-
Posts
41658 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by David Dennison
-
-
Just now, Hank Chinaski said:
I was fine with replacing Keuchel with Miley.
But every single one of us thought that they should sign Morton. We weren't willing to pay as much as Tampa fucking Bay.
A JV/Cole/Morton/Miley/Peacock rotation would have been solid.
They got spooked when he broke down at the end of last season.
-
1 minute ago, HtownHorn said:
That's why you need 2. Relying on failed starting pitchers like McHugh and Peacock was not a sound decision.
Nope.
It's a real shame Josh James hasn't learn how to pitch. He could be a star.
-
6 minutes ago, TonyTexas said:
A new starting pitcher wouldn’t be replacing Peacock
Our past offseason is starting to look really, really bad.*
* Overreaction, but dammit we need pitching.
-
11 minutes ago, UTexasFight said:
This has a 13-12 type game feel to it
Maybe a month ago.
Now? It feels like we're about to get our doors blown off again.
-
Hot garbage.
-
Let's cut this in half at least.
-
1 minute ago, HtownHorn said:
Astros are in dire need of 1-2 starters, a couple of relievers, and a 1B.
Remember when people worried about losing 3/5 of last year's starting rotation?
This is why.
-
The Houston Astros are a bad baseball team on June 27, 2019.
-
1 minute ago, bad_teammate said:
pre-debate mids to get the nerves out
Hmmmm.
-
Hoo boy.
This team is a dumpster fire right now.
-
16 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:
Fill out this list of your presidential votes (if you're old enough).
'00 Bush
'04 Kerry
'08 Barry
'12 Barry
'16 Hilldawg -
5 minutes ago, Skipper said:
Or it could mean you are a moderate waiting for a 3rd party to emerge that actually represents your political ideology.
After 243 years, maybe next year is the year we get a viable third party.
-
Just now, Captainant said:
That's weird. Every time someone asks Nancy, she says there's no impeachment happening. Can't have impeachment hearings without impeachment proceedings. Which again, she has been painstaking to tell us aren't happening
And every time another member comes forward calling for impeachment, they do so with her blessing. She has never taken impeachment off the table. She is slowly building consensus in her caucus because right now, she does not have the votes.
-
Just now, Hugo Stiglitz said:
I'd at least have her come testify in public under oath in Congress to get it on the record, if she was up for that.
Agreed.
-
51 minutes ago, bad_teammate said:
It's a joke about her not pursuing impeachment. I'm saying she sucks and even if she did have tools to help Trump's rape victims she wouldn't use them.
They are pursuing impeachment. That's what these hearings and subpoenas are all about. That's what Mueller coming to the Hill is about. These are impeachment hearings.
-
32 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:
The GOP launched six different investigations into Benghazi and their officials screamed at the top of their lungs about EMAILS for 18 months every time they were near a camera or microphone. The Dems could try something like that.
Yep.
And who is currently the Speaker of the House?
-
26 minutes ago, wildcat09 said:
"The electorate" doesn't know shit. A majority of Americans don't know that Trump has been accused of sexual assault by 22 women. ~90% of Americans don't know about this latest allegation at all. The Dems could try acting like it's a big fucking deal and maybe some people would realize it is. The GOP made that work for using the wrong fucking email address for work shit. Pelosi should be able to make it work for literal rape.
Yes, they do. It's been all over the news.
-
I think they are going to impeach him.
Some of you think they aren't.
One of those things will happen.
Donald Trump will still be president until January 20, 2021.
-
3 minutes ago, Captainant said:
Yes it does. It shifts the legal description of their activities from "oversight" to "judicial proceeding", which will aid significantly in securing documents and testimony from people who have been resisting congressional subpoenas. Nancy doesn't want to do that because it will weaken her individual power in the house of reps. She likes to be on top, even if it's a shit mountain. She was the one driving the boat when they had a historically bad electoral loss in 2014 AND 2016. She's been in charge for all of the darkest hours of the DNC. It's not an incredible observation to see that she's been a common denominator in all of the democratic party's failings.
That's an argument. It is not law.
-
3 minutes ago, suddenly shaggy said:
Bullshit. She's trying to let Trump hang himself for the general election. Meanwhile, Trumpublicans are suppressing likely Dem votes and Putin is going to HAM.
Pelosi is a coward who is abrogating her Constitutional duty and bungling every step along the way.
We'll see.
If Donald Trump loses in 2020 and Democrats keep the House, Nancy Pelosi did the right thing. We still don't know what she is going to do. We are guessing.
-
Just now, Hugo Stiglitz said:
It's more about money than race in my opinion. The racial aspect of it makes it easy to mask what underneath: greed, control, power.
Slavery wasn't all about race either, it was mostly about the money and the power it buys.
It's about power. Which is currently held by white people. It's about protecting that power by protecting white people.
That's the story of America.
-
Just now, retread said:
She dips her toe in the arena every few days and goes on the attack. Still waiting for her and Nadler to go all in... :patient-bear::
I expect that will happen when they get back from the August break.
Bill Clinton's impeachment inquiry started in October and he was impeached in December. It can move very quickly.
-
Just now, Captainant said:
She could I dunno, not fucking shrug at another corroborated and credible rape accusation? She could open a fucking impeachment inquiry in a timely manner to get more legal weight behind their subpoenas to actually investigate trump, rather than trying to delay/time it for maximum political damage while the country is being dragged deeper every single fucking day.
We have fucking concentration camps on the border. We have historic and unprecedented levels of obstruction of legitimate (and in some cases, constitutionally mandated) congressional investigations. We have so many things wrong that she could at least be shining a light on or digging up.
We saw how much she can do to bend people to her will when it was about consolidating power to win the speakership again. And now, she's fucking powerless to do more than just shrug at all of this? Fuck that.
Calling the inquiry impeachment isn't going to put any more legal weight behind the subpoenas.
Also, Donald Trump is never going to be removed from office, so the timing of his impeachment for the best political outcome is paramount. The last thing you want to do is impeach the president and have him get re-elected.
They are going to impeach Donald Trump. They have to get the timing right because they can't remove him. That's politics and it sucks.
-
2
-
-
Just now, Onboard 2.0 said:
Oooh, scaaaaaaary stuff. A mod (who slants to the left in his posting history) calling out a poster as partisan when the whole CR is nothing but a partisan festival is beyond dull witted.
So which Democratic governors of the Commonwealth got Onboard's vote?
I'm guessing Robb. Maybe Warner.
2019 Houston Astros Thread
in Baseball
Posted
Um, why is Tony Kemp in left field?