Jump to content

Pato del Muerto

Certifiably Surly
  • Posts

    51009
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by Pato del Muerto

  1. 19 minutes ago, Enchubben said:

    Honestly it’s so damn all over the place and still evolving, so I’m not sure what the hell it means anymore.  In the context of my statements I consider a DEI hire to be someone who was given a job/promotion etc. solely, or in part because of an alignment with an underrepresented class (gender, color, orientation etc) at the expense of a more qualified candidate based on the job profile. 

    Very wrong and/or misinformed. What you describe isn’t equitable, which is the E in the acronym.   See below for the correct answer. 

    14 minutes ago, troph said:

    I’ve been involved with a lot of DEI hiring processes and the best candidate at the end gets the job. I’ve seen it be white men, white women, people of color. The only thing that changes in a proper DEI process is at the outset, at the beginning, you make sure a diverse group is your starting sample set. The reality is though, there are more mediocre white men promoted in this country than there are excellent people of color, trans people, etc. DEI done correctly is exactly what we need in every organization and institution to ensure the best qualified candidate is chosen. 

    It is making sure you have a diverse candidate pool because that leads to better candidates which leads to better hires. It is the opposite of deciding that black women lack the brainpower for a job so don’t consider them. 

  2. 1 hour ago, Hermanator said:

    They are finding out. 

    They expected trump to give them handouts like last time, expected trump to give them access to lower cost, almost slave labor. Their greed and callous indifference to human life led them to ruin. 

    There's no reason to bail them out again, they are useless to trump. They will be ruined and trump's billionaire buddies will toss them aside and it'll be all corporate industrial farming.

    And suddenly those will be too big to fail and be able to count on bailouts when they cry. 

  3. 8 minutes ago, Pig Bellmont said:

    Why must we track who is “honoring” an unrepentant cunt who also had a podcast?

    My theory: Because he and Turning Point USA funded J6 and Trump told the world his death was a tragedy. Just like Ashli Babbitt. The NFL and others are simply bowing to the whims of the king. 
     

    Trump is only going to leave office in a coffin. He won’t abdicate 

    The nfl has some sort of monopoly exception doesn’t it? And Trump already hates nfl ownership for not letting him buy in and be one of them. 

    • Hook 'Em 3
  4. 31 minutes ago, Brisketexan said:

    Gawdalmighty.  Can you imagine if a perfect Surlyite ever pulled such a stunt?  The FBI would be scratching their heads over cryptic "NowThis," "muledick," "tree fiddy," and "PM Derka" references for years.  When in reality, the shooter's motivation was that Arch's shittacular performances just pushed the shooter over the edge.

    The reaction of most want to see would be that of @immamac

  5. 7 minutes ago, Cousin Strawberry said:

    Thank you to whoever posted the YouTube video of the guy explaining that the type of body armor Kirk was wearing is likely the reason the bullet fragmented, ricocheted and killed him.  He has the footage slowed down to the point you can see the bullet hit him at the top of his BA on the bevel, ricochet, enter his throat and exit left side of his neck. I don't know shit about body armor and assumed it was still all kevlar.  Had no idea that there was BA made from titanium with such a low profile it isn't really visible under a t-shirt. Horrible fucking luck. 

    Did he always wear body armor to gigs?  Or can I pop over to the r conspiracy page and gin up a stunt gone wrong angle?

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Haha 3
  6. 2 minutes ago, Thetexashammer said:

    Agree. The remnants of the MSM are thoroughly engaged in lying to their readers, mostly by omission buy also by commission. Reference the three years long Russia Hoax which, once that expired, they went with years of COVID lies. You'd have to be low IQ to expect them to tell you the truth.

    Lol this pretty well demonstrates the two realities when following my previous post. 

    • Hook 'Em 2
  7. 2 minutes ago, hornbri said:

    The New York Times went with it. I think they are kinda in the middle of right and left wing, certainly not on the extreme of either end. 

    They’re all shopping for clicks now, it’s the only business model. And they are also all either scared of the Trump admin or are owned by a right wing friendly oligarch.   There are now guidelines over what major media outlets can post.  It’s how you know the fascism is working. 

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...