Jump to content

Clob94

banned
  • Posts

    193
  • Joined

Posts posted by Clob94

  1. 10 minutes ago, Patrick Bateman said:

    Thank you, I understand they may have been in transit to the party, but I don't understand how this would be some sort of indictment on Elliott.  They could have been going to breakfast or another party or wherever and this could have happened.  How would Herman infer this wouldn't have happened if Elliott wasn't involved?  Just seems weird to tie it around Elliott's neck.  

    Spitball guess? 

    If you were where you were supposed to be (class, practice) this wouldn't have happened. 

    Best off the wall guess I could make. 

    • Fuck You 1
  2. 1 hour ago, Chuckie Finster said:

    To be clear, clob registered on this site on 3/29 and made a post that day.  Then he was completely silent until he jumped head first into the Stormy Daniels and Strzok threads on July 12, and he has been a fairly prolific poster since then.  

    There isn't a more obvious sock on the board.  If there's a way to find out who was banned on 7/12, then I'm fairly sure we all will know who this is.

    You have no clue who I am and again, I will reiterate, I've never had a sock or any other posting name/trolling account on this site. Feel free to include the mod in searching my ip address or whatever. But before you do this, let's each put 10k in a PayPal account so I can at least make some money off of you.... if you're so certain. 

  3. 1 hour ago, Huckleberry said:

    Claims Longhorns should be above name-calling, refers to others as using nazi tactics.

    Oh wait, the hypocrisy has already been well-established. Nothing new here.

    Identifying tactics and calling people personal insults are two different things. 

    Ex: You're a little dicked jack ass -- vs. 

    You're acting like a jackass with a little dick. 

    See the difference? 

     

  4. 19 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

    Ahem

    Taps microphone

    Go fuck yourself. 

    I prefer to keep things civil. But hey, if profanity or violence is your drug of choice, far be it from me to deter you. 

  5. 18 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

    No, I respect myself just fine. It's you who deserves none.

    You've also just committed another classic Republican fake centrist mistake. You think I'm a Democrat or leftist because I've pointed out your hypocrisy and lies. Unfortunately for you that's not the case.

    Gets offered to sit and have a beer and discuss issues, still accuses someone he doesn't know of a falsehood. You're right...... that's a nazi tactic. My bad. 

  6. Just now, WhatTheBuck said:

    But you're fine when the president does it. 

    No. I'm not. Not at all. Even when it's funny. (Lyin Ted cruz) 

    But a #whataboutism argument is weak. 

     

  7. 4 minutes ago, RandomIdoit said:

    I love it. But how does this prove that people are eligible to vote? And what about the people that have other constraints besides the $16 it costs to get an ID?

    Well, if you've been convicted of a felony I assume you're already on the list of "folks that can't vote".... if you've got a green card, you can do state and local, not federal, so there would have to be two lists for that...if you were born here or are a nationalized citizen you've got a birth certificate and/or other citizenship documents. Am I forgetting anything? 

  8. 3 minutes ago, Lagunamadre said:

    Social Security card will suffice, also will need banking info and credit card numbers in order to verify SS# is correct, new procedure in 2018. 

     

    On a side note, I'll be hosing a Surly happy hour at Treasures if anybody would like to join. Clob9 I'll be covering the tab. 

    Sorry man. I quit hanging out at strip clubs after I completed the Motley Crue "Girls, girls, girls" tour in my late 20s. The Body shop sucked. 

  9. 1 minute ago, Huckleberry said:

    You must have somehow missed the threads at the top of the board about

    Separation of families
    Trump's big government intervention in the market place via tariffs and handouts
    Privacy vs. Security where Republicans want to have full access to all information on all Americans
    Jim Jordan, Republican hopeful for Speaker who didn't think saying something about sexual assault was necessary
    The politically motivated arrest of Stormy Daniels

    It's truly a mystery how you only seem to miss the threads where the GOP is acting like big government goons. Bewildering, really.

    Oh wait, you found the thread about Sasha Baron Cohen's new show. I'm sure in there you pointed out all the horrific things the Republicans said. Let's go check.

    Oh no, sorry. You just complained about SBC and people trying to "get" other people. Somehow the biggest issue with Republicans saying horrific things on camera was the fact that society wants to see such things.

    You're a clown.

    Sbc tried to get Ted Coppell. Give it a rest man. Your biased attempt to try and paint me as a Republican is just as echo chamberish as the aggys that tried to paint me an a radical leftist. Their echo chamber is no better than yours. Two warring tribes and it's always the people trapped in the middle that get forced or shamed into joining sides. You're junior high peer pressure tactics don't work on me. As I said to another poster, I'd gladly sit down with you and discuss the merits of any topic over a beer if you're ever in Gruene. 

     

    Btw-- calling people names shows a lack of respect for self and others. As a Longhorn, I would expect you to be above that. 

  10. 2 minutes ago, Lagunamadre said:

    Mr. Clob, I'm actually going to need to see your government issued ID in order for you to exercise your constitutional right to express your opinion. 

    Sure thing homie. Would you prefer drivers license, passport, birth certificate social security card or any combination of the four? 

  11. 23 minutes ago, Chuckie Finster said:

    Conflating "criticism" with "suppression."  Yet another thing that centrists do all the time.  Yep.

    There have been ample opportunities on this board for you to show ANY evidence that you are a something other than a right wing apologist, and aside from saying "I'm a centrist" a thousand times, you have taken advantage of zero of them.    

    Might be time to jump to another one of your socks and try again.

    Oh, my bad. I was unaware this was your personal proving ground of political and ideological beliefs. I've commented on a whopping 4-5 issues because they are simply at the top of the board. 

     

    I will GLADLY debate with you my formula for not only providing Medicare for all, along with cutting border spending, legalizing all forms of marijuana and not only balancing our budget, but running at a surplus and starting to trim down our national debt, if you'd like to start a thread on it. 

     

    *anxiously awaiting your affirmation* 

  12. 1 hour ago, Chuckie Finster said:

    Dude, nobody is buying your bullshit.

    I was curious if I was misremembering you so I just went through your entire post history.  From Day 1 on here, your whole shtick has been "I'm a centrist, but here's why the Republicans are right."  It's annoyingly transparent and you are not fooling anyone.

    Ah I see. This is how it works on the left. Suppress others opinions when it doesn't align  with your own. That's cool man. I guess I need to scroll down and find some hot buttton postings about gay marriage and women's right to choose so I can earn my blue merit badge back. 

    • Like 2
    • Fuck You 5
  13. 2 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

    Thanks Ted.  good luck in November.

    You're welcome Bill. Now back to the gnarly phonebooth for our next awesome lesson in history!!!!! (cue the air guitar)

  14. 1 minute ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

    I would laugh about the Bolsheviks and Menshevik line because it would be so out of touch.  Which is Cruz at his finest.   At UT, I took a class that touched on Russian history, definitely their revolutions, but I don't even recall the details of the Mensheviks' philosophy.  

    Mensheviks were the labor party, in essence. Both were still Marxist or Leninist.

  15. 1 hour ago, Js1 said:

    Black Panthers - voter intimidation 

    actual government agents at voter sites to harass Hispanics - not 

    TROLL HARD

    Damn... being a centrist sucks in here. No matter what question I asked I'm pummeled by team blue or by team red. 

     

    Is this prison rules? Do I have to join a tribe to fit in? And we wonder why we are so divided as a nation. 

    • Fuck You 4
  16. 47 minutes ago, SubliminalHorn said:

    Smell that? It’s the smell of bullshit

    Sorry for the delay. Some of us sleep at night. 

    www.thenation.com/article/why-is-the-obama-administration-keeping-toddlers-behind-bars/

    http://kut.org/post/one-woman-817-children-caring-kids-undocumented-parents

    Here's two articles I found in about 2 minutes. 

     

    Frankly, I could care less if you believe what I witnessed or not. My world doesn't rise and set on your beliefs. But I know what I saw, I know what I was told, I know where I was and I know it happened. Don't be naive, children at some point, are separated from their parents when coming to this country. Some accounts were hours, some days, some longer. It's wrong, regardless of which admin is in control. There must be SOME accountability on the part of the parents. In 2014 (the year of the incident I witnessed) some children were showing up at the border without their parents. Why? Because their parents left them behind to come to the states, or sent their kids across alone. Whether done by choice or by government, children were apart from their parents. Which is worse? They both suck. 

  17. 50 minutes ago, MaybeACoordinator said:

    Even con lawyers find con law tedious. It's arguing about how many angels can fit on the head of a pin, and since when are Senators supposed to be con law specialists? They are supposed to represent their constituents, not argue over the finer points of con law like some madrassa graduates who can cite you chapter and verse of the Koran. 

    Your reductio ad absurdam speaks for itself, troll. 

    You're right. Texans don't care about the finer points of the Constitution. 

     

    (2A waves)

  18. 54 minutes ago, pyrohornIII said:

    This.  While Cruz might know a lot of trivia and legalese, probably has the ability to form arguments to persuade or defend, he isn't the one who has been out there traveling Texas for the past several months.  Beto has engaged Texans from all walks of life repeatedly.  He isn't using cambridge analytic type information to decipher what is on the minds of Texas voters.  He is talking to them and their friends and listening to what they say.   

    He has sincerity going for him.  So even if Cruz wins some technical points, Beto will be winning votes by speaking for the people. 

    PayPal bet my man. Pick your number. Money where mouth is. Can't stand Cruz but at least i can make some chedda off of biased suckers. 

    • Fuck You 1
  19. 13 minutes ago, DanRydell said:

     


    Of course it’s voter suppression. That’s the whole reason proponents of voter ID are proponents.

     

    Is driving without a driver's license considered "drivers oppression"? 

     

    What about owning a gun license? Is that considered "gun owners suppression"? 

    • Like 2
  20. 2 minutes ago, MaybeACoordinator said:

    Yeah, I am sure Con Law is first and foremost on the minds of the average Texas voter. 

    And that sucks for the average Texas voter. We are a nation of laws and the constitution and bill of rights serve as the backbone of those laws. 

     

    How can I apologize for ignorant people that know more about Kim kardashian's new cum stain removing eye cream than know about what the 4th amendment is? 

    • Fuck You 2
×
×
  • Create New...