- 
                Posts2015
- 
                Joined
- 
                Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Gidnik
- 
		
- 
		3 hours ago, Big Woodrows said:Re: Arch...from an IT poster with a track record of posting sourced info: "According to my source, the recruiting staff is expecting a silent commit on or right after the visit. The recruiting staff has been wrong before, so take it fwiw." Worth noting that Gerry Hamilton "liked" this post as well. horse shit. everyone says arch wants to help build around himself. if he wants to help recruit and build around himself he is not going to silent commit. he is going to commit and start working on building around himself. - 
					
						
					
							
								 1 1
- 
					
						
					
							
								 1 1
 
- 
					
						
					
							
								
- 
		1 hour ago, notre dame joe said:Or else, they will continue to be not our type? if im the big 10 im blowing kisses at USC, and notre dame. and when notre dame says no id snag oregon, washington, and try and steal north carolina or virginia. those schools are all aau. (i find it interesting that iowa state left aau this year) 
- 
		the problem with streaming is that most of the streaming services have their customers already. theyre not going to add many customers with college football. at least not for the amount of money they are rumored to spend. 1 billion dollars divided by 9.99 a month is 100 million months of subscriptions. They may add a few games a year but theyre never going to be a major player. at least not in my opinion. 
- 
		id add in penn state and virginia tech. 
- 
		2 minutes ago, 'stache said:Wow, cool charts bro. We all know who the blue bloods are and who the next tier is, we don't need some idiot on a computer to draw it out. The new Big XII has smaller fan bases but will do fine in ratings, comfortably among the PAC and ACC. The money difference will be big. What are we arguing about again? nobody is arguing about anything. 
- 
		16 minutes ago, thunderlounge said:
 So if Texas has 7.82M fans, and the B12 has a combined 11.6M fans, looks like a 2/3 majority to me. the 11.6 is after Texas and oklahoma leave. 
- 
		
- 
		
- 
		On 6/7/2022 at 1:52 PM, Goodman said:Sure but he's been eating MRE's & taking experimental meds at an academy. He'd train like a pro here, I like his odds to take that next step here. His nutrition is far better at the afa than it will be here. 
- 
		8 minutes ago, hawkfan said:He very well might be full of shit, I've read the same from some tOSU guys that are supposedly credible (specifically with regard to USC). I don't trust much of what I read from unnamed sources, that said, it seems pretty obvious that's the path forward. Either they make a move, or Oregon/USC decide they don't really want to compete at the top level of CFB anymore with all the new NIL stuff. You can't make up $30M per year in TV money through boosters consistently, especially if you have a few down years. Again, this entire premise is built on the assumption that the Wilner article is accurate, but if it is, Oregon/USC pretty much have to leave the PAC. What other option do they have in the NIL era we're watching unfold? And I'm pretty confident TV networks would prefer the schools at the top of the P12 being in a conference with CST/EST time slots and strong viewership numbers. The biggest problem with the P12 currently is it's too many apathetic fan bases all in a shitty time slot - taking the best of the P12 and putting those schools in the B1G kind of kills two birds with one stone in that respect (blending the fan bases and time slots). I've not read the contract that Notre Dame signed with the ACC, so I don't pretend to be an expert. But to put things in perspective, they're currently getting paid about $15M per year in TV revenue from NBC (last I checked, maybe it's changed). If the B1G's new deal is somewhere in that $70M-$80M per school range as rumored, they're going to have a lot of money to work with to pay a liquidated damages for violating the contract. The schools that just left the AAC broke their GOR, perhaps it was constructed differently, but either way they settled (I know it was peanuts, but it's all relative). Most here would believe UT/OU could get out of the B12 if they had the financial incentive to do so, it's just a question of the price. You could also be correct that USC/Oregon might just leave now and the B1G makes it apparent they'll be back for more in 2035 or whenever it's financially convenient, I suppose that's possible too. I could see 18 making sense as a temporary placeholder to an eventual 20 w/ divisions - that would make sense as well. I think the only real valuable properties in the P12 from a TV standpoint are probably USC/UCLA/Oregon/Washington. aint no might to it. he doesnt know shit. everyone has been talking about usc, oregon, and washington to the big 10. - 
					
						
					
							
								 1 1
 
- 
					
						
					
							
								
- 
		43 minutes ago, hawkfan said:According to his unnamed SOURCE!: He could very well be full of shit and LARPing, but again, the math points to much of what he says being logical. I don't get expansion by 4, that's doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Just go to 20 and everything should be pretty logical and easy to pull off from a scheduling standpoint. I think you probably do need ND for the money to work at 20 though. reads like bullshit to me. 
- 
		- 
					
						
					
							
								 7 7
- 
					
						
					
							
								 2 2
 
- 
					
						
					
							
								
- 
		
- 
		Nothing about the big12 will be entertaining after us and oklahoma leave. That’s why we are leaving. 
- 
		34 minutes ago, closetohumping said:Less resistance? this. the little 8 are going to drag it out for us and oklahoma 
- 
		they dont even have a parking lot for the stadium 
- 
		UCF doesnt even have a god damn parking lot for the stadium 😂 
- 
		12 minutes ago, TrashMaster G said:Fuck the idea of playing at Houston. or cincy 
- 
		
- 
		19 hours ago, FloridaHorn said:Ok, so I am mostly disappointed by the Horns total lack of fight. This was the team I saw in Clearwater. Several times, we had kids swinging freely immediately after a walk was issued. We played defense like the softball was a hand grenade, our pitchers couldn't hit their spots, and our hitters couldn't hit their asses with both hands. It was embarrassing to watch, so I can't imaging how it felt for the players on the field. Unfortunately, only one of those groups can do anything about it. We will see tonight if they have any fight left in them or if they are just happy to be there. Did you even watch? 
- 
		8 hours ago, Rickylovesweed said:Can someone please explain to me why Ian Boyd is comparing college football to war tactics? because hes fucking stupid - 
					
						
					
							
								 2 2
 
- 
					
						
					
							
								
- 
		1 hour ago, XOVERX said:I could care less if we ever play TT again. I'm sure we will, but why? Better to play TCU, SMU, or Rice because there's at least recruiting and culture in those places. Well, there's culture in Lubbock if you miss the smell of dirt and dust in the air. dont act like youve never had the raider rash. 
- 
		32 minutes ago, Burntcowboy said:shit i got excited QuoteWith that in mind, here’s a look at what the two-deep offensive depth chart could look like for Sark and the Longhorns with the summer enrollees now on campus. 
- 
		thats a beautiful campus - 
					
						
					
							
								 1 1
 
- 
					
						
					
							
								
 
         
                






Negative Recruiting Your Own School: The aggy Screenshot Megathread
in 🤫$9.95🤫
Posted
could you imagine if this happened in todays day and age?