 minutes ago, Gigglebush said:
    Can we have Mack back? Strong and Herman have recruited studs but can't figure out wtf to do with them.

    where? we have no OL, QB, DL, LB, OC

    We got athletes, and they got guys that want to play football.  I would rather have the guys that want to go out and bust ass and play football.  Sick of watching this shitshow of an offense.  No unpredictability, imagination, or explosiveness.  Half our receivers look like mini good year blimps, and the receivers we have that could be making plays like to miss blocks or take plays off...And the QB couldnt hit the broadside of a barn or lead a receiver to save his life even when he is just dumping it off... At least the defense has some bright spots.  

    • Like 2
  3. 25 minutes ago, Cairn Horn88 said:

    aggy hopes so....don't want jimbo jumping to osu.

    Interesting.  Would they be stupid enough to throw the kind of money at Jimbo that aggy did? Or, maybe Jimbo would want out of Aggy land so bad, he would take a pay cut...

  4. On 7/21/2018 at 9:53 AM, SubliminalHorn said:

    Although your insurance talk is completely irrelevant to this conversation, why do you think they didn’t have insurance?

    What’s your point regarding insurance?

    and thank you, poor people do pay a lot of taxes. Maybe not income taxes, but neither do a lot of Americans. Are you equally outraged that many multi billion companies also don’t pay taxes? What about churches?

    That's an awesome argument, a lot of American citizens dont pay income taxes so now we have to let thousands of immigrants into the country that arent going to pay income tax either....Great strategy their; especially, when our economy goes through the next recession and we got thousands more people that werent here before needing help...

    • Like 1
  5. On 7/21/2018 at 11:09 AM, TexArcher said:

    All you Fox News parrots keep saying this, as if it points to acquittal.

    But an investigation that finds nothing ends quickly.  An investigation that finds an awful lot of dots to connect and evidence to connect them takes a long time.

    Example: the Watergate plumbers were arrested in June of 1972.  The investigation started immediately.  Impeachment proceedings against Nixon didn't start until May of 1974.

    And this is much, much bigger than that.

    Also, even if Mueller has Trump dead to rights already, which he may, there wouldn't be much point in releasing his findings now so the current batch of gutless, spineless, self-serving, enabling pussies in Congress could just ignore it all.

    This November the Democrats will take over both chambers, and some time in the following two years your fat man is going down.  But don't worry: Fox News will convince the dumbest 35% of the country, including you, that it was all a witch hunt, that you weren't actually wrong the whole time, and that you're not actually a cancer on the ass of this once-great country. 

    Yeah, these investigations do take an awful long time when there is no evidence to nail Trump and you have to keep digging and digging  and digging and maybe falsify and twist up some information and make threats to Trumps friends so they will make some false testimony against him...

    These investigators are so biased and pissed at Trump at this point, if they had anything at all to nail him it would already be out there....

    Its funny they didnt put half this much effort into investigating the real crimes involving Hillary's email server.

     

    • Fuck You 6
  6. 3 minutes ago, TexArcher said:

    You don't even see the irony, do you?

    Probably unfair of me to expect you to know what "irony" means when you don't know what "fact" means.  Nevermind.  Preach on, O'Reilly.

    Im sure a gang of your  other snowflake buddies will be along shortly on this website and yall can all pound your chests and scrub each others nuts and all that stuff you all like to do on the internet.  Because it makes you feel tough or something.  You wouldnt talk to someone like this in person though because most likely they would thump your ass...

    • Like 3
    • Fuck You 6
  7. 34 minutes ago, TexArcher said:

     

    You've got your Fox News talking points down.  They're all complete bullshit, but you parrot them well.  Good job, I guess.

    You're saying other major news channels did not report Trump asked Nato to increase defense spending or call Germany out on the fuel deal?  It was all over the news.   Here's another little tidbit for you that is further proof Trumps not Putin's puppet -

     

    Quote
    Oil Falls on Prospect of Supply Boost, But Market's `Nervous'
    By Jessica Summers and Erin Douglas
    July 1, 2018, 7:55 PM EDT Updated on July 2, 2018, 4:10 PM EDT

    Crude declined after U.S. President Donald Trump put pressure on Saudi Arabia to ramp up oil output, with traders worrying about how it could affect spare capacity ahead.
    • Like 2
    • Fuck You 2
  8. 57 minutes ago, TexArcher said:

    Yes, there is.  Putin can start talking and get Trump hanged for collusion or imprisoned for money laundering and Trump doesn't want those things to happen.  Vladdy bought himself a good little gimp.

    Except Trump has already been tougher on Russia than anyone since Reagan. So, your theory makes no sense...Was it Vladdy that told him to get Nato to increase defense spending?  Was it Vladdy that told him to go after Germany over their fuel deals with Russia?  I guess Vladdy wants Russia to implode too?...

    Why would Vladdy ever want a student of Reagan as President of the US?  SMH...

    • Like 2
    • Fuck You 9
  9. 2 hours ago, Dahobbs said:

    Again, you are not actually worried about security of this country. So, either you are a russian troll or traitor. Paka. 

    During the Peter  Strzok testimony it was mentioned that almost all of the 30,000 emails on Clinton's server were forwarded to a "foreign-entity" including classified information, and the FBI agents; including Strzok, chose to ignore it when that information was given to them because it would have escalated and changed the scope of the investigation. 

    The people that were/are going after Trump like rabid dogs and investigating him over Russian Collusion did not give a crap that Clinton had a virus on her email server that was forwarding emails with classified information in them to a "foreign-entity."   They apparently didnt give a crap about the security of this country.

    • Fuck You 1
  10. 5 hours ago, Dahobbs said:

    I mean, as far as I know, there hasn't been any evidence that her private server was actually compromised in any way. So, while it was poor practice, it was more so from the perspective of document management than an actual security failure.  Now, the President using an unsecure phone or, you know, just making classified information public, seems, just maybe, to be a more concerning security threat. I'm guessing you don't care about that though. 

    You mean the entire leadership of the Democratic party hope and pray there was nothing taken off that server by the Russians that will come back to bite them in the ass.  There is a reason why Trump is warming up to Putin, and Putin is an astute enough bastard to keep bargaining chips like that in his pocket to use down the road...

    • Fuck You 4
  11. 44 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

    None.

    The answer you're looking for is "none."  As far as I know, even when they were just phone calls, there was someone else in the room or on the line.

    That's kinda the issue, dude.

    It depends on what you define as a private meeting?   You dont think our politicians meet with Russian politicians unofficially outside what we see in the press?  Remember this one?

     

    "A hot microphone picked up President Obama telling Russian President Dmitri Medvedev he would have more flexibility to negotiate on issues like missile defense after the 2012 election"

    • Fuck You 6
  12. 8 minutes ago, Chad Fuck said:

    Or inviting Russian press to the Oval Office and not American...

    or having a private meeting with Putin without anyone else but interpreters in the room...

    or.. oh hell, we could do this all day.  Go read the DT thread.

    Jesus christ!  How many private meetings did other Presidents have with Russian politicians?  Did we get a transcript from those meetings?  NO!...Obama used to hand pick the members of the press he would allow at his pressers.  You know, the ones that would not ask the tough questions, or the ones he was friendly with to make the atmosphere like a big Obama pep rally....

    • Like 1
    • Fuck You 9
  13. 2 hours ago, TornACL said:

    I'm asking the questions here. Keep your mouth shut unless you can answer my question: What should they have done? Remember that your answer should take into account not spoiling any active investigation (Revealing intelligence sources), not causing civil unrest in the nation by giving the indication that the "something" is politically motivated just before the election, etc. etc.

    The facts on what they DID do is clearly available to anybody with two functioning eyeballs. Hell, even one will probably do the trick.

    Well given that it was pretty much known that Russians like to interfere in our elections, not just the 2016 election, and it was also known that politicians like to use there own private servers for email, it seems pretty simple what they could have done.  The powers that be at the IC could have went to said dipshit politicians, or the people that have authority over those politicians and said "hey, Russians and other foreign countries like to hack into shit and get classified information dipshits, maybe its not such a good ideal to have that server sitting in your basement or use it for classified information."   "The American people dont want to have to send there sons and daughters off to World War 3 over your retarded email server getting hacked."

    • Like 1
    • Fuck You 1
  14. 1 hour ago, TornACL said:

    People repeatedly seem to armchair quarterback about what the IC should have done in 2016. The feedback is always that they "did nothing". Which isn't true.

    Regardless, these people never suggest what *should* have been done. Except sometimes they'll say that the IC should have "done something". Which is incredibly enlightening. Something...ah yes, brilliant analysis.

     

     

    If they did something, what was it exactly?  How does Hillary Clinton have an unsecure or at least not very secure private email server if shes the primary candidate for the Democrats?  How does the DNC get hacked?   What was the something they did to prevent Russians from being able to hack those servers and get data off them?

    • Like 1
    • Fuck You 1
  15. 2 hours ago, udaydanceparty said:

    Back on topic...

    I'm curious how anyone can sit here and say our intel community is totally awesome given recent history which includes providing bad intel that lead us to invade Iraq.  The death toll from that fuck up is pretty awful.  Even if you don't get into most recent incidents, it's hard to argue that wasn't a huge knock against the credibility of our intelligence agencies.

    Did everyone completely forget about that or has the decision been made to ignore it?

    You are exactly right...it seems to me there are a bunch of people in our Intel Community trying to save face now because they dropped the ball during the Obama administration.  They knew there was a possibilty Russia could try to interfere with our elections, what did they do about it, though?  They were so convinced Trump would lose, they did nothing.  Now, they are crapping themselves because he was elected and scrambling to try to tie him to the Russians, but telling us they have no political bias.  BULLSHIT!  Who can blame Trump for throwing them under the bus and not trusting their findings?

    • Like 2
  16. On 6/4/2018 at 12:04 PM, lemonlime said:

    Reporters should stop showing up at these thing.  SHS either lies or doesn't answer the question.  They aren't news conferences, but are pure propaganda, at this point.

    Pure propaganda was more of what these press conferences were when Obama was in office.  The mainstream media was/ is so biased to the left they turned these press conferences into a pep rally for Obama and never questioned anything he did at least not to the hysterical levels they question everything about Trump and his administration...

    • Fuck You 18
  17. 8 hours ago, Brisketexan said:

    .....which is why Trump vehemently opposed the sanctions passed by Congress, as well as any suggestion of further sanctions.

    giphy.gif

    Why do we (the US)  need more sanctions against Russia?  That is exactly what makes us look like the sole bad guy.  if Trump can get NATO to finally step up and help by increasing defense spending, and start increasing troop counts as near Russia's borders as possible  like wolves surrounding an elk herd - call it military excercises or drills ...Then start covertly selling arms to his enemies that he is at war with...Get Germany to buy fuel from us or our Allies; instead of, Russia.  Increase the supply of oil so the prices drop.    All this would drive Putin crazy and bring him to the meeting table with a much more flexible attitude.  We have played patty cakes with him for much too long...All he understands is power,  and we need bargaining chips to show him we have it.

    • Like 1
    • Fuck You 2
  18. 5 hours ago, TornACL said:

    I always find it interesting that for the past 35 years, wherever Trump goes he has been followed by a swarm of lawsuits, detractors, and investigations.

    And in all of those cases over the past 35 years, everyone who has ever opposed, sued, investigated or spoken out against Trump has been a liar or is somehow acting outside the rules of ethics and legality. All those people have been liars, bad people, a "disgrace". Words that Trump has been forced to use over and over again over decades.  

    Apparently, Trump has been the only bearer of decency and legality over all those years. And he just has the worst luck of any person ever, because he's just been followed by these hundreds of disgraceful liars who have made these accusations about him, all of which apparently were false or fake. It's incredible really. Almost impossible to believe.

    Some might say Trump has the worst luck of any person in human history.   

    Billionaires attract lawyers and shady people looking to make a buck...

    • Like 2
    • Fuck You 2
  19. 2 hours ago, SuingToGetAMessageBoard? said:

     Where do y’all come up with this stuff? It certainly isn’t trumps words which have been since well before the election that we need to make stronger relationships with Russia. It isn’t trumps actions where he has been cozying up to Russia every day, slow playing in the implementation of sanctions against them despite overwhelming bipartisan support for those sanctions in the Senate,  sending multiple delegations over there,  refusing to act anyway with respect to crimea.  

     

     Is it weird that you have to pretend he is doing the exact opposite of what he is doing, and saying the exact opposite of what he is saying in order to justify your support of the guy? 

    Pretend?  Have you not seen him go after Germany over there natural gas deal with Russia?  Have you not heard in the news that he has asked NATO to increase defense spending by 4%?   It's just the start.  

    He probably does want a better relationship with Russia, but how do you get that with someone like Putin in charge?  You arent going to get it playing footsy under the table with him.  You start taking their economy down and put Putin in a rough spot politically and he will come around...

    • Fuck You 1
  20. Trump has in no way committed treason.  He shook Putin's hand while laughing at him behind his back.  Trumps about to destroy Russia economically.  He's using the Reagan playbook.  He already went after Russia's economic lifeline by embarassing Germany to all the Nato allies over there Natural Gas deal with Russia.  As soon as that gas deal goes away, and the NATO allies start increasing spending on defense, Putin is going to be in a really uncomfortable position.  The next step is for all our allies around the world to increase oil output and drop the price of oil to a level at which Russia cannot afford to produce it.  Straight out of the Reagan playbook to kill Russia's already shaky economy...While doing all of the above, we secretely ship some arms to Russias enemies they are currently at war with and become a real burr in Putin's ass.  

    • Like 1
    • Fuck You 4
×
×
  • Create New...