Jump to content

JBJ

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    4869
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

3999 Surly 10%

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Texas is OSU's best win, and it's really not close.
  2. Paul knows his stuff, but he always has a narrative he's trying to push. Ian has playbook knowledge, but I don't think he can translate it to the field very well. It's always nice to have a former player especially a recent one.
  3. To improve SOS. To give fans another good game during the season. Honestly, if you think you are more likely to lose them than win them, you shouldn't be scheduling them.
  4. Ever watched a game with that one woman referee?
  5. This is not the selection committee.
  6. It's actually both, which is why this discussion is nauseating.
  7. We had an 82% postgame win expectancy vs tOSU and 69% vs Florida. Shit happens. No one actually cares which team played better, it's about getting points on the board.
  8. The aggression is fine, but he needs to change his path. He's gotta be able to peel (and contain outside but he can outmanuever most QBs).
  9. I don't think h2h should be over-emphasized. It's usually misleading because the close team with the h2h win typically lost to a worse team. It's in the same league as cherry-picking transitive property. To settle ties, sure, but I don't think this is a tie.
  10. Overranked: 5 Texas Tech - abysmal SoS. It's seriously G5 tier. I just don't see how anyone could possibly rank them above Oregon. They could probably fall 3-4 spots with no complaints. 8 Oklahoma - feels like the committee just swapped them and Bama due to h2h. But the truth is that Bama has a top 10 SOS and I don't think h2h overcomes that. I'd swap them back. 13 Utah - poor SOS with two losses to boot 18 Virginia - not sure what the committee is even doing here. My poll predictor has them at 28. There's no redeeming stats or qualities that might make them a hidden gem. 21-25 Feels like the committee gives up once they reach this point. Tulane is somewhat justifiable as they have a tough schedule for a G5 (it's tougher than Tech's and comparable to Utah). I don't understand leaving off Washington, Mizzou, Iowa, Illinois, LSU for these teams except they want to avoid a B1G/SEC bias but the reality is what it is this year. I'd have North Texas over Tulane for now, but I suppose that'll work itself out. Finally, 1 Ohio State - I completely understand why they are here, but no one is pointing these things out, so I feel I must. This must be the easiest P2 schedule and if it weren't for Tech, it'd arguably be the easiest P4 schedule. How they managed to do this in the B1G with Texas non-conf is wild. Replace Texas with a rust belt directional school and it's actually worse then Tech's schedule. I haven't seen this mentioned anywhere despite people complaining about Indiana and aggy getting an easy ride.
  11. Taafe should be green dog. McDonald is spy. ---- The other one is cover 3 and CB should have seen the TE release.
  12. To win the playoffs, we need to beat 3 playoff teams....which we likely will already have done if we make it. It's crazy talk to think we won't compete.
  13. Is the color on my TV broken?
  14. All 22 doesn't come in 4k. Trust me that the WR is about catch the ball in the top left and that's Arch on the far right.
×
×
  • Create New...