-
Posts
3,982 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by NAVY
-
-
13 hours ago, DigglerontheHoof said:
This is concerning to me. He should have been booed off the stage at an event like this but it was mixed. Probably more boos than cheers but not overwhelming either way.
It’s a fucking shoe convention. I didn’t even know something so uninteresting existed. The reaction of the weirdos that paid to be there don’t mean shit
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
-
-
I remember skating to this at the roller rink. …Russia’s greatest love machine
- 1
-
-
-
We’re not this lucky but man wouldn’t it be something if Tuckems fell out of a window on his big adventure?
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, Gatorubet said:Whatever keeps his blood pressure elevated is fine with me.
Huh. I’d like to see it drop to zero
- 6
- 6
- 7
-
-
Eat dicks KC !
- 3
-
Yeassss! Go Niners D!
-
I like points
-
Fuck yeah! Go Niners
-
-
Let’s go Niners!
-
Rainey St. killer is murdering cars now
-
Whatever happens, OU will suck
- 2
- 1
-
15 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:
Goddamn, Turley is beclowning himself.
The DC Circuit local rules are more generous on timing of rehearing than the Federal Rules, but all of them are caveated "unless the court shortens or lengthens the time."
Under Fed. R. App. P., you have 14 days to seek rehearing/en banc in a criminal case (Turley read the civil rule). DC gives you 30 in all cases (he didn't read these at all). But in this one, DC gave him a week to seek relief from SCOTUS. Which indicates they aren't staying the mandate if he fucks around with rehearing,
Also, a super-curious thing. This opinion is "per curiam." That means literally "for the court," meaning the opinion is not that of a single judge, or two of the three, or unanimous, but instead reflective of the judgment of the entire court.
Usually, that's reserved for very short and non-controversial opinions (at least notwithstanding the controversy between the parties). Usually, if you lose an appeal on a per curiam opinion, that's a pretty humiliating defeat: your arguments were just barely worthy of consideration.
It's kind of a judicial "duh," meaning any panel of judges from the circuit would have decided it the same way. Pretty unusual for a 57 page opinion of such importance. It might reflect that the panel judges sought concurrence of all of the judges, possibly in order to deter a petition for rehearing en banc.
Appreciate the detailed law-splaining homie
-
5 minutes ago, Foosters said:
I still think Antifa/Illegal Immigrant insurance was the way to go. Could've singlehandedly wiped out the Boomer's nest eggs.
For just $3.99 a month, you can rest easy knowing that if an antifa or illegal damages you or your property, you will be covered.
Is that like a Patriot Protection Plan (PPP)?
-
Build wall! No, wait…
-
Losers should be Aztec sacrificed. Also that pro bowl sideline Michele Buck gal is hawt
- 1
-
-
25 minutes ago, Pato del Muerto said:
Spoiler function does exist, and for posts like the above.
How dare you try to minimize the Trump first amendment rights!
Also, what specifically do you want censored? The tiny hands or manly vulva?
45 indicated
in Cloak Room
Posted
Go on …