-
Posts
24793 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
10
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Surly Bevo
-
-
4 minutes ago, Sir Ulrich said:
And yet the better coach by far last night
Sark seemingly has a LOT of issues but this isn't one of them. If every fucker on here had a camera on them at the level of college football coaches I am sure there would be some action/outburst that you each wouldn't be very proud of.
-
4 minutes ago, gurt said:
Satyanash was right once again but the blind optimists shit all over him like they do every time.
Oh fuck off with this shit. When you are doom and gloom 24/7/365 you are gonna be right sometimes.
-
3
-
-
35 minutes ago, Steelers Roll Left said:
On the “Sark got out coached” narrative, I would just like to offer these thoughts: (1) Kirby going for it in a 14-10 game on 4th down twice on his side of the field, especially the 4th & 5 near midfield was just plain moronic……and it worked, (2) Likewise, trying an onside kick w/ a 21-10 game in which the opposing offense has struggled to score on your defense all game, a play that has a very low success rate, was also moronic….and it worked again. The narrative this morning is the genius of Smart negotiating that 4th quarter. But if the overwhelming odds in our favor played out in these scenarios, the same people anointing Smart would be shining the spotlight on his riverboat gambling stupidity.
The onside kick was genius given the game flow and the situation at that moment. They had an 11-point lead; we had only scored 10. Even if it doesn't work out we have to score two TDs to win or a TD, 2pt conversion and a FG to tie and get to OT. It was a perfect gamble in the moment, with very limited downside risk and huge potential upside to deliver a killing blow.....which it did.
-
3
-
-
6 minutes ago, Derka said:
another stat from last night:
33 rushing yards on the opening drive, -10 rushing yards thereafter
@Thatguy why does sark abandon the run like this so often? i’ve never seen a team that could the biggest games by just replacing the running game with quick throws. does sark really think he can do that?
Yeah, I posted in the game week thread that of the last 5 games Georgia has lost since the beginning of the 2022 season, the ONLY game they lost where their opponent did not outrush them was Alabama earlier this year (and Alabama just has a weird voodoo curse on UGA).
You have to stay with the run to beat that team. Now maybe we just can't because our Oline is so fucking bad (also Sark's fault) but felt like we didn't even really try.
-
This thread and OP are pathetic
-
1
-
-
Sarks passing schemes are fine. His receivers drop too many balls and I suspect that is primarily on the position coach and he needs to deal with that as the head man.
His running schemes and play call sequencing are doghit and that’s all on him.
His overall game management is meadoker. Generally bad against the upper upper crust.
He’s getting more time but I’m skeptical that this is fixable-
4
-
-
Just now, David Dennison said:
But they might, which explains the high anxiety.
I got zero anxiety about aggy, OU or Tech winning 3 or 4 games against the best teams in the country.
-
24 minutes ago, Cairn Horn88 said:
But, we did make Tech, OU and aggy fans happy happy tonight.
None of them are winning shit and the reality in the college game these days is that if you are not hoisting the trophy at the end nobody gives a shit.
Hell they barely care even if you do. NFL playoffs to get on to.
-
We have 19 rushing yards to their 130ish Never going to beat Georgia that way
-
2 minutes ago, Duane Moore said:
Gerry making the point that the spike in the end zone after the TD should have been an automatic 15 yard penalty. If that is called, UGA doesn’t onside kick. Big no call in UGA’s favor.
Loser takk
-
Sucks to watch Arch finally come into his own and these pass catchers just keep fucking us in the ass.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
Pass rushers getting routinely held plus 10 yard cushions is a bad combo.
-
2
-
-
Just now, J-Mart said:
I will never understand the score-commercial-kickoff-commercial sequence. It makes me ragey.
They have a certain number of commercial breaks they gotta do a quarter and there have been two long multi play drives eating up most of it.
-
2
-
-
Guilbeau seems like he sucks
-
Does ALABAMA even try to run the ball anymore?
-
Just now, Billy Pilgrim said:
Matt Austin has got to be the worst rules analyst. Convince me I’m wrong.
Rules analysts in general are the worst. You already got two guys in there. A PBP guy and a color guy. They both usually work one game a week. You telling me they can't spend some time during the week learning the nuances of the rules and comment on them.
-
No PI there is interesting
-
Good job, good effort
-
Just punt the ball
-
One again, trying to make Sellars a pocket passer is a choice.
-
1 minute ago, wood said:
The fact that this is still a 1-point game should tell people everything they need to know about this aggy team.
What it's telling me is Reed is pretty bad when he's getting pressure and his first read isn't there. When that's not happening he's pretty good.
-
Sellars is so gimpy
-
A lot of nuts are being squeezed right now....they out there squeezing nuts.
-
They recovered that fumble but fuck off with this...
2025 Week 13: Arkansas @ Texas.
in Football
Posted · Edited by Surly Bevo
I really don't give a shit about making the CFP. After a game like that one last night IN November it is clear we don't have a team that is winning 4 straight games against the best in the country, so who gives a shit. Who remembers who all was in the NFL playoffs in 2023?
And look, I get it if you are a Tech, who has never sniffed a conference champ game, much less an outright conference title, or an SMU last year, etc etc making the CFP and getting bounced IS a big deal. If you are a program with the expectations of Texas making the CFP this year, with our inconsistent as fuck squad is a pointless endeavour.