Jump to content

Matagorda

Legacy Members
  • Posts

    86
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Matagorda

  1. He’s going to make a ton of money if he waits one more year. We have a legit shot at CFP next year and he will be able to show case his talents. Him leaving this year woukd be like Vince leaving after the Michigan Rose. Stay a little longer LJ and then get paid s your grandkids never have to work.
  2. Thats the deal about conflict. I KNOW I never want to root for the dirt bags—it feels so wrong—- but getting to beat them twice in one year? That would feel so right!
  3. I am conflicted. Id like WV to curb stomp OU, but I would also like curb to stomp the Gooners in Jerrys world. Heart divided.
  4. I have a soft spot for the old corn aggys. Always an easy win and such.
  5. Mr. Phlegm you are a fine dude. Thanks for sharing this.
  6. So we win and WV loses to the cowboys and we are in the Championship game correct?
  7. Right, but the recipe for stopping every wide receiver this year has been weak. Boyd has been winning about 70% of his match ups. Pair them up and increase the pass rush. Our current scheme seems to allow both running and passing at will. At least stop one fully and dropping 8 hasnt done squat. So maybe sell out in stopping the run.
  8. A curb stomping would make me feel good.
  9. Players and coaches will be rightfully jacked for this game. Good job OP in laying out the implications. Last year we started using the lightening package after playing ISU. Id love to see some sort of schematic change to get more 1) pressure on the QB 2) more defenders in the box to stop the run. As it is, people can run and pass on us. Now is the time to let it all out, make changes. Go for it. Making no change to our scheme suggests the staff is being stubborn and lacks objectivity. We have a mountain of evidence our defense is failing in the current scheme. This game is against a higher level defense and we must get stops. At least trying a different scheme seems reasonable (5-2 is my personal preference given our d line/LB situation) Any scheme allowing Omenihu and Hager to rush from the outside and forcing the center and guards to account for true interior linemen, would be an improvment. As far as the secondary, have the scheme be simple—man the hell up. We are getting at least two touchdowns a game where its a simple blown assignment where freshmen forget their responsibilites as well as simply getting beat. The increased pressure on the QB from more down linemen would mean the QB would have less time to make plays. Worst case scenario? We try the scheme and they score. Thats what they have done all year long anyway and at least we tried something else.
×
×
  • Create New...