Jump to content

HookEm

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    2460
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by HookEm

  1. I think the correct answer is Kansas.  They are the flagship school in their state.  They are one of the 2-3 biggest names in CBB.  There is a power vacuum in the Big 12 that they could fill if they had a competitive football team. 

    But they don't really care about football at all and probably never will. 

  2. I think it will be interesting to see which schools make a leap in the the coming years.  It wouldn't surprise me to see UCF become relevant.  Their program has only been around ~40 years and the university has grown rapidly in recent years.  Back in 2000, they only had around ~30,000 students.  Today they have 71,000 and are the largest school in the country.  That is a lot of eyeballs.  When they start collecting Big 12 money and play more national games, it will be fun to see if they take advantage of the opportunity. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
  3. 4 hours ago, Al_4_ISU said:


    I think the SEC would take NC State over Miami. It’s an invested fanbase in a new, growing market. Miami becomes kind of pointless with FSU in the fold

    That's fine.  The Big 12 would fall all over themselves to take Miami if the SEC and Big 10 passed on them.  Miami would be the highest profile team in the conference and could be a nice partner for Virginia Tech and UCF.  

    Miami is also a sneaky good basketball program (1 FF, 2 E8, 4 S16 since 2013) which matters to the Big 12. And they are a smaller private school that would fit in with some of the other private schools in the Big 12. 

    It baffles me that anyone would take NC State over Miami honestly.  Miami is better at just about everything that matters including academics.   A lot more people would tune in to see Texas Tech vs. Miami than TT vs. NC State.  And the icing on the cake is that you can recruit South Florida, probably the most dense area for NFL caliber talent in the whole country.

    • Hook 'Em 1
  4. As long as there are crappy teams like Northwestern and Vanderbilt in the Big 10 and SEC, then there should be at least another conference (Big 12) full of the remaining teams that are better than them.

    With 16 teams, a conference can still feel like a conference. Not sure at 18 or 20. 24 teams is ridiculous.

    With 12 playoff spots it will sort itself out. The better conferences will get more teams in than the weak conferences, but they still matter. Even if they only get a team or two in.

    The best cast for me is to get to 3 conferences of 20 and stop there. In a typical playoff, the Big might get 4-5 teams, the SEC 4-5 teams, the Big 12 2-3 and maybe 0-1 comes from the rest.

    So to get there the following adds make sense:
    Big 10 - Notre Dame and UNC
    SEC - FSU, Miami, Clemson, UVA
    Big 12 - VT, Pitt, Louisville, Duke

    Best homeless: NC State, Georgia Tech, Stanford, WSU, Oregon St, Syracuse, UConn, Villanova, SD State

  5. The Big 12 would be dumb to add Stanford and Cal.  They are difficult to deal with and bring very little to the party besides academics.  They are terrible cultural fits and would make everything more difficult.

    At this point the Big 12 should be waiting to see what happens with the ACC, prepared to scoop up any great assets that don't get invited to the Big 10 or SEC.  Why add Cal or Stanford when you could potentially add UNC, Virginia Tech, Miami and Pitt down the road?  Or Virginia. Or Duke. Or Louisville. Or possibly even FSU or Clemson if they get lucky. 

    • Hook 'Em 2
  6. 1 minute ago, Zhorn96 said:

    And full disclosure, I'm a Texas grad but come from a Cal family and grew up in the Bay Area going to Cal games.

    Your family should start coming to grips with the fact that they are going to be in the Mountain West.

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Haha 1
  7. 3 minutes ago, Zhorn96 said:

      But if the Big18 can pick up Cal and Furd for $20M a year (which they would jump at)? 

    Why would the Big 10 want Stanford and Cal when they could add Duke and UNC... who are almost equivalent academic institutions, but offer vastly better athletics and eyeballs.

    Regardless, the Big 10 won't add two more schools.  We may be stopping at 20 and they are going to leave open a spot for Notre Dame guaranteed.

  8. With 20 teams, you can divide into 5-team pods that preserve a lot of the regional rivalries.  Teams can play every team in their pod, plus one team in the other pods for a total of 7 games.  If they expand to 10 conference games, they can also have a permanent rival in each of the other pods that they play every year. 

  9. I think the conferences will continue to expand.  I see the SEC and Big 10 eventually expanding to 20 teams and stopping there. That is going to continue to create instability.  And where will the expansion come from?  NOT the Big 12.  And probably not from the dross of the PAC-10.  The remaining west coast assets are garbage.  So that leaves the ACC.  And as good as the academics are at Cal and Stanford, there are also extremely good academic universities in the ACC that also are decent on the field / court.

    It is a game of chicken.  No school will want to be where Oregon State and Cal are right now. So if a few ACC teams decide to move - or there are even RUMORS that they will move, the 2nd tier teams will immediately start scrambling, just like ASU, Utah, Colorado, etc.  Boom, it will be easy to get the 6 signatures needed.

    If we assume the SEC and Big10 will get to 20, then I see it playing out like this:

    SEC

    • Florida State - This will be the first domino in the next phase IMO
    • Clemson - Best asset available outside of ND and FSU
    • Virginia Tech (or Virginia) - Virginia is the better all around get IMO, but I think they are a better fit in the Big 10.  
    • Miami - Best brand available. Keeps the Big 10 (and largely the Big 12) out of Florida

    Big 10

    • Notre Dame - Obvious destination
    • Virginia - Flagship school with solid athletics and great academics

    Big 12

    • North Carolina - Basketball school who will fit right in to the Big 12 and will take advantage of a Big 12 hoops contract
    • Duke - Part of the deal with UNC.  Also private schools that could do well in the Big 12
    • Louisville - Another great school to add to the hoops contract. Can be decent at football
    • Pitt - Last, best available piece. Natural partner for WV.   (Better add than NC State or Georgia Tech)

    Then you wind up with the following footprints:

    image.thumb.png.3c924b6f85c11f794f3897cb86941d3f.png

    image.thumb.png.57809f1c87e057953b3bd70b15286a2d.png

    image.thumb.png.ec9d5b58176acb654374a4503433861b.png

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Haha 1
    • Drool 1
  10. LMAO.  It’s Friday night so I excuse the crack pipe.  
    ND to the big 12

    Fair.

    What if the Big 12 also added Pitt, Miami and FSU? ND has had good rivalries with all those schools.

    And they would be free to play Michigan and USC out of conference instead of having to meet them in conference (or even risk not playing them due to conference scheduling difficulty).

    (Puts the crack pipe down)
    • Drool 1
  11. I don’t see why the Big 12 doesn’t push to get to 20 and stop there. I think I’m the end we wind up with three 20 team conferences and everybody else.

    The Big 12 could make a strong case to Notre Dame that they are the only conference who respects religious institutions. I think this matters more than many realize. Baylor, BYU and TCU would all help make the case.

    Plus if ND goes to the Big 10 or SEC, they will always be wrestling for power with the old guard. The Big 12 has a power vacuum that Notre Dame could immediately step in and fill. And the ACC will not survive once a few of the big names start getting poached.

    If the Big 12 could get Notre Dame, then FSU and Clemson also become realistic. Round it out with North Carolina or Virginia Tech or Miami and then be done.

    Things are going to get crazy once the ACC fire sale starts.

    • Hook 'Em 1
  12. I'm not saying Dwyane Wade is better than Kobe. Kobe obviously had a better career. I'm just saying I would probably rather PLAY with prime Wade.

    Here are the stats from both of their best years (in PTS, PER, WS and VORP).  Both at 27 yrs old.

    • Wade ('08) - 30.2 PTS, 7.5 AST, 5.0 TRB, 1.3 BLK, 2.2 STL, 56.2 TS%, 51.6 eFG%, 9.6 VORP, 14.7 WS, 0.232 WS/48, 30.4 PER
    • Kobe ('06) - 35.4 PTS, 4.5 AST, 5.3 TRB, 0.4 BLK, 1.8 STL, 55.9 TS%, 49.1 eFG%, 8.0 VORP, 15.3 WS, 0.224 WS/48, 28.0 PER

    Tell me any of you would honestly rather play with Kobe from these years.  Wade was more efficient, had more assists, played better defense, more steals, more blocks, better WS/48, better PER, better just about everything.  And he did it all while involving his teammates to a much greater degree. 

    If there is another Kobe year that was better than Wade in 2008, go ahead and post it.

    • Like 1
  13. Wade also made an All Defense team 3 times. He got a ton of blocks for a guard and actually ranks top 30 in career blocks.

    I’ll take prime Wade and career Wade all day every day. I’m not actually sure I would pick prime Kobe over prime Wade if I was on a playground. Wade was a better teammate and would be much more fun to play with.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...