- Popular Post
-
Posts
875 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Genco
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
3 minutes ago, Js1 said:Team Jordan is telling Rs to vote against the McHenry motion and he’s willing to go 100 ballots if that’s what it takes
- 1
- 9
- 1
-
10 hours ago, C-Man said:
Yeah, that shows us as a preview on Tapatalk for this thread. Anything that can be done about that?- 3
-
Edit: Mistook this for the smut board.
-
-
The expectation from the start was that there would be no democrat support if one of the lunatics filed the MTV. Otherwise the single member MTV that McCarthy capitulated to would have had no power.
McCarthy chose to appease and empower terrorists rather than barter in good faith with democrats.
- 6
- 1
-
This thread sucks now.
- 6
- 3
-
44 minutes ago, cactusflinthead said:
Yeah he's already regretting that
I don't know if I'm gonna be putting on this headset again.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Beau Vine said:
Because she's responsible for this, not Tucker? Is that what you're saying?
- 1
- 1
-
1 hour ago, InkaUtexas said:
This video says it was landing.
- 2
- 1
-
7 minutes ago, DalTxHornFan said:
Silly me. I thought that summary judgment motions dealt solely with legal rather than disputed factual issues.
And I used to think that disputed factual issues were dealt with in a court proceeding that was subject to rebuttal and cross examination.
Who knew?
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
26 minutes ago, DefinitelyNotHollywoodColt said:well shit, sorry. Thread moves fast and I went back multiple times and didn't see it.
Is this a diplomatic bluff to resolve the grain issue more favorability for Poland?
- 1
- 15
-
6 hours ago, Sawbonz said:
What specialty? Simple question
Brazilian proctology
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
9 minutes ago, Ghost of LL said:How in the literal fuck?
I mean, seriously--he must be one charming motherfucker.
- 2
- 18
-
On 9/9/2023 at 10:30 AM, Helobious said:
Actually reading about these cases and holy shit it’s kind of wild he got convicted. No physical or corroborating evidence whatsoever and all 3 witnesses changed their story at least at some point, some multiple times. Damn.
Now I'm 100% certain the dude is guilty.
- 3
- 1
- 3
-
26 minutes ago, The Dog said:
I just don't understand why he rolled on the fed stuff but not on the Georgia stuff. Does he really think he can beat the rap?
- 6
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Brisketexan said:
My best (worst) cross-examination was early in my career....when a witness had completely skewered my client's story, backed up with photographic proof. After pondering what to do for what felt like an eternity, I fired off this piece of brilliance:
Q: "So . . . are you calling my client a liar?"
A: "Yes."
[Looooooooooooong pause]
Judge: "Mr. Brisket, you about done here?"
"Yes. Yes I am."
So, the lesson here is that when you have nothing to offer on cross.....sometimes shutting the fuck up is your best line of questioning.
- 1
- 3
-
1 hour ago, Patricio Swayze said:
There are A LOT of people in this country that get offended by women breastfeeding in public. Fucking absurd.As well as the men masturbating nearby. Thanks a lot bin laden.
-
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
13 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:Woodward appears to be pissing down his leg on this, mostly because the government did everything pretty much correctly, but got the unsealing orders ex parte, so Woodward was unaware. Inasmuch as no witness has the right to counsel at a grand jury hearing, I'm not sure there's anything wrong with such ex parte filings. But, the government can let a lawyer's nose into the tent, and that appears to have happened here. Not sure what their obligations are here.
- 2
- 9
- 1
-
On 8/23/2023 at 9:44 PM, TornACL said:
If you wrote an HBO series about a dysfunctional pro football franchise, and had the owner saying this, they'd throw you out if the writer's room.
Did you see ESPN's attempt at dramatic television? About as subtle as Oliver Stone.
-
10 minutes ago, Al Bundy's Napoleon Hand said:
I guess we just don't know the art of the deal. Seriously though, this is more curious to me than his weight.
If the trial occurs after the election, the PAC doesn't have the use of the $200k for the campaign. It'll be sitting on Rice St. earning 0%.
If he uses Four Seasons Bail Bonds, the PAC will still have $180k available to spend prior to November 2024.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Francisco 2.0 said:
So, I have to ask. If he's as wealthy as he brags about, why is he using a bail bondsman?
1 hour ago, C-Man said:
#1 on Trump’s Rules — always use other people’s money when at all possible$180k today is more valuable to the Trump PAC than $200k after the trial (and likely after the election).
45 indicated
in Cloak Room
Posted
DIS-CLAAAAAAIM-MERRRRR!!
Disclaimer