Jump to content

William Bludworth

Burnt Ends
  • Posts

    27513
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by William Bludworth

  1. Bro, I wanted VY to win it, obviously, but look at how many Heisman winners pad their stats over shit teams. Had the Heisman been given after the NC, which logic dictates it should be, VY would have it unanimously. But regular season? VY had 26-10 passing TD's. That's uh, not great. He did, however, have over 1k rushing, which is great, and 37 overall TD's, but again, that's good, but not great. Leinart in 2004 had 3300-33-6 Bush in 2005 had 1700 rushing yard with 16 TD's @ 8.7 ypc. That's phenomenal. He also had almost 500 receiving and 2 TDs. He also had a punt return for a td. Washington was the only team to hold him under 80 yards. VY had six games where he his pass % was less than 60%. I do not blame the committee for awarding Bush the Heisman. Stop being a Homer and go look at stats. Had the Heisman been awarded after NC, VY would have it, no questions. But, he doesn't. It is what it is. As you grow older and look at each players stats, you can clearly see why Bush won it.
  2. Yep. Those dudes are killers. Well coached. I'll be pulling for them.
  3. Right???? You would think at least ONE would be bangable
  4. Bro.......Indiana is better than us. Womp Womp Womp. Anyway, at least those buckeye fuckers took that loss like the pussies they are
  5. Reggie did also deserve it, and I want to be unbiased. Both he and VY deserved it, but it is what it is. But yeah, Mendoza absolutely deserves the Heisman. He's so much better than Pavia as a QB
  6. I really like that Becker dude. We should, uh, go steal him.
  7. Aggy sucks, no contest there, but....if those two were on our team, they would be the second best WR duo behind Smith and Tate, imo; they just unfortunately have Reed as a QB, but they've made him look so, so much better than he is. Once we took away the pass game, Reed was inert, Owens sucks, but EJ Smith is weirdly much better than Owens. Owens has always sucked, and it showed with his 3.owens ypc. Smith averaged 6.8 ypc. Had they actually used him properly, who knows how much better he could have gotten. He's the only reason they have 17 instead of 10 points. His moves are what I wish Baxter could do. Is that a product of our DL? Possibly. But the probability is low since we held Owens and Reed in check. I dunno. There's something different about Emmitt's kid. I bet he plays in the NFL for at least 6 years, which would be 4 more than Owens. Anyway, their WR's are good, I'm not gonna go full hate-tard just because they're aggys. Had they had Arch throwing to them (late year Arch) they would have been destroying teams. Wingo is fine, he's just an athlete playing WR, and I like Mosley. Moore seems to have regressed. But we do have McCutcheon who will be so much better. My point being is, as much as I hate the Harvard on the Brazos tards, their WR corps is miles better than ours, loss or not.
  8. What are the launch codes, because you're about to need them.
  9. Man, both Concepcion and Craver are absolute studs and we held them in check for most of the game. And I agree, I would take either over Bernard or Williams
  10. We would come off the top ropes against Bama. I couldn't agree more. 100%!
  11. Like I said— if you make the CCG and get blown out by more than 10 points, it should count against you. Why? Because if you make it, regardless of how (back door? Ou anybody?) and you get your doors blown off, that should count. It means you weren't truly worthy.
  12. Man, this is one of those arguments that's hard to defend against. Should they? Objectively speaking? Yes. Subjectively? No. Why? They played all of their healthy players because they have two losses and still lost by 3 TD's. However, if you still make the CCG and lose by more than 10 points, that loss should count against you.
  13. Concur. They're nothing more than upsets and honestly shouldn't count. Will they? Yep. Should they? No. Why? Because upsets happen. That doesn'tean said team is good or bad. That same team would lose 9/10 times.
  14. Aggy in 2021 or something has to be added. Does that mean they're "competitive?" Sure, I guess. Does that mean they should be in the CFP? Fuck no.
  15. Agree 100%, they should absolutely have their own subdivision. They are not equipped to handle a p4/5 team regularly.
  16. I couldn't agree more with every word you posted. 100%.
  17. Nah, Bama is in no matter what. Sure, they lost by 3 TD'S, but they "earned" the right to play for a CCG. Does that matter to us? Yes. Does it matter to is picking what team? No. Not at all.
  18. It's a sham that ND and Miami will both be in, but never mind neither have played a team with a pulse, other than ND getting robbed at home by ref fuckery. But whatever. Fuck all the teams ahead of us.
  19. I can't remember who started it, but an NIT for G5 should be a thing. If they want to add a NC to their record for winning said tourney,go for it.
  20. I don't know about top 5, but we're definitely a top 10 team who should be in.
  21. They're definitely in, but it needs to go. No G5 team will ever, and I mean forever, get close to winning it all. It's taking away a spot for a legit team that's on the same level (recruiting) as another team. If the G5 modlel didn't exist, we're in. No doubt about it.
×
×
  • Create New...