Jump to content

syd vicious

New Members
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

5 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thank you for sharing. Yes, the protests were squashed. So again, Hamas is in charge. Not sure how you justify them being handed a state. “The protesters directed their anger at Hamas's leadership after an interview with senior official Sami Abu Zuhri circulated on social media. Speaking on a podcast which originally aired in late March, he said that the war with Israel was "eternal", adding: "We will rebuild the houses and produce dozens more babies for each martyr."” Who are you quoting?
  2. Wow that is really helpful. Unfortunately it appears I am unable to post there. Until I can, I guess I'll have to wait here for the news stories showing anti-Hamas Gazans comfortably expressing their views. In lieu of seeing that in significant amounts I'll have to believe that Hamas is still in charge there. As long as that is the case it is irrelevant what these other nations like France and the Uk think.
  3. No thanks, I'm good. I don't see what’s political about what we're discussing. The discussion was around news of the potential recognition of a Palestinian state. It’s a bad idea, because that’s recognizing Hamas. Others claim, Hamas wouldn't be in charge of Palestinian state despite ruling Gaza. I asked for signs of any anti Hamas protests and some kind of moderate leader to step in. That should be easy to find in the news. Again, the dog that didn't bark.
  4. Also, to add to this, if there really is a power vacuum then there should be some more moderate leaders in Gaza speaking out. And again, they would rightly be amplified. I've heard of none. If you're aware of any moderate voices there, I would love for any of the posters here to share them. Thank you.
  5. Pre war, Hamas was numbered at 30-40,000. I don't equate Hamas with Palestinians overall. No way to tell how many of the 60,000 dead are Hamas. You're assuming the stranglehold has been broken. But I've only seen sporadic reports over these months of any anti-Hamas protests in Gaza. They get squashed quickly if they happen. If Hamas were truly decimated then you would see large scale demonstrations against them by the civilian population. And they would’ve been reported on massively. Their absence is the dog that didn't bark.
  6. Given what you've stated above, what do you think happens if fingers are snapped and there’s a Palestinian state? Who is most likely to be in charge?
  7. Why are any of us here? I have a family member that lived in Tel Aviv on 10/07. He has since left, but he gives me some interesting perspective not seen in this thread, to say the least. Your comparisons are faulty. Hamas are terrorists. No air quotes needed. Their aims have always been explicit. Rewarding them for 10/7 with a state recognition is the wrong move.
  8. Explain the similarities
  9. Rewarding Hamas with an official Palestinian state after their terrorist attacks would be counterproductive. If large scale terrorism benefits them to that extent, then I'd expect more from them and other terrorist organizations as well.
  10. This transparency is going to contribute to the downfall. They can be counter traded. Prices can be moved by other entities to where they lose money. With this burst in retail interest, I'm sure hedge funds and other traders are now looking at how to capitalize on it. You should read about Long Term Capital Management. The best and the brightest. Nobel Prize winners. Had a great couple of years. Ended in the first big Wall St bailout.
×
×
  • Create New...