
Dahobbs
-
Posts
17879 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Dahobbs
-
-
1 minute ago, Valmy77 said:
It's ok Mendoza will get it done.
or swing wildly at high fast balls.
-
1
-
-
Wtf Mendoza...
-
Come on Mendoza, get us some runs.
-
Yuck, can't take that. Nice pitch though.
-
1 minute ago, Valmy77 said:
He probably should not have taken that, but still a good at bat for Will either way.
Not giving them those borderline calls outside so far.
-
1 minute ago, SydneyCarton said:
Hoo boy I did not think that was ball 4.
But i'll fucking taaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaake it.
Nah, that was a ball.
-
Bats aren't hitting hard right now, but our approach at the plate is excellent so far. 35 pitches with 1 out in the 2nd.
-
another nice half-inning. Walker looking strong so far.
-
16 minutes ago, TwiceHorn said:
This is fucking hideous.
It is, but I honestly I don't know what it means. Even if SCOTUS didn't find the provision itself unconstitutional (which I think it would be), what does it mean to use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt order? Does issuing an order use funds? Is issuing an order for the executive branch to enforce a use of "appropriated funds" by the judicial branch? Is the executive branch no longer required to enforce the law or a lawful order? And practically speaking, it doesn't appear to set any minimum requirement for the security or bond. And it doesn't appear to require the security be the funding mechanism. So a court could require a party to post a $1 bond, and then it could use "appropriated funds" to enforce a contempt order.
-
3
-
-
7 minutes ago, 'stache said:
Thank god, no publicly funded religious charter schools in Oklahoma. No opinion as it was an equally divided court. Barrett recused, she's hardcore catholic but has shown some reasonableness on big issues. No telling which way she might have swayed the decision. I doubt it's the last we hear of this though. The Oklahoma Supreme Court's decision, to my memory, turned on the Oklahoma constitution that is far more clear than the US Constitition on this issue. It flat out says: "No public money or property shall ever be appropriated, applied, donated, or used, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, or system of religion, or for the use, benefit, or support of any priest, preacher, minister, or other religious teacher or dignitary, or sectarian institution as such." I'm sure another state without this language will try again soon.
I'm perplexed what those that would have reversed would have done. If the issue is what the Oklahoma Constitution says, on what basis could the Court change the outcome?
-
34 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:
I had not seen the multiple 911 calls about the man with the rifle directing traffic in the street, approaching cars and calling himself private security.
The OP insinuates that ATX was fighting the release of these documents, why?
I don't know, why did you insinuate that?
-
10 minutes ago, ChickenSandwich said:
Some new information i haven’t seen previously
What is it that you think is new here?
-
15 hours ago, rage-a-holic said:
Except it isn't "some random loser dumbass", it's representative of a large segment of the population that thinks this little shithead murderer was
- framed
- defending himself
- upper management and statue material
No, it is the account of a either a crazy person, a bot, or a someone just trying to get views. Go look at his other posts. Getting yourself worked up because this person posts inane rants is stupid. Stop with the "rage" and try thinking for half a second.
-
2
-
1
-
Winner!
-
1
-
-
Game, blouses.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, B00M said:
What? In what universe does it make any sense to pretend the play didn’t occur? Surely we’re not this stupid.
I have no idea what rule people are citing on this. NCAA rule 5-9 says a halted game begins exactly where it left off. I know of no rule that would reset an inning.
-
3
-
1
-
-
Safe!!!!!!
-
1 minute ago, BERT said:
We’re gonna have the first one legged catcher
Given how much he gets beat up, that may be all there is of him
-
"maybe" a little bit outside?!?!?
-
No chance at that tag.
-
Just now, dcar00 said:
jesus christ. 4 straight balls if just leaves his bat on the shoulder. time for him to transfer.
Honestly, we brought him on to bunt, he should have just done that.
-
1
-
-
That may be the worst AB I have ever seen.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
Just now, hobbes2702 said:
Swing the bat Rylan.
Well... He did?
-
1
-
-
Well fuck. Good job holding him by pretending to tag.
2025 SEC Tournament
in Baseball
Posted
That's our whole lineup. Kimble is most consistent I think.