
SL Xpress
Full Members-
Posts
4475 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Everything posted by SL Xpress
-
I don't agree. I like the sentiment, but I don't think it's completely accurate. Texas has always thought of ourselves as pure as the driven snow. For the longest time I was extremely proud of that stance. That changed in the late 2000s as Alabama started paying trainers and coaches to bring kids to their summer camp, throwing around hundreds of uncommittable offers, paying for multiple unofficial visits to build rapport and to get them invested in the team and their incoming teammates. And of course financially compensated the players and their families for playing at Alabama. It had gone on before, but Saban industrialized it and built a recruiting strategy around it that was unparalleled in its comprehensiveness. And then, of course, everyone else followed suit, with Mack Brown sitting on his laurels, preventing assistants from going anywhere outside the Austin area during the football season, and playing the mark for Garrett Gilbert's dad. And Charlie Strong had some of the same vibes. No interactions with trainers. No paid unofficial visits. To me, negative narratives about Texas thrive because other fan bases perceive we think we're better than them. It's hard to combat something that's true. I think indifference is a more effective response. In any event, if guardrails are put up regarding student athlete compensation, the enforcement mechanisms better be robust, draconian, and swiftly applied. I do not personally believe any of those things are going to be present, which means gifted players will continue to be compensated well above their ability to bring value to a company via their endorsement, by boosters who see their real value as being able to help bring victory on the playing field for their alma mater. If Texas doesn't play ball on some level, but chooses to take a firm stand in an effort to help curtail the escalation of player compensation, then they'll pay a price in terms of success on the playing field. We're not there yet, so it's hypothetical. We'll see how everything plays out. I'm especially curious as to what would come out of Congress and/or the President. I think that's the only place that can affect some kind of solution that doesn't involve a never ending series of court cases - and even that would almost certainly result in challenges in court. But some kind of antitrust exemption especially could be handy to either the NCAA or whoever succeeds them as a governing body. I'm not saying it's a good thing. But it's tough to see how we experience anything other than a lurching chaos from now until the foreseeable future unless there's some kind of national legislation (or, I guess an executive order, since that's a big part of how we're operating as a country these days) addressing collegiate athletics.
-
Just to go back to the stupid Ohio State argument that Texas is scared to play in the Horseshoe! At night! Because more articles came up on my feed this morning, especially after Del Conte addressed it at the SEC meetings yesterday. A few points: 1) Ohio State/Big Ten agreeing to the massive television contract with Fox, CBS, and NBC is the principal issue here. Not Texas. They love to crow about how much bigger their contract is compared to everyone else. Well, the golden rule applies, boys. He who owns the gold makes the rules. Welcome to noon kickoffs, Buckeyes. Don't like it? Too bad. You signed the dotted line. No one forced you. You're the sacrificial lamb for the rest of the conference because you're the biggest draw, especially when Michigan has a down season. Tough titties. 2) Ohio State fans and Texas haters, plus click bait artists, love to project fear on Texas for not wanting to play in The Horseshoe! At night! But that's not it at all. If Ohio State was playing almost any other program, they'd readily move the game to Sunday night. Why? Because nearly every program in the country is desperate for more exposure, and would sell out living relatives to garner an exclusive prime time nationally broadcast window on a Sunday night. Forget about the consequences. But Texas doesn't need prime time exposure. We'll get plenty of prime time games this year, because we're Texas, and we're not saddled with an albatross of a television agreement with Fox like we were in the Big 12. Sucks to be you! What people are enjoying ascribing to fear, is actually arrogance. Ohio State is desperate for a prime time game at home. Texas is not desperate for prime time exposure. We don't need it. We don't have any reason to move the game to Sunday. It creates issues further down the line. So what if San Jose State is not the most fearsome opponent on the schedule. Sarkisian wants to establish the season's rhythms as soon as possible. It doesn't matter how much of a difference it makes on the win/loss schedule. Our program priority is winning a national championship. Moving the opening game to Sunday night puts us further from that goal, regardless of how much impact it has. It has some impact. How much is hypothetical, but it's also entirely unnecessary. I remember years when that wasn't the case. When the athletic department would schedule games with Hawaii simply to have an excuse to take the entire athletic department on a paid trip for them and their families, never mind the negative impact it would have on the players and team. One of the best moves Mack Brown made early on was to cancel that silly boondoggle. He got the same kind of grief about Texas being scared to play a Hawaii team that was going to be terrible after losing their entire roster. Ohio State is going to be good. They're literally always good. They don't really have down years or bad coaching hires the way everyone else does. But there's no incentive for Texas to do the Ohio State fan base any favors. "Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part." Sort your shit out with Fox. That's not our problem.
- 3335 replies
-
- 27
-
-
-
That 66-3 UCLA game in 1997 was the most miserable I've ever felt. I'm sure there have been hotter games, but sitting there in the stands because I never leave a game early felt like the most pointless gesture in the history of my most pointless gestures. And I'm a real champion for pointless gestures. On the east side, too. I felt like God's judgement was searing down on me that day.
-
Carl Torbush says, "Wow!" Edit - Already referenced.
-
Meh. There's something in our human wiring where every generation acts like that to one degree or another. The truth is that an element of ignorance is required for almost any action to take place. We have to discount what came before us to go to somewhere new. And being ignorant of the consequences of this new path is often helpful to actually taking steps towards that path. Unfortunately, sometimes that path leads to going over a cliff. But we're purposefully wired to create independence from what came before us. There is also the need to synthesize, so that happens too. I think the huge difference now is that our evolutionary methods of socialization don't work the same way any more. There have been challenges previously. When we moved from small hunter gatherer tribes subsisting on the edge of extermination in East Africa, feeding off bone marrow after the apex predators and the carrion eaters had their fill, to larger multi family tribes who shared oral traditions and passed down knowledge from one generation to the next in a way that had never been done by any other species, to larger city states with their domesticated food sources, to the invention of writing, to horses, ships, roads, and various empires, fast forward to the printing press, and the various speeds in communication. With social media we now have a world where no matter how outlandish your views, there's a community out there that shares it. We all have this push/pull of separating ourselves from a community so we can better understand who we are outside the confines of that identity, but also craving the connection and shared meaning that comes with being a part of something bigger than ourselves as an individual. With social media, no matter how toxic those views are, we can find a community that shares that same toxicity - thrives on it, even - and so we can have both. A big example, and I use it often, is there are online communities devoted to suicide. If someone googles "how can I kill myself" or other thoughts on suicide, a message board/chat room comes up in the search algorithm. In there, people ostensibly offering help, providing a sympathetic ear, are actually jockeying for who will be the person who convinces the latest victim to pull the trigger and kill themselves. This is horrific, and they know this. But they are socializing each other to engage in this activity by their shared actions. Think of it this way. Let's say 10% of the population is born with psychopathy - the innate inability to empathize with others. Raised in a certain environment, they will learn to mimic empathy, even though they don't feel it themselves, in an attempt to fit in with those around them. Here's a decent article about a neurologist who discovered he's a psychopath. He wrote a book about it. The Neuroscientist Who Discovered He Was a Psychopath Social media has "helped" us leapfrog evolutionary mechanisms to assist us in living together. We're not evolutionarily designed to live in large groups. We're evolutionarily designed to live in small groups. Say, less than 50, but probably even way less than that. We were just such a successful species we grew larger co-habitation environments, and adopted strategies to co-exist. But by and large we still have huge genocidal tendencies. We instinctually bond by identifying other enemy tribes. It's as simple as rooting for similar sports teams while hating our rivals. Or being annoyed when an android user joins a group chat and the text turns from blue to green. Or demonizing the opposing political group. What keeps that from happening to some degree is the socialization process. We resent the socialization process. It feels like it diminishes our free will by compelling us to take on the values of those around us. We feel like ants in a hive. But without a socialization process we have break downs in social order, as various tribes within a larger construct start competing with one another for resources in internecine warfare. What propels those individual tribes to form is linking together to identify common enemies. Often times extreme views can produce the most extreme loyalty to the tribe. They're identification markers. More moderate view holders tend to have a looser connection where the bonds aren't as strong. So what we're seeing with this generation as much as anything are dynamics as old as humanity itself, exacerbated by technology and the breakdown of traditional socialization techniques.
-
It's in the title of the clip. Joyeux Noel. True story. It's based on this book: Silent Night: The Story of the World War I Christmas Truce: Weintraub, Stanley: 9780452283671: Amazon.com: Books
-
Negative Recruiting Your Own School: The aggy Screenshot Megathread
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
It says there Missouri went 3-27 in SEC play. Does anyone know who those 3 wins were against and where they played? Must have won them at home, right? -
The only person in my family that I'm personally aware of who died in service was my grandfather's younger brother, George Wolgamott (even though pretty much every male in my family served in the armed services). My grandfather, Don, flew B-17s but was so good they made him an instructor and told him he was unavailable for deployment. He was too valuable as an instructor. George and Don were two of 5 brothers. Don was second youngest. George was the youngest. They also had 7 sisters. Tenant farming community in Hartford, Kansas on the border with Oklahoma. Parents immigrated from Germany. Don and George were 1st generation born in the US (along with all their brothers and sisters). Don signed up the day after Pearl Harbor. George signed up when he turned 18. George wanted to be a pilot like his older brother Don, but his eyesight wasn't 20/20 like Don's. He ended up flying a prop reconnaissance plane over enemy lines in Europe, and was shot down by the Germans. Granddad always felt like if he could have deployed, he could have saved his younger brother's life. It doesn't make realistic sense, but that's always how he felt. I wish I could have known my grand uncle and the family he never had. I had two cousins. My Dad was an only child, and my Mom had one brother. Uncle Roka had two kids. Both served in the military. The older cousin, Rocky, wanted to be a pilot like his grandfather. He ended up retiring as a warrant officer as an instructor flying Apaches. He's still flying missions in Europe as a contract employee. My younger cousin, Brodie, served in the Army, deployed mostly in Germany. Got out after his single 4 year enlistment. Every Memorial Day weekend he would make a post on social media explaining to everyone in his social circle the sacred difference between Memorial Dad and Veterans Day, and tell the story about our grand uncle George. Brodie died almost 5 years ago in a motorcycle accident at the age of 50. Every Memorial Day since then I think of George, and I also think of Brodie, who did his part to remember our family member who gave his life in defense of his country. Thank you to George and to all the brave Americans who have made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of our country regardless of conflict or even in peace time operations. This day is for you.
-
You mean forever? Is that what you mean by many moons? There is zero chance Texas is ever going to be accepted as one of them. And good. We're going to win too much. We're going to be way too arrogant about it. And at the end of the day, we really do think we're better than everyone else in this conference, and that's never going to go over well.
-
Negative Recruiting Your Own School: The aggy Screenshot Megathread
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
I don't understand how changing it from a collapsed bonfire to a collapsed dumpster fire is fixing it. -
Negative Recruiting Your Own School: The aggy Screenshot Megathread
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
"I'd run through a collapsed bonfire for Michael Earley." -
I hope Ohio State gets another 7 Big Noon kickoff games this year. It's going to be hilarious. See if Penn State will move their kickoff to a different day to make that a prime time matchup. It's the Horseshoe! At night! Hahahahaha!
-
People also underestimated how big he was. AJ Hawk, the Ohio State linebacker, said tackling Young was like tackling a tree trunk. I remember watching him in high school and defenders just bounced off him. When Vince was behind the line of scrimmage looking to throw downfield he acted as if opposing players weren't even there. If he ever happened to get sacked it literally looked like a tree falling down, with Vince looking baffled as if this could ever even happen.
-
Bruce Feldman had a recent article for The Athletic where he rated Vince Young the #7 rated player overall of the 2000s. He had Cam Newton and Reggie Bush as #1 and #2. Kirk Bohls sent him a thumbs up emoticon. No Colt McCoy anywhere on the list. It seems crazy to say, but Vince Young is underrated nationally for how good he was. The best player I've ever seen. Better than Earl Campbell, high school and college, and I don't say that lightly. I say that to emphasize how unbelievable he was. What he did with Madison HS his senior year shouldn't have been possible. Even his first year in the NFL was incredible, until poor personal decisions and playing for Jeff Fisher caught up with him. But he had a sensational second half of a season that year after Fisher let him take over the starting role. What could have been. Ah well. I cherish all the memories I have.
-
Where is Trev Alberts on here?
-
Texas Basketball Recruiting Notes: It's Miller Time
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
Dia Bell's younger brother is a top prospect, too, although he's only a freshman right now. Apparently Raja Bell LOVES Sean Miller. -
Texas Recruiting Notes 2026: Boulevard of Broken Bagmen
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
I know what you're saying. It's going to be harder to involve the running backs in the passing game when every deep ball Arch throws goes for a touchdown. And don't talk to me about incompletions or interceptions. There will be none of that. Maybe they can catch a pass every now and then on a wheel route deep down field on a mismatch with a linebacker. -
Texas Recruiting Notes 2026: Boulevard of Broken Bagmen
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
You are very declarative about things that are hardly set in stone. I'm not saying you're wrong. I have not watched either player. I'm saying that what the tape is telling you is not as certain about determining what kind of player they are in college as you make it sound. That said, the staff isn't always going to be correct in their evaluations, and at the least I admire and appreciate your willingness to constantly form your own opinion, regardless about how right or wrong that opinion ends up being. -
Jordan Scruggs from Horns247 extensively quotes his trainer, Bernard "Bam" Blake, on what kind of player Texas is getting. I'll be honest. I don't worry about whether Texas hits on every recruitment. Not every kid has to be a 5 star - nor can they be. What I get concerned with is if Texas is filling up with players who are not as highly touted because they're trying to build momentum, they can't successfully recruit the more talented athletes, or they're too lazy to do the work to go outside the immediate area to identify the highest level of talent. None of those three things describe this staff. The worse thing I could speculate about this recruitment is they're trying to maintain tight relations with Blake, but given his track record with DBs, including Taafe, Barron, and Mukuba, that's not the worst thing in the world to happen. They decided this kid would be a good fit. Whatever role he plays - and for all I know he's a multiple year AA - he seems like he'll be an amazing culture fit. I'm excited to see how he develops. Here's the article Scruggs wrote quoting Blake: Texas lands Austin Anderson three-star safety Yaheim "Miami" Riley
-
I mean, Texas could get one from Anderson every year if they wanted.
-
Sub-Educated Cretins: The SEC screenshot mega-thread
SL Xpress replied to SimkinsMan's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
Every orifice, really. -
Negative Recruiting Your Own School: The aggy Screenshot Megathread
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
So 60% of their history isn't considered "much" in your opinion? Are you saying that period didn't have an impact on their current culture? I don't think I'm understanding your point. -
Negative Recruiting Your Own School: The aggy Screenshot Megathread
SL Xpress replied to texifornia's topic in 🤫$9.95🤫
I spent a great deal of time on the NC State message boards for a few years in the late 1990s. I started there by researching Mack Brown, and ended up staying because they were hilarious. But the way they viewed UNC struck me as very similar to how A&M views Texas. And the way they perceived UNC viewed them was exactly how I felt I perceived A&M. It's actually quite a common dynamic among flagship versus land grant schools. Michigan and Michigan State certainly have a lot of it. The difference is that A&M was an all male compulsory ROTC school for much of its history, and because of that its cultural foundations are very odd. -
Well, the biggest reasons are two fold. They are just a really weird bunch with a ton of entertaining cognitive dissonances. We talk about them so much because they're so much fun to talk about. They give us so much material. Every. Day. Sooners...not as much. The second reason is they're so damn many of them these days, and we encounter Aggies more regularly in our daily lives. And any time you mention Texas to any of them, they so often manage to slide in a disparaging remark even if you've never met them before. So over the years it has become more personal. In the 70s, we hardly even thought about Aggie. They were a smallish student body just beginning to integrate. Not people of color. I'm unconvinced they've ever been that awesome in that regard. People with vaginas. With a 70,000 student body pumping out diploma mill graduates, I can't even get away from them if I wanted to in Houston these days. I know there are more Sooners in the DFW area, but in Houston they're practically non existent. There are way more LSU fans here than Sooner fans.
Football ... Basketball ... Baseball ... Other Sports ... Futbol ... 🤫995🤫 ... Gambling ... Movies & TV ... Music ... Hobbies ... Lulz ... Food & Travel ... Daily Texan ... Business and Markets ... Cloak Room ... Help ... For Sale ... Board Discussion ... Subscribe!... Donate!... COOKIE MONSTER!