Jump to content

Asu2215

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    485
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Asu2215

  1. Going down on your roommate. At least in the old days.
  2. Oregon failing their B1G audition.
  3. Tell me he didn't do that on an extra point.
  4. So, it sounds like you want the top 16-24 teams in one superconference that can play it out for the big natty. If that is the case, I think we are agreement. I would say those teams should have at it and remaining 90-100 teams can go 1-AA.
  5. The NFL needs to go to the old NHL model of eight teams. If not for the fact it will give fans a reason to throw octopi?? on the field.
  6. Are you cereal? What do you want me to do with this garbage? Give me an executive summary for Christ's sake.
  7. This is not about ASU. Focus on the bigger picture. You should send a memo to the NFL. Let them know that getting rid of Pitt, Cle, Cin, Den, Sea, & KC will mean they can split the pie into less pieces. And once that works, you can move on to MLB.
  8. Actually, you are wrong. People are getting sick of the same teams playing for the natty. Logically, does it make sense to you that reducing the number of teams will increase the pool of potential pool of viewers?
  9. OSU/WSU to essentially 1-AA. Yeah, those fans are more likely to skip out on USC-Indiana and head down to the coast. And yes, I think 40 teams is absolutly worse than 75 teams. I don't want to see a landscape where BYU, Colorado, Ga Tech, and Virginia can't compete for a national championship.
  10. I have not seen many fans like this at all. Just the opposite in fact. Looks at this board. When the Horns aren't doing well you see a lot of folks going to their kids soccer games, doing yardwork, etc. Let's say OSU and WSU drop football (extreme example), some will root for UO and UW, but do you think there will be a net gain or a net loss in fans (viewership).
  11. This is where we basically disagree...There aren't going to be many casual fans who aren't already watching, say, 'I really want to watch that UCLA-Mich St game.' Sports already have a demographics problem and this won't help once the OG starts dying off. Kids today barely care about sports, let alone watching cfb.
  12. You're missing the point. Cutting out 2/3 or your market means you are going to have 2/3 or so less advertising dollars to fund this the next go round - the remaining accounts are going to be fighting over a smaller pie. There's an old saying about how you can't cut your way to profitability.
  13. So, before getting giddy as fuck, can we figure out how trimming down to 32 teams actually helps the sport? I am unaware of any other business where they say, let's reduce our TAM because we want less potential customers. And yes, you are going to lose fan interest, tv viewers, etc.
  14. Sb must be in heaven. We're here arguing about which UCLA uniform was the best.
  15. They are not even UCLA's best uniforms.
  16. I don't want MAGA types within two miles of any line of voters. I don't care what they are handing out. Same for Dems.
  17. Not sure if this is a serious question?? Second, we need to move to either a secure vote by mail or online voting process in the future.
  18. It's reasonable because it removes the potential for a perceived conflict of interest. If you can't see that then you are either unable to see how different groups can view the same situation or you are just being argumentative for the sake of it.
  19. This pertains only to political organizations providing food or water. Poll workers are free to provide food, water, etc. Seems reasonable to me.
  20. About disenfranchisement?? I can't believe you are buying into that bullshit. That being said, there needs to be some type of compromise between the two sides that provides reasonable, easy access to vote in a timely manner for all as well as election security.
×
×
  • Create New...