Jump to content

Dahobbs

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    17879
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dahobbs

  1. Just now, Cairn Horn88 said:

    Seems like, at times, we just walk up to the plate and just swing and frail away…..bam, bam, bam.

    Galvan can look awful at times.

    That's our whole lineup. Kimble is most consistent I think. 

  2. 1 minute ago, Valmy77 said:

    He probably should not have taken that, but still a good at bat for Will either way.

    Not giving them those borderline calls outside so far. 

  3. 16 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:

    This is fucking hideous.

    It is, but I honestly I don't know what it means. Even if SCOTUS didn't find the provision itself unconstitutional (which I think it would be), what does it mean to use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt order? Does issuing an order use funds? Is issuing an order for the executive branch to enforce a use of "appropriated funds" by the judicial branch? Is the executive branch no longer required to enforce the law or a lawful order?  And practically speaking, it doesn't appear to set any minimum requirement for the security or bond. And it doesn't appear to require the security be the funding mechanism. So a court could require a party to post a $1 bond, and then it could use "appropriated funds" to enforce a contempt order. 

    • Hook 'Em 3
  4. 7 minutes ago, 'stache said:

    Thank god, no publicly funded religious charter schools in Oklahoma. No opinion as it was an equally divided court. Barrett recused, she's hardcore catholic but has shown some reasonableness on big issues. No telling which way she might have swayed the decision. I doubt it's the last we hear of this though. The Oklahoma Supreme Court's decision, to my memory, turned on the Oklahoma constitution that is far more clear than the US Constitition on this issue. It flat out says: "No public money or property shall ever be appropriated, applied, donated, or used, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, or system of religion, or for the use, benefit, or support of any priest, preacher, minister, or other religious teacher or dignitary, or sectarian institution as such." I'm sure another state without this language will try again soon. 

     

     

    May be an image of text that says 'Opinion) Cite as: Per Curiam NOTICE opinion States Supreme subject Readers formal revision before Reporter States, Vashington, typographical other formal errors. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Nos. 24-394 and 24-396 OKLAHOMA STATEWIDE CHARTER SCHOOL BOARD, ET PETITIONERS 24-394 GENTNER DRUMMOND, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA, REL. OIH ISIDORE OF SEVILLE CATHOLIC VIRTUAL SCHOOL, PETITIONER 24-396 GENTNER DRUMMOND, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA, EX REL. OKLAHOMA ON WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PER CURIAM. [May 22, 2025] The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court. JUSTICE BARRETT took no part in the consideration or cision of these'

    I'm perplexed what those that would have reversed would have done. If the issue is what the Oklahoma Constitution says, on what basis could the Court change the outcome?

  5. 34 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:

    I had not seen the multiple 911 calls about the man with the rifle directing traffic in the street, approaching cars and calling himself private security.

    The OP insinuates that ATX was fighting the release of these documents, why?

    I don't know, why did you insinuate that?

  6. 15 hours ago, rage-a-holic said:

    Except it isn't "some random loser dumbass", it's representative of a large segment of the population that thinks this little shithead murderer was 

    • framed
    • defending himself
    • upper management and statue material

     

    No, it is the account of a either a crazy person, a bot, or a someone just trying to get views. Go look at his other posts. Getting yourself worked up because this person posts inane rants is stupid. Stop with the "rage" and try thinking for half a second. 

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Haha 1
  7. 4 minutes ago, B00M said:

    What? In what universe does it make any sense to pretend the play didn’t occur? Surely we’re not this stupid.

    I have no idea what rule people are citing on this. NCAA rule 5-9 says a halted game begins exactly where it left off. I know of no rule that would reset an inning. 

    • Hook 'Em 3
    • Like 1
  8. Just now, dcar00 said:

    jesus christ. 4 straight balls if just leaves his bat on the shoulder.  time for him to transfer.

    Honestly, we brought him on to bunt, he should have just done that. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
×
×
  • Create New...