Jump to content

Doc Reeves

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    6650
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Doc Reeves

  1. 9 minutes ago, T’Boo Ted Marshall said:

    If Stoops and Mixon can overcome video proof of a female beatdown, Urbs will skate.  It's just they way these things go.  

     

    Absolutely this. 

     

    After multipule OU fiascos and the Baylor horror show I doubt the dickless NCAA will do shit. The way they treat this shit is practically the text book definition of misogyny

  2.  

    Tang seems like he’s a great guy, but there’s no chance this guy fucks.

     

    https://www.quantamagazine.org/teenager-finds-classical-alternative-to-quantum-recommendation-algorithm-20180731/

     

    A teenager from Texas has taken quantum computing down a notch. In a paper posted online earlier this month, 18-year-old Ewin Tang proved that ordinary computers can solve an important computing problem with performance potentially comparable to that of a quantum computer.

    In its most practical form, the “recommendation problem” relates to how services like Amazon and Netflix determine which products you might like to try. Computer scientists had considered it to be one of the best examples of a problem that’s exponentially faster to solve on quantum computers — making it an important validation of the power of these futuristic machines. Now Tang has stripped that validation away.

    “This was one of the most definitive examples of a quantum speedup, and it’s no longer there,” said Tang, who graduated from the University of Texas, Austin, in spring and will begin a Ph.D. at the University of Washington in the fall.

    In 2014, at age 14 and after skipping the fourth through sixth grades, Tang enrolled at UT Austin and majored in mathematics and computer science. In the spring of 2017 Tang took a class on quantum information taught by Scott Aaronson, a prominent researcher in quantum computing. Aaronson recognized Tang as an unusually talented student and offered himself as adviser on an independent research project. Aaronson gave Tang a handful of problems to choose from, including the recommendation problem. Tang chose it somewhat reluctantly.

    “I was hesitant because it seemed like a hard problem when I looked at it, but it was the easiest of the problems he gave me,” Tang said.

    The recommendation problem is designed to give a recommendation for products that users will like. Consider the case of Netflix. It knows what films you’ve watched. It knows what all of its other millions of users have watched. Given this information, what are you likely to want to watch next?

    You can think of this data as being arranged in a giant grid, or matrix, with movies listed across the top, users listed down the side, and values at points in the grid quantifying whether, or to what extent, each user likes each film. A good algorithm would generate recommendations by quickly and accurately recognizing similarities between movies and users and filling in the blanks in the matrix.

    In 2016 the computer scientists Iordanis Kerenidis and Anupam Prakash published a quantum algorithm that solved the recommendation problem exponentially faster than any known classical algorithm. They achieved this quantum speedup in part by simplifying the problem: Instead of filling out the entire matrix and identifying the single best product to recommend, they developed a way of sorting users into a small number of categories — do they like blockbusters or indie films? — and sampling the existing data in order to generate a recommendation that was simply good enough.

    At the time of Kerenidis and Prakash’s work, there were only a few examples of problems that quantum computers seemed to be able to solve exponentially faster than classical computers. Most of those examples were specialized — they were narrow problems designed to play to the strengths of quantum computers (these include the “forrelation” problem Quanta covered earlier this year). Kerenidis and Prakash’s result was exciting because it provided a real-world problem people cared about where quantum computers outperformed classical ones.

    “To my sense it was one of the first examples in machine learning and big data where we showed quantum computers can do something that we still don’t know how to do classically,” said Kerenidis, a computer scientist at the Research Institute on the Foundations of Computer Science in Paris.

    Kerenidis and Prakash proved that a quantum computer could solve the recommendation problem exponentially faster than any known algorithm, but they didn’t prove that a fast classical algorithm couldn’t exist. So when Aaronson began working with Tang in 2017, that was the question he posed — prove there is no fast classical recommendation algorithm, and thereby confirm Kerenidis and Prakash’s quantum speedup is real.

    “That seemed to me like an important ‘t’ to cross to complete this story,” said Aaronson, who believed at the time that no fast classical algorithm existed.

    Tang set to work in the fall of 2017, intending for the recommendation problem to serve as a senior thesis. For several months Tang struggled to prove that a fast classical algorithm was impossible. As time went on, Tang started to think that maybe such an algorithm was possible after all.

    “I started believing there is a fast classical algorithm, but I couldn’t really prove it to myself because Scott seemed to think there wasn’t one, and he was the authority,” Tang said.

    Finally, with the senior thesis deadline bearing down, Tang wrote to Aaronson and admitted a growing suspicion: “Tang wrote to me saying, actually, ‘I think there is a fast classical algorithm,’” Aaronson said.

    Throughout the spring Tang wrote up the results and worked with Aaronson to clarify some steps in the proof. The fast classical algorithm Tang found was directly inspired by the fast quantum algorithm Kerenidis and Prakash had found two years earlier. Tang showed that the kind of quantum sampling techniques they used in their algorithm could be replicated in a classical setting. Like Kerenidis and Prakash’s algorithm, Tang’s algorithm ran in polylogarithmic time — meaning the computational time scaled with the logarithm of characteristics like the number of users and products in the data set — and was exponentially faster than any previously known classical algorithm.

    Once Tang had completed the algorithm, Aaronson wanted to be sure it was correct before releasing it publicly. “I was still nervous that once Tang put the paper online, if it’s wrong, the first big paper of [Tang’s] career would go splat,” Aaronson said.

     
  3. 1996- Atlanta Olympic Games Bombing 

    1981- Adam Walsh is kidnapped from a mall. 

    1866- first permanent trans-Atlantic telegraph wire laid.

    1890- Vincent Van Gogh shoots himself. He dies 2 days later

    1929- Geneva Convention is signed by 53 nations.

    1940-  A Wild Hare is released introducing the world to bugs bunny.

    1953- Fighting in the Korean War ceases

    2002- Ukraine Airshow Disaster, worst ever with 85 dead

     

     

    its also Yahoo Serious and Alex Rodriguez’s Birthday today

     

    • Like 1
  4. Just now, DaysOff said:

    Having served I have zero faith in the jury of your peers shit. Tossup the skates because morons.

    A really, really good attorney told me once that if you are ever on a murder jury, it means both sides think you are a Forrest Gump caliber moron.

  5. Joined late 90s and would cruse it at the public terminals at the PCL. It was sometimes The only thing that would keep me from skipping my 2nd class on m/w/f.

     

    got banned when I posted that I didn’t think GG looked like a good College QB on the corresponding circle jerk commit celebration page.  Never went back. Started lurking on Shaggy in early ‘08.

  6. 5 minutes ago, TreatyOak said:

    "I’d really appreciate it if anyone on the current staff at the University of Texas Football team besides Craig Naivar , Jason Washington or Kyle Coats would keep my name out of there mouth and continue to bad talk me or any other junior that decided to leave early."

     

    If Deshon Elliott had used Grammarly:

    I would really appreciate it if the staff of the University of Texas football team, aside from Craig Naivar, Jason Washington or Kyle Coats, would not speak ill about me moving forward. Additionally, I would like this request to extend to the other UT student athletes who left before their senior year for the NFL. Thank you for your consideration.    

    Daymn. That’s the full version. 

    We truly are the Stanford of the Souf...

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...