Jump to content

Dahobbs

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    18032
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dahobbs

  1. Arch was throwing short all day. Nothing about that play suggested anything different.
  2. What... that review was ridiculous.
  3. UTSA out thinking itself. The toss to henry would have gone for a lot of yards there.
  4. Arch would have thrown that in the dirt today.
  5. I would prefer it not be a shitty year. I'm ok with a shitty game.
  6. That was a stupid throw.
  7. So... he is going to rush for over 200 today, isn't he?
  8. Henry still pretty good.
  9. Ok, that 3rd down call sucks.
  10. I think that is a fumble.
  11. Because Arch can't throw them.
  12. Henry is pretty good.
  13. Looks like Clemson's defense is starting where it left off last season.
  14. UTSA may just want to kick the ball out of bounds at this point.
  15. I like that fake toss and shovel play.
  16. Nice fucking throw.
  17. Arch was bad, full stop. No game plan was going to make his play today anything but terrible. That's just the way it is. Sark's game plan probably wasn't the best. But if Arch makes the easy throws, we win.
  18. Ok, by why didn't Sark call more plays to Arch's strength, like simple roll outs that cut the field in half and give him a wide open throw? Oh wait...
  19. Yes, last year Texas played a much better Ohio State team. They could stop the run easily (and I think our run game is going to be pretty good this year). More of the game was on Ewers as a result, and against a better defense, he wasn't good enough to get it done. Again, this is a stupid post. Sark his issues in the redzone. But that wasn't the primary problem today. It was a problem, to be sure. But it wasn't the primary problem. Quinn wins today fairly easily. Hudson Card probably wins today. Swoopes probably wins today. Arch played a no good, very bad, terrible game today. That's just how it is. He'll be better (I hope).
  20. Uh, so you don't think Quinn would have beat Ohio State last year if the defense held them to 203 total yards and our team was able to run for 166 yards at 4.5 a pop? Again, it isn't the same teams. This is a stupid post.
  21. Sark has his weaknesses. But your post is nonsense. We didn't see Quinn against this OSU team with this Texas team. OSU isn't the same team as last year. There were more plays to be made against that defense this year. Given that clean of a pocket, Quinn would have cooked today. I get you want to bash Sark. But your analysis here is bad. And I think you know it.
  22. OSU played good defense. But the receivers got open and Arch missed them. They weren't consistently open, but they were a lot of plays to be made that Arch missed, badly.
  23. It is accurate. It may actually under count his misses.
  24. Ewers would have won today too. It would have looked a lot like his Alabama game. Sark had problems with Ewers, but he didn't have the same problems. You're a hammer and everything looks like a nail to you right now. While, redzone play calling is an issue, it wasn't the primary issue today. I guarantee if you just watch all of Arch's throws back-to-back-to-back, you'll agree. He was the problem today. And that's ok. I think he'll get better.
×
×
  • Create New...