Jump to content

this

banned
  • Posts

    232
  • Joined

Posts posted by this

  1. 54 minutes ago, Go Pokes said:

    So you're saying our ceiling is 9-3.  I don't think we win this one, but I've got low expectations for this season.  

    I don't know, pokes might surprise one of those teams. Especially if one of the QBs go down. 

  2. Just now, Iconoclast Texan said:

    The Tom Herman road to redemption and hope will be restored to the UT fan base with a big victory on Saturday night. I can’t wait for the haters to be proven wrong. Herman’s track record in big games is excellent. Sam definitely improved in the Tulsa game. Liked his pocket presence. I’m still sticking with my preseason prediction of 9 wins. 

    Herman's teams suffered: 

    L against Maryland 2017

    L against SC 2017

    L against OU 2017

    L against Maryland 2018. 

    What part of this looks excellent to you? 

    • Like 1
  3. Kyler is going to run circles around your defense, score about 50 odd in the first half and then hand over the keys to the backup. 

    Another 18 game or longer losing streak starts for Iowa State, unfortunately for you. 

    • Fuck You 4
  4. Just now, alincoln said:

    The key to the game is TCU's OL vs. OSU's DL.  OSU's DL is deep and loaded with NFL talent but their back-7, while also talented, is vulnerable.   

    There will also be 50,000 Buckeye fans at the game.  

    This will be a home game for the Buckeyes.

  5. 1 hour ago, T’Boo Ted Marshall said:

    Is it?  How often has OU been down in the last 15-20 years?  It's maddening since we should be peers in the college landscape but we aren't.  

    Good question. I looked into it and obviously their last two decades have been pretty successful so I delved a bit deeper.

    They've had 5 sub 50% seasons since 1942. 

    Texas however has had 5 since 1991. 3 in the last ten.

    But what surprised me is this stat: 

    OU has had 34(out of 67) ten or more win seasons since 1950. That's roughly half the fucking time, its ridiculous how successful they've been. So any given year they should more likely expect to have an amazing season and a run for national championship than to have a rebuilding year regardless of the coach. 

    Texas has had 21 ten win seasons since 1950.

  6. 6 minutes ago, Hamttx said:

    Yep, that brain trust running SC isn’t anything special. And both teams have enough talent that someone on either team could step up and make a play or two to win the damn thing. Regardless of the situations that bad coaching put them in.

    Think SC has way more talent however. But the game is at home for Texas so it evens it out...somewhat.

  7. 7 minutes ago, Hooky Hornstein said:

    You have a coach who can't answer a question without hemming and hawing and drinking from a water bottle and he wonders why his team over-analyzes things instead of just reacting quickly.

     Yep.  It's such a mystery.

    These questions make him thirsty.

  8. 30 minutes ago, Katfid54 said:

    I watched the OU/FAU game this morning.  OU's line didn't look particularly good--even against FAU's overmatched (and very young D).  Our issue with them last year was them busting us on long runs (other than that one goddamn Mark Andrews wheel route).  I feel more confident in our ability to do that this year than last year.

    Yeah, if Riley has a month to prepare he can make almost any DC look silly. But week in and out, this might work in favor of teams with a decent to good D line. 

  9. 22 minutes ago, FondrenRoad said:

    If you cant scroll down and work the charts, you're a bigger idiot than I thought. But you already know that the same data set for household income is on the same fucking wiki page right above the adult equivalent table you copied.  Im sure you saw it there. You're certainly a lying piece of shit.  As is Ryan.  How can you sleep at night when you are such a dishonest person?

    You cant just slap an inaccurate label on a data set and pretend it's the same.  It's not. The fact that Ryan references it incorrectly for the entirety of the article while comparing it to other data sets makes him either a massive liar or completely incompetent. More likely, he is both.

    LOL. How do you sleep at night knowing that you are such an idiot? Ignorance? Most likely.

    Coming back to it being 20K, do you realize that we are indeed better off? 

  10. 3 minutes ago, FondrenRoad said:

    The link I posted takes you directly to the OECD's data.  Your copy and paste job is for median equivalent adult income, and not for "median household incomes compared" as Ryan claims.  So I guess he's an outright liar since he just slaps a factually false title on his graph, and you're a passive liar because you intentionally excluded the title from yours.

    No, your link does not take one to the actual data that points to Japan's 30K PPP data. It takes you to a general OECD data page. 

    And you want the equivalent income and PPP to compare apples to apples. Its not Ryan or my fault that you're too dense to understand that. 

  11. 4 minutes ago, FondrenRoad said:

    Once again, the actual published OECD data is ALREADY PPP.  It isn't 20k for Japan.  Its 31,539.

    https://data.oecd.org/hha/household-disposable-income.htm

    "This indicator is measured in terms of net in annual growth rates and in terms of gross adjusted in USD per capita at current prices and PPPs"

    So why don't you read shit before you spout shit. 

    First, your link doesn't even take me there. Secondly, here's another source confirming that number.  

    Rank Country Median income (US$, PPP)[3] Year
    1 23px-Flag_of_Luxembourg.svg.png Luxembourg 38,516 2013
    2 21px-Flag_of_Norway.svg.png Norway 36,043 2013
    3 16px-Flag_of_Switzerland.svg.png  Switzerland 34,608 2013
    4 23px-Flag_of_the_United_States.svg.png United States 34,514 2016
    5 23px-Flag_of_Australia.svg.png Australia 31,340 2014
    6 23px-Flag_of_Canada.svg.png Canada 29,521 2013
    7 23px-Flag_of_Austria.svg.png Austria 29,278 2013
    8 21px-Flag_of_Iceland.svg.png Iceland 27,919 2013
    9 20px-Flag_of_Denmark.svg.png Denmark 27,157 2013
    10 23px-Flag_of_Belgium_%28civil%29.svg.png Belgium 26,922 2013
    11 23px-Flag_of_the_Netherlands.svg.png Netherlands 26,820 2014
    12 23px-Flag_of_Sweden.svg.png Sweden 26,627 2013
    13 23px-Flag_of_Finland.svg.png Finland 25,810 2014
    14 23px-Flag_of_Germany.svg.png Germany 25,140 2013
    15 23px-Flag_of_France.svg.png France 24,547 2013
    16 23px-Flag_of_New_Zealand.svg.png New Zealand 23,304 2012
    17 23px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom.svg.png United Kingdom 22,546 2016
    18 23px-Flag_of_Ireland.svg.png Ireland 22,200 2013
    19 23px-Flag_of_South_Korea.svg.png South Korea 22,176 2014
    20 23px-Flag_of_Japan.svg.png Japan 21,675 2013
    21 23px-Flag_of_Italy.svg.png Italy 20,860 2013
    22 23px-Flag_of_Spain.svg.png Spain 20,600 2015
    23 21px-Flag_of_Israel.svg.png Israel 17,802 2014
    24 23px-Flag_of_Slovenia.svg.png Slovenia 16,224 2013
    25 23px-Flag_of_the_Czech_Republic.svg.png Czech Republic 15,391 2013
    26 23px-Flag_of_Slovakia.svg.png Slovakia 14,171 2013
    27 23px-Flag_of_Portugal.svg.png Portugal 14,053 2013
    28 23px-Flag_of_Romania.svg.png Romania 13,966 2013
    29 23px-Flag_of_Estonia.svg.png Estonia 13,719 2013
    30 23px-Flag_of_Poland.svg.png Poland 13,630 2013

     

    Source: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=IDD

    Note, its the same one as quoted in the article. 

    Read shit dumbass, talk less and post even less than that. 

×
×
  • Create New...