Jump to content

MrBig

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    2269
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

3380 Surly 10%

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. You ready for Canelo/Mungiua tonight? This weather makes it so hard to stay up late for the main event when I’m already tired and it hasn’t even started.
  2. Don’t forget to add Mumford and Sons into the mix.
  3. To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar This movie is not good, but it has its moments and was pretty ahead of its time for being released in 1995. I used to sit and watch this movie with my little gay brother so my dad wouldn’t get pissed that my brother wanted to watch a bunch of drag queens instead of playing football. It also helped that the movie had Patrick Swayze and Wesley Snipes in it. My “approval” of the movie helped my brother get comfortable in his own skin and not be ashamed of being gay. A lot of young people didn’t have that kind of support back then.
  4. And I was thinking starting my own country called Tittyfuckistan was a bad idea
  5. John O’Reilly filed suit in April 2007 alleging, inter alia, a claim of misappropriation of trade secrets against Elon Musk. The alleged misconduct occurred in 1995, but O’Reilly claimed that he did not learn of it until 2005. The court, concluding that any claim that might be asserted belonged to O’Reilly’s former employer, Remote Telecom, Inc. (RTI), a suspended corporation, granted Musk’s motion for summary judgment. O’Reilly contends on appeal that the court erred in granting summary judgment. We will affirm the judgment. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND O’Reilly filed this action against Musk on April 4, 2007. In July 2007, as a self-represented litigant, he filed the operative pleading, the second amended complaint (complaint). O’Reilly alleged that in October 1995, he met with Musk, who claimed at the time to have been a student at Stanford University, to discuss the possibility of working as a salesman of O’Reilly’s Internet Merchant Channel (IMC), selling advertising to merchants. IMC “was [O’Reilly’s] proprietary, Internet-based mapping and advertising system.” The system, developed through the efforts of “[O’Reilly] and his staff” “provided a highly user-friendly interface that permitted Internet users to view merchant advertisements (such as restaurant menus) and then obtain driving directions to those merchants.” During the meeting, O’Reilly “informed Musk that IMC was proprietary and confidential, [and] Musk verbally represented to [O’Reilly] that he would keep IMC information in confidence.” (Capitalization omitted.) O’Reilly disclosed to Musk at this October meeting and on two subsequent meetings that month various aspects of the IMC, including its operation, existing and future merchant base, and pricing. O’Reilly and Musk “agreed to formalize their working relationship” after the former returned from a business trip. When O’Reilly returned, he was unable to reach Musk and thought that he had simply decided not to pursue the job. We will sometimes refer to the allegations in the complaint in this paragraph and in the succeeding two paragraphs without the prefatory “O’Reilly alleged” in order to avoid undue repetition of the phrase. Musk thereafter, having “misrepresented himself [to O’Reilly] as simply a Stanford student seeking an opportunity to sell IMC advertising, ” gained access to information about IMC that he then used to enhance a concept that he had for his own business, “Zip2.” Zip2 was sold in March 1999 to Compaq for $307,000,000 in an all-cash transaction. O’Reilly learned about Musk’s company, Zip2, and that it was described “as ‘an online map service’ company, ” upon reading a book in April 2005, nearly 10 years after meeting Musk. It was not until this time that O’Reilly became aware of Zip2, realized “(a) that he had been injured; and (b) that it was Musk who had caused the injury.” (Capitalization omitted.)
  6. Do they just sell water to the highest bidder because they can? Even if it threatens the water supply for people? https://www.texastribune.org/2024/04/12/texas-corpus-christi-water-shortage-hydrogen-clean-energy/ Water scarcity and clean energy collide in South Texas A high-tech chemical company has purchased the last available water in the Nueces River to make hydrogen and ammonia for export. Chemical company Avina Clean Hydrogen Inc. has purchased the last available water supply from the Nueces River of South Texas, raising concerns of regional scarcity as reservoirs dwindle and drought persists. Avina’s Nueces Green Ammonia plant plans to separate the hydrogen from water, convert it to ammonia and export it as a high-tech fuel alternative to oil and gas. It’s one of several such projects currently proposed in Texas, driven by federal subsidies. Governments and scientists say this technology plays an important role in the transition away from fossil fuels. But officials in the nearby city of Corpus Christi have warned that the project could threaten water supply for more than 600,000 regional customers. “Increased water drawn solely from the Nueces River system could dramatically increase the potential for scarcity,” wrote Corpus Christi’s director of intergovernmental relations, Ryan Skrobarczyk, in a March 1 memo to state lawmakers, first reported by the Corpus Christi Caller-Times. “A new large-volume user of the Nueces River will require extensive and exact monitoring to avoid increased drought restrictions.” Over the last decade, Corpus Christi stretched its water supply to its limits, selling vast volumes of Nueces River water to a string of major industrial users, hoping to meet the new demand with several large desalination plants. But those plants still haven’t materialized. Meanwhile, the new industrial customers have ramped up operations while a multi-year drought bore down. Local residents have been under water-use restrictions for more than 600 days as reservoirs have fallen below one-third full. Although Corpus Christi holds rights to the vast majority of Nueces River water, it doesn’t hold them all, as it was recently reminded. The only other significant right belongs to the Nueces County Water Improvement and Control District #3, which serves the towns of Calallen and Robstown. It has rights from 1909 that were originally intended to flood crop fields and haven’t been used in decades. That’s where Avina found the means to purchase 5.5 million gallons of treated Nueces River water per day—enough for all 38,000 residents of Calallen and Robstown to each flush their toilets 90 times daily—for the next 25 years. “Do I want them there? No. But I can’t be biased,” said Marcos Alaniz, general manager of the Nueces County Water Control and Improvement District #3 outside of Corpus Christi. “I don’t have a right to tell somebody that I cannot feed them water.” He cited rules from the Texas Public Utility Commission that listed five reasons why water providers may refuse service. Compromising the regional supply wasn’t among them. “It’s just the fact that we’re pulling more out of the reservoirs than we’re putting in. But that’s not for me to say,” Alaniz said. A spokesperson for Avina in New Jersey, Karen White, said the company “takes seriously the water/energy nexus and is engineering the most water conscious plant design, opting for dry cooling, reuse and reduction wherever possible.” In a March 6 email to Corpus Christi City Council, City Manager Peter Zanoni warned the Avina project could increase water prices to all city water users. “The loss of millions of gallons of water a day will have an impact on our water supplies. To backfill that loss will potentially result in rate impacts to all [Corpus Christi Water] customers,” Zanoni wrote. The city of Corpus Christi and its water department declined to answer questions. The hydrogen boom Avina is one of at least 30 hydrogen and ammonia projects currently proposed in Texas, according to data from the Environmental Integrity Project, following federal legislation that laid out financial incentives for fossil fuel alternatives, aimed at reducing emissions of greenhouse gasses. “In the future, hydrogen will be used to replace diesel,” said Joe Powell, director of the Energy Transition Institute at the University of Houston and a former chief scientist at Shell. “I see it as a good jobs transition opportunity for this [Houston] region to be securing its place in the future.” Most of those projects produce hydrogen the old-fashioned way, from natural gas, but incorporate new measures to capture the high volume of carbon emissions and inject them underground for disposal instead of releasing them into the air. Ten of the projects use a method called electrolysisthat doesn’t directly involve oil or gas. Instead, it uses a large volume of water and a tremendous amount of electricity to separate the hydrogen from water molecules. When powered by clean energy, the process releases no carbon emissions. The technology isn’t new, but it wasn’t considered economically feasible until the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 laid out steep federal subsidies for hydrogen projects. One such project in North Texas plans to build 1.4 gigawatts of wind and solar power generation and pump 500,000 gallons of groundwater per day to produce 200,000 kilograms of hydrogen for fuel. Another project on Matagorda Bay will use water to produce hydrogen for so-called “eFuels.” Avina also plans a second electrolysis plant in South Texas to fuel furnaces for steel production. But there’s a hangup. Hydrogen gas is nearly impossible to transport. It needs to be liquified at about -500 Fahrenheit then held at that temperature. So instead, scientists devised an alternative: convert the hydrogen to ammonia (a stable liquid made of hydrogen and nitrogen), ship it overseas then re-convert to hydrogen. It’s an inefficient process. Up to 40% of the original energy input is lost in the production, conversion and re-conversion of the hydrogen, said Hugh Daigle, an associate professor of petroleum engineering at the University of Texas who has studied the hydrogen economy. But, it produces a carbonless fuel that can power heavy vehicles without harmful emissions. “To make one molecule of H2 it takes 1 molecule of water,” Daigle said. If developed at scale, he said, “that is going to take a lot of water.” Nueces County ammonia plant The Avina spokesperson, White, said the company selected its Nueces County location based on its proximity to renewable energy resources (wind farms cover millions of acres in South Texas) and its relay access to the Port of Corpus Christi. Federal tax incentives require electrolysis projects to run on renewable energy, with extra benefits if the energy projects are new. White said Avina’s Nueces ammonia plant will be powered by 3.5 gigawatts of new renewable power projects, but those contracts haven’t been finalized yet. The news of another water-intensive industrial project in the region surprised Encarnacion Serna, a retired chemical engineer who spent his career in local refineries. “They keep bringing in more and more industry and there is no water,” he said. “It's a horrible disaster just waiting to happen.” Serna, 72, has nothing against the industrial sector. He raised his family while working in these plants, including five years at ExxonMobil, 15 years at Occidental Chemical and three years at Air Liquide. But, he said, it’s gone too far. He listed the recent, major additions to the region’s waterside industrial sector: Cheniere LNG, Voestalpine steel, Chemours chemicals and a trio of massive new oil export terminals, among others. One new plastics plant by ExxonMobil and the Saudi Basic Industries Corp. has contracts to use up to 25 million gallons of treated water per day. All this growth was supposed to be supported by the development of several new seawater desalination plants. But while the industrial customers are now operating, plans for the desalination plants have floundered, mired in years of delays. “They spent millions of dollars pushing desalination and all the money went to lawyers, permitting and public relations,” Serna said. “The idiots sold water they didn’t have.” Avina plans to produce 3.2 billion gallons of ammonia per year at the Nueces County plant, according to its application. Serna calculated how much hydrogen that would require, and how much water in turn, coming up with 9.5 million gallons per day—almost twice Avina’s contracted water supply. Alaniz, manager of WCID #3, said Avina will put in groundwater wells to make up the difference. (The company did not respond to questions about its total planned water use.) WCID #3’s 1909 water rights from the Nueces River allow for 10.5 million gallons per day. Originally, that water was meant for crop irrigation, but over time the farm fields turned into neighborhoods, which use much less water. Still, WCID #3 held onto its rights. “This will be our first industrial customer,” Alaniz said. “Until you can figure out how we can get more water, it’s probably my last.”
  7. I still think all the low lakes and weak river flows are caused by illegal dams being built on private property that we can’t see. We’ve had droughts before but the lake levels are dropping at a rate inconsistent with the amount of rain and development in the surrounding areas. It’s bullshit and needs to be stopped. https://www.kxan.com/texas-water/illegal-dam-on-james-river-torn-down-while-another-dam-pops-up-in-mason-county/ MASON COUNTY, Texas (KXAN) — An illegal dam in the Texas Hill Country is being demolished following reports from KXAN. The dam, constructed along the James River in Mason County, was built in 2023. Investigations from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) found the dam was constructed without permits. Meanwhile, in western Mason County, a second dam has been located along Leon Creek. This dam was also built without permits, according to TPWD. “We’re sure glad that that damn dam is gone,” said Susan Keeling, a landowner who lives further down the James River. She and her sister, Kathy Zesch-Bradley, told KXAN about the dam after noticing the river had slowed to trickle. “During dry seasons, ranchers in the hill country need that water in their rivers for their wildlife and their livestock,” Keeling said. The James River feeds into the Llano River, which provides water to Lake Travis, Austin’s water supply. In October, KXAN crews visited the dam and witnessed it holding back several feet of water, while the other side of the river remained completely dry. Restoring the James River In May 2023, a 404-acre plot of land was purchased by an entity called ‘Neusch Mason, LLC.’ Mason County Appraisal District records link the LLC to Bill Neusch, CEO of Gibraltar. That company has built and installed more than 150 miles of the Texas/Mexico border wall, according to its website. In September, TPWD informed Neusch Mason, LLC that they had violated the law and must submit a restoration plan. That plan was due November 20, but TPWD provided an extension until December 20. On January 17, 2024 TPWD told Neusch Mason, LLC in a letter that “any structure left below the gradient boundary of the James River must meet the requirements set out in Chapter 86” of the Texas Administrative Code. Additionally, the dam must be “removed entirely” from the low water channel, ensuring the James River’s flow returns to normal. Neusch Mason, LLC submitted a restoration plan on March 20, 2024, which was then approved by TPWD. According to the restoration plan, 310 feet of the 400-foot wide dam had to be removed from the river. Two ramps could be constructed to provide access across the river. Work was approved on March 22 and began on April 1. The project is required to be complete by April 30, contingent on weather, according to TPWD. “I certainly think that justice has prevailed here because such a travesty to hurt many, just for the pleasure of one person,” Keeling said. KXAN reached out to Bill Neusch, but his attorney declined to comment. Another illegal dam discovered While water now flows on the James River, ten miles away at Leon Creek in Mason County, another illegal dam built in a remote area is restricting access to water. “In September, my husband went to check the cattle and went down to where the creek goes into the Llano river. And the creek was only a trickle,” said Kerry Hormann, a landowner in Mason County. Hofmann’s family has owned land along Leon Creek for more than a century. She said this is the first time it has stopped flowing. Neighbors living further upstream told Hofmann they had discovered a dam had appeared along the creek. Hofmann said it was the first time they heard anything about the dam. They were not notified that the landowner was building a dam. It was completely built “sometime in the summer” by the time Hofmann discovered its construction. Both TCEQ and TPWD told KXAN they are investigating this dam. This dam, it is important to note, is NOT on land owned by Neusch Mason, LLC. TPWD told KXAN that the dam “does not have a sand and gravel permit issued by the agency.” They are investigating the “disturbance or taking of marl, sand, gravel, shell and mudshell.” Issues related to water impoundment fall under the TCEQ, who declined to provide further details about their ongoing investigation. Hofmann said all they want is the restoration of the creek’s flow. She said that since they discovered the dam, some water has returned to the creek, but its not what is typical this time of year.
  8. Tell me you overpaid for Full Self Driving without telling me you overpaid for Full Self Driving.
  9. Gen Z is the only generation that’s never jerked off to scrambled porn
  10. Garth Brooks is really good at sketch comedy. I never would’ve expected that.
  11. Those people with their bodies in the lake…
×
×
  • Create New...