Jump to content

lemonlime

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    3624
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by lemonlime

  1. 39 minutes ago, Mdhorn said:

    Tell it to judge that is presiding over whichever fraud cases, pretty difficult to track these days, especially with the amount of fraud your businesses commit-- should cover about anything that spews out of his pie hole.   I mean who are you gonna believe, the courts or your fraudulent mouth that's asking for diplomatic immunity for your crimes?  Which crimes do you hope to commit during another 4 year term? Geez, this is just easy.  

    Yeah, and if you're in court, you have a judge correcting the crazy person's nonsense.  There's no fact checking here.  Just a shit spewing moron who can't shut up.  Coming off well against when you're trying to argue facts and logic against shit spewing orangutan is more difficult than appearing confident and knowledgeable in a reasoned debate.

  2. 36 minutes ago, mdmost said:

    I don't believe so. I think it's the same rules as the last debate. I'm very leery about this. I know a lot of people think she'll mop the floor with him but I think it will be like Hillary's debate with him where he will be able to say and do whatever he wants. She will have emphasis placed on any times she shows anger or disgust with what he says. I'm fully prepared for the media to can't win her while letting him be the utter pig he is with no discussion about it. 

    Same.  In court, the hardest people to have on the other side of an argument are the pro se crazy people, when you're trying to steer the argument in a logical direction and they're going off on off the wall tangents on irrelevancies you never even thought of.  It's always easier to debate someone when you have an understanding of the logical things they may address.  You may win the argument when it's a judge with knowledge deciding.  But when it's just a bunch of vapid commentators and an electorate 40% of whom are in a cult, you can just come off as flailing in trying to address the inanity.  

    • Hook 'Em 2
  3.  

    10 minutes ago, Ghost of LL said:

    WTF has happened in Wisconsin?  I have thought over the last eight years that it was the least secure of the Blue Wall states.  But polling over the past six weeks has consistently had it as the most secure (occasionally showing it outside the MOE, as is the case here).  What's up with that?

    Pennsylvania is always close, but it almost always comes home for the Dems.  I suspect it'll be the same here--five points feels high.  If Harris wins it by more than three points, I'd be surprised.

    Pennsylvania is not more Dem than Michigan.  It's just not.  And I don't want to hear any bullshit about Dearborn; Harris is not going to run three points in Pennsylvania ahead of where she is in Michigan.

    After 2016, WI has elected a Dem governor (a flip from Scott Walker) and two Dem Senators and flipped the state Supreme Court to Dem control.  There was also a referendum pushed by the right, which failed a few weeks ago.

    • Hook 'Em 2
  4. No offense but this is very naive, especially with guys. Look on this site at people like Prong Horn as an example of what we're up against. They are being fed, self-selected early on, of non-stop clickbait outrage about illegal immigrants taking what's theirs, guys like Andrew Tate telling them that women are there to be their sexual servants and being an aggressive asshole is the way to get what's yours, and right wing people blaming everyone on the left for everything. Anecdotally, I hear from my daughters about the guys in their school who parrot a lot of this, some of them from families with questionable immigration status. They love Trump because he speaks to their worst desires and impulses. He's the male Id personified. Now, do they vote? God, I hope not. 

    Have you seen the polling of 18 to 29 year olds? Turnip loses bigly among them. I’m not saying he doesn’t have a significant percentage of them. He does. But every 4 years that passes it becomes a somewhat smaller percentage. Which if you’re talking about 12k votes in Georgia makes a difference. Without election fuckery he has a marginally harder road to the presidency every 4 years based on demographics
  5. You would be surprised. You think 18-22 year olds with 40 -45 year old parents who are fox news brainwashed don't exist? Lots and lots and lots of them do. The hope is the ones that do like Trump just won't show up to vote. 

    Absolutely. And they they’ve been cult members with their parents. But newer voters are still overwhelmingly dem. Each 4 years that pass make it harder for turnip. Which isn’t to say he can’t win given the ec. But he has to do more inflaming of his cult and getting cult election officials in place
    • Hook 'Em 2
  6. 2 minutes ago, BurntOrange&White said:

    2020 was definitely induced some butthole puckering until you started to see the swing states and Georgia come in....it took way longer than normal as well for that to happen which IMO added to how puckered the butthole was.

     

    I'm not saying this one is over or won't be close but leading into November as of right now it feels like it may be an easier path to presidency for democrats, especially since there isn't an incumbent. 

    I doubt there are many 18-22 year old trump voters also.  He has no room to grow his vote, he can only drum up enthusiasm among his existing cult who haven’t died in the last 4 years.

    • Hook 'Em 2
  7. 20 minutes ago, The Dog said:

    I understand this line of thinking but it also looks like the Harris team is breaking the agreement and wanting to get out of the debate. It gives Trump an opening to bail. 

    No, it doesn't. It makes Trump either admit he needs a mute button, or feed into Trump bailing on the debate.  Or to get trump to further commit to the debate.  His team could easily we want to stick to the rules agree to earlier with Biden, and I'm sure Harris would accept that.  Harris is saying she wants to change the rules, something trump could agree to or not.  And if he doesn't, then it's obvious his handlers think he needs a mute button.

    • Hook 'Em 3
    • Fuck Around and Find Out 1
  8. 4 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:

    for those that fall into his camp but having opposing views on reproductive rights, he wants to give each side just enough to believe him.

    He just says whatever pops into his pea brain the moment he says it.   He doesn't care about if it's accurate or completely inconsistent with what he said 5 minutes ago, or what he'll say 5 minutes from now.  It's all just nonsense.  And his cult will keep voting for him, no matter what he or they say.

    • Hook 'Em 5
    • Like 4
  9. 1 hour ago, Tuco said:

    I can't say I am a big fan having Harris/Walz run opposite a DNC convention.  It seems kind of shitty to whoever they are scheduled against.  On the other hand, it is kind of ballsy to fill two arenas 100 miles apart.  

    I would assume (hope?) that they'll be speaking while the roll call is going on.

    • Hook 'Em 1
×
×
  • Create New...