-
Posts
1025 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Humble Beast
-
-
18 minutes ago, CoTex said:
Can we start up a surly crypto? Seems easy. We just make up a name, and start cranking it out.
Some press releases about how its the next greatest thing - better than the last one.
When some idiots come along and want in - we jack the price and trickle some volume out.
Then, when we get some real action, we dump and use the cash to buy a condo in the bahamas and pay some football players.
Did I miss a step?
I propose we call it "Gig em coin." I've got an idea about where we might find customers.
Looch would work for Gigem Coin.
I hate to break it to you, but Austin/UT has wayyyy more crypto going on than aggy.
-
20 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:
I assume you mean other than yourself as the originator?
Oh it was in the tweet I shared. I’ve said the whole time this would be a both sides issue if politicians are involved.
21 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:Yes. I wouldn't say creditors names are commonly redacted, but it does happen, particularly when the creditors involved are individuals as opposed to business entities. You have to remember, the purpose of creating a list of creditors is so that they can be notified of the bankruptcy and submit claims. It isn't to alert the public of the names of the creditors and investors in a bankrupt entity. There is actually a motion on file regarding the need for redaction (https://cases.ra.kroll.com/FTX/Home-DownloadPDF?id1=MjMxNDQ0Ng==&id2=-1). I think redaction here is warranted.
Thanks for clarifying.
-
9 hours ago, Dahobbs said:
Online, yes. That's what happens when a nation state devotes its budget to creating chaos. It isn't even a secret anymore. They openly admit to doing it. No idea why you continue to deny it. None of this changes the fact that FTX has fuck all to do with the Clintons.
Also, redacted filings aren't unusual at all.
9 minutes ago, Dahobbs said:No, his thought is, "I can't believe they're not more critical of people whose influence he tried to buy." We don't buy into the whole FTX is really just another front for the Clinton campaign of evil, therefore we aren't taking a critical look at bad dem behavior.
I scrolled up and checked. You’re the only person that keeps bringing up the Clinton’s. Stop.
Are you an attorney? I’m surprised that creditors names would commonly be redacted in these filings. Why is that common? -
2 hours ago, Captainant said:
Mfw zerohedge has formally accused of being a Russian disinformation source by the US government
Keep on reading your """fair and biased""" sources lmfao
40 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:It was clear that zerohedge wasn't operating in good faith at least 15 years ago, but plenty of shaggy/surly "icons" were fully bought in.
Further evidence that certain political bents are fully convinced their ilk are a whole lot smarter than they really are. And so it goes.
I understand the reticence around Zerohedge posts. I don’t share any of their longer form commentary. These are bankruptcy filings. No editorializing needed.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/11/20/ftx-crypto-bankruptcy-creditors/
From WaPo if it makes you feel better.
“Its top 50 creditors are owed a total of $3.1 billion, the filing showed, with the largest due $226 million.
The names of the creditors were redacted.”
So what the ZH post said.
We have a shit ton of lawyers here. Any involved with bankruptcy/restructuring? How common is it to redact the names of creditors?
-
1 hour ago, Dahobbs said:
Lol. Sure Sergei.
Fwiw I think if politicians are implicated in the FTX scandal, both sides will be involved like with Epstein.
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
- 2
- 1
- 15
- 3
-
-
On 11/18/2022 at 1:24 PM, YGIFS said:
Are we not offering up enough thoughts and prayers? Is that this shit is going sideways still? Sorry y'all, I've been slipping on my T&P regiment.
This has to be just beyond maddening for the families there right now. To see people that didn't give fuck one about them in the first place, exploit them for gain, and then move on as if nothing had happened.
It’s a strange vibe there. “Like living in a cemetery”.
Also a sad irony is there’s a couple empty cop cars left out in front of the school to deter people with morbid curiosity from hanging around.
- 1
-
-
This will be another big shoe to drop. DCg/Grayscale administers the gbtc trust. Not sure how bankruptcy proceeding for DCG would affect gbtc.
-
45 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:
I took the time to click through the Teslarati article and there’s a link to an underlying legal case. While the article says Twitter “refused to take down content even after the exploited individuals begged them to,” it neglected to mention that Twitter did an initial review, first found no violation, then removed the material after law enforcement contacted them and verified it was exploitative.
Shocker, that kind of important context being left out of “Teslarati” blog.
Well ackshually they did review it but thought it was fine. Then the cops had to make it them take it down. It’s not the own you think it is.
Thanks for the “context”.
- 3
-
29 minutes ago, 956 Worldwide said:
I took the time to click through the Teslarati article and there’s a link to an underlying legal case. While the article says Twitter “refused to take down content even after the exploited individuals begged them to,” it neglected to mention that Twitter did an initial review, first found no violation, then removed the material after law enforcement contacted them and verified it was exploitative.
Shocker, that kind of important context being left out of “Teslarati” blog.
Im going to go out on a limb and say cleaning up the hashtags is good thing.
Interesting that Twitter did a review of complaints related to child exploitation and tightly adhered to ToS until law enforcement had to intervene. But “deadnaming” people got you the axe immediately. Priorities were totally jacked.
- 7
-
On 11/18/2022 at 9:47 AM, DefinitelyNotHollywoodColt said:
What do you agree with Elon about in terms of his management of Twitter?
What about his first few weeks at the helm have you cheering wildly?
Its been an unmitigated disaster in every conceivable way.
This is good. It was a weird area where Twitter was negligent in moderation.
- 1
- 2
-
-
-
-
He was always allowing Trump back on. Did anyone really think otherwise? How poorly Trump behaves will determine how long he’s back.
- 3
-
5 minutes ago, maninblack said:
It's Epstein all over again
It’s suspect.
- 1
- 4
-
17 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:
So let’s see. Trump used Twitter to coordinate a deadly assault on the US Capital in a desperate attempt to pull a coup. Now Trump is about to be indicted. Anyone that dies in the coming violence- Elon will have their blood on his hands.
- 11
-
-
On 11/18/2022 at 11:31 AM, maninblack said:
I'm still skeptical that we get to see the whole picture but fingers crossed
So they’re hiding something. Either other businesses in crypto circles that are in distress, or who utilized their exchange for money laundering.
- 1
- 2
-
-
Bitcoin and other crypto-The CR thread
in Cloak Room
Posted · Edited by Humble Beast
What a fucking fox.
Here I agree with you. Effective altruism has weird communist vibe. It’s all for the greater good.