Jump to content

westexhorn

Full Members
  • Posts

    1700
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by westexhorn

  1. 7 hours ago, Slacks said:

    OkSo... I don't have LHN and I was out with some UT brothers and wives, so I did not see the game. I will, but for now I want an overview from those of you who can see what's good and what needs work.

    It seems like the game was so out of hand that there wasn't much work, which I don't like, but I'm ok with saving dudes and playbook to get ready for next week.

    So, what looked good and what didn't?

     

    Ewers needs to work on that deep ball to Worthy.  

    Ewers connection to JT Sanders was popping off

    Our punter can't catch and got benched

    • Hook 'Em 1
  2. 19 minutes ago, Bevo said:

    Talent trumps all. If you put together NIL deals we will be fine. I wasn’t thrilled with the Sark hire but I think he put together a very strong staff and he addressed a plethora of our issues as a team. He has things moving in the right direction. 
     

    We sucked last year, but I don’t think Sark is a potato. He can at least run an offense. Let’s look at it another way. What makes Sarkisian average? Is he disorganized or lazy? Does he not know how to bring in a good staff on defense? Is he a worse Xs and Os guy than Mack Brown? Where does he need to get better?

    Does he know how to foster a culture of toughness in his players?

    Can he make adjustments in the 2nd half?

  3. 16 minutes ago, closetojumping said:

    I am not one of the top 75 donors to the AD, so, shockingly, I was not invited. What I can pass on, if I hear anything credible, will happen over time, I'm sure. 

    I wonder what it would actually take to slot into the top 75 donor number, though. I think something akin to $100k/year probably is around the cutoff. Maybe it's $500k. Doubt it's higher than that. Might also just be the total someone has historically given, I don't know. 

    sounds like we need to ask the sugar babies then

×
×
  • Create New...