Jump to content

Message Board User

Full Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Message Board User last won the day on April 21

Message Board User had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

3,874 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The Valley is getting crushed. More cases in Hidalgo County than Dallas.
  2. Yeah Hidalgo had more cases today than Dallas County despite 1/3 the population. 😬
  3. I think her point was that it is ridiculous to ask anyone to self-quarantine (especially if they are without symptoms) for over a week while awaiting test results. And she is right...unless you believe that waiting covid results for 7+ days is perfectly reasonable. It's also quite common for mayors and other VIPs to be tested frequently, so this may have been a "proactive" test. Shit, was watching the news tonight and one guy was interviewed who said it took 27 days to get his results. Is he expected to quarantine for that long? Stories abound across the country with ridiculous wait times -
  4. Amen Keisha. Amen. <------------------------------- Tested June 29 and I still haven't received results.
  5. Thought this was an exceptionally relevant piece today and the range of signatories is impressive - David Frum, Gloria Steinem, Wynton Marsalis, Margaret Atwood, Zaid Jilani, Noam Chomsky, Kmele Foster, Salman Rushdie, Malcolm Gladwell, Garry Kasparov, and Fareed Zakaria among others. https://harpers.org/a-letter-on-justice-and-open-debate/ A Letter on Justice and Open Debate July 7, 2020 The below letter will be appearing in the Letters section of the magazine’s October issue. We welcome responses at letters@harpers.org Our cultural institutions are facing a moment of trial. Powerful protests for racial and social justice are leading to overdue demands for police reform, along with wider calls for greater equality and inclusion across our society, not least in higher education, journalism, philanthropy, and the arts. But this needed reckoning has also intensified a new set of moral attitudes and political commitments that tend to weaken our norms of open debate and toleration of differences in favor of ideological conformity. As we applaud the first development, we also raise our voices against the second. The forces of illiberalism are gaining strength throughout the world and have a powerful ally in Donald Trump, who represents a real threat to democracy. But resistance must not be allowed to harden into its own brand of dogma or coercion—which right-wing demagogues are already exploiting. The democratic inclusion we want can be achieved only if we speak out against the intolerant climate that has set in on all sides. The free exchange of information and ideas, the lifeblood of a liberal society, is daily becoming more constricted. While we have come to expect this on the radical right, censoriousness is also spreading more widely in our culture: an intolerance of opposing views, a vogue for public shaming and ostracism, and the tendency to dissolve complex policy issues in a blinding moral certainty. We uphold the value of robust and even caustic counter-speech from all quarters. But it is now all too common to hear calls for swift and severe retribution in response to perceived transgressions of speech and thought. More troubling still, institutional leaders, in a spirit of panicked damage control, are delivering hasty and disproportionate punishments instead of considered reforms. Editors are fired for running controversial pieces; books are withdrawn for alleged inauthenticity; journalists are barred from writing on certain topics; professors are investigated for quoting works of literature in class; a researcher is fired for circulating a peer-reviewed academic study; and the heads of organizations are ousted for what are sometimes just clumsy mistakes. Whatever the arguments around each particular incident, the result has been to steadily narrow the boundaries of what can be said without the threat of reprisal. We are already paying the price in greater risk aversion among writers, artists, and journalists who fear for their livelihoods if they depart from the consensus, or even lack sufficient zeal in agreement. This stifling atmosphere will ultimately harm the most vital causes of our time. The restriction of debate, whether by a repressive government or an intolerant society, invariably hurts those who lack power and makes everyone less capable of democratic participation. The way to defeat bad ideas is by exposure, argument, and persuasion, not by trying to silence or wish them away. We refuse any false choice between justice and freedom, which cannot exist without each other. As writers we need a culture that leaves us room for experimentation, risk taking, and even mistakes. We need to preserve the possibility of good-faith disagreement without dire professional consequences. If we won’t defend the very thing on which our work depends, we shouldn’t expect the public or the state to defend it for us.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Recruiting ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Help ... For Sale ... Politics ... Board Discussion
  • Create New...