-
Posts
5856 -
Joined
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Downloads
Recruiting - 2020
2019-2020 Football Season
Football
Entertainment
Sports
News and Business
Cloak Room
Transfer Portal
Recruiting
Events
Posts posted by Ghost of LL
-
-
And thank you, Aaron Rodgers, for demonstrating that no rational person could think Texas doesn't deserve to be in the CFP and that the only reason one would argue otherwise is a manic hatred of the Longhorns.
- 5
- 1
-
2 hours ago, InkaUtexas said:
One thing to consider is Guyana is a Commonwealth Member. Would take some balls to invade a member.
That didn't really bother us when we invaded Grenada.
-
1 hour ago, Ken Griffey Jr said:
All the dead Ukrainians? Decimation of their country? I certainly do get the cynical view that rubblizing and rebuilding parts of Ukraine will make some people money. There’s always unintended consequences though.
Look what’s happening to Germany. Vast deindustrialization. They’ll be moving to rust belt status in the future. How will that be handled by their population? Not well, I’m guessing. And I’m no saying I know how that could’ve been prevented, but a lot of this thread is Go Team! without even knowing if it’s true or what will be the fallout.
In terms of manpower yes, but they’ve been battle tested in the new ways of war and ramped their spend significantly.
Battle doesn't harden an army that suffers the casualties that the Russian Army has suffered. Would you say that the United States Army was "battle tested" in 1974? Fuck no, you wouldn't. The United States Army in 1974 was severely degraded, and that's after having suffered 50,000 dead in ten years, not 70,000 in 20 months.
The Ukrainian Army is also battle degraded. And the Ukrainian nation is suffering mightily. Their interest is for this war to successfully end at the earliest possible time. So from that standpoint, the interests of Ukraine diverge somewhat from the interests of the United States.
- 5
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
The very best thing that can be said about Russia's current status is that it is not losing strategically significant territory and it may make marginal gains from time to time. But overall the front could properly be characterized as "static."
And from an American standpoint, that's fine. I know a lot of people are emotionally invested in Ukraine and fervently hope that the Ukrainians will be able to expel the invaders from the whole of its territory. But speaking purely of America's interests here and being completely dispassionate, the current status quo benefits us more than an unequivocal Ukrainian victory would.
Right now, while Russia is bogged down in Ukraine, it is unable to threaten any of our Nato allies. Even the Baltic countries, which the Pentagon has always worried could not be readily defended in the event of an invasion, now face no realistic threat from Russia.
An end to the war would mean that Russia would have a chance to rebuild and replenish its military. But for now, it has to increase its budget just to keep up with the stocks it is losing on a daily basis to the Ukrainians. Russia is militarily weaker than it was in January 2022, and that decline is continuing.
And the decline isn't just military. It's economic and diplomatic. The sanctions haven't had the crushing effect for which one might have hoped. But they've had an effect all the same. The Russian economy is stagnant; inflation is high. That's right, friends--it's the Fed's great fear: stagflation. And there's not a damned thing the central bank can do about it. Russia certainly can't sell weapons on the international market; nobody wants their garbage.
At the same time, Russia's military ineffectiveness means its diplomatic stature is decreasing. Everywhere from Kazakhstan to Armenia, its former satellites are exerting their independence. And maybe once upon a time, someone might have given a fuck about Russia's position on Gaza or Venezuela; now, nobody does.
All of Russia's losses have worked to the benefit of the United States. Russia's losses in the international arms market are being picked up by American manufacturers. Russia's diminishing diplomatic stature has been filled by an increased American role in the Caucasus and Central Asia. American O&G producers are making up for the loss of Russian hydrocarbons on the international market. America's allies are finally realizing that they need to contribute to allied defense.
And all this is being accomplished at virtually no cost. The United States spends money that . . . goes to American defense contractors. We get a jobs program; Russia gets dead people.
Why would we want this to stop?
And I think the answer from the position of the United States Government is, "we don't."
So, yeah, @Ken Griffey Jr--Russia is doing just great. As an American, I kind of hope Russia keeps doing this great indefinitely.
- 18
- 3
- 1
- 1
-
1 hour ago, InkaUtexas said:
And there is also Colombia. They do not like the government in Venezuela and have a pretty good military that is not that active right now.
Concerning the Brits. They maintain Jungle training centers in Kenya and in Belize. I bet they could conduct a defensive action pretty damn well.
Probably the best deterrent would be a massive "training" event in Guyana with the US, UK, Brazil and maybe Canada. A show of force, build a training facility.
I don't love that, because then the Venezuelans will frame their aggression as being a reaction to Anglo-American imperialism in the form of a base being built on Venezuela's borders. And while that may be bullshit, it'd gain a lot of traction around Latin America and undermine our ability to build a broader CONMEBOL coalition to counter the Venezuelan aggression.
It'd be far better to let the Brazilians take the lead. And to the extent Brazil needs support, we can provide that covertly.
- 3
-
- Popular Post
-
14 minutes ago, Nice Guy Eddie said:
In a perfect world, the UK should be enforcing Guyana's borders since they were the ones who supposedly settled the issue with Venezuela prior to British Guyana going independent. Early 60s? But I doubt the UK is in any position to do much of anything that doesn't involved their current territories.
Where does the other South American powers stand on this issue? Does Brazil have an interest in helping their neighbors maintain their borders?
The UK does have the ability to project power . . . or at least enough power as would be necessary to fight off Venezuela. The Royal Navy has two active carriers, each of which has more than enough combat capability to destroy the Venezuelan Air Force is pretty short order. The challenge, then, is ground support in a jungle environment against a non-mechanized adversary. And as the USAF demonstrated in Vietnam, that presents some challenges.
That's where the Brazilian ground forces come in. And yeah--they do have an interest there. As the Fish points out above, Brazil has a strong interest in keeping their road through Guyana to the Caribbean ports open. And yeah--it is their road. It was built with Brazilian money and serves primarily Brazilian interests. It's the same way it's "our Canal," irrespective of Panamanian sovereignty.
But beyond that, there's some regional dick swinging that comes into play here. Brazil sees itself as the regional hegemon. And if you're the regional hegemon, you don't take too kindly to one of the subordinate powers trying to upset the regional status quo without your pre-approval. That's just not how this works. So Brazil has an interest in putting Venezuela back in its place and demonstrating to the rest of CONMEBOL that shit can't go down in South America without Brasilia's say-so.
- 3
-
- Popular Post
I haven’t thought about aggy all weekend. But then I see this thread and, oh it’s so good when it touches your lips.
- 5
- 5
- 8
-
With all the talk of not just Texas, but also SMU (which is in the discussion for a January 1 bowl) having OU as a very good loss, I’m starting to wonder whether OU is going to get into the playoffs.
-
1 minute ago, WBT said:
Walk me through it. I think if Georgia loses, Michigan as #1 seed chooses the Rose and #2 seed Washington plays #3 Texas in the Sugar.
There’s no choosing. The 2 and 3 seeds play in the Rose.
I’m counting on Georgia and FSU losing.
-
That’s it—I’m pulling the trigger on Rose Bowl tickets.
- 2
- 1
- 1
-
3 minutes ago, texastroubadour said:
No run game
This post aged poorly.
- 4
- 2
-
So Many Commercials.
- 1
-
I have absolutely no clue who this rando is.
-
2 minutes ago, mdleast said:
This college football season has been incredibly fun, and PAC 12 After Dark has been a big part of that. I’m really going to miss this conference.
- 1
- 2
-
Have we reached a consensus on whom we’re cheering for here?
-
2 hours ago, dcar00 said:
they deserve all this. could have held the Big 12 together but LHN, LHN.
I bet they'd trade LHN for the wasteland they are now.
Yeah, and I think this is worth remembering as we continue to hear whining and complaining about Texas from the Irate8. It was Nebraska that destroyed the Big 12 when they decided they were sick of losing to Texas. It was a petulent little baby temper tantrum that sowed the seeds of the conference's destruction and ultimately cratered their own program.
- 8
-
6 minutes ago, shadow_operative2.0 said:
LHN
Virtually every home game/match of those 4 sports is on there.
But to that point, the Big12 CG is an ESPN property. It could easily simulcast the game on LHN if it so chose.
-
4 hours ago, jdhorn92 said:
Have you seen the movie Railway Man? Thoroughly enjoyed it, though given your depth of knowledge on the subject matter, it may have been too dramatized.
I hadn't seen that, but that looks good.
-
1 hour ago, Chad Fuck said:
How do you know so much about Russian railroads, Oleg?
I kind of weirdly like trains, as some of you have noticed from my occasional spats with @Spankytoes on various European travel treads in which he advocates for flying between European cities and I favor taking the train (including overnight trains, which are seeing a major resurgence across Europe). And one train-centric trip I have toyed with taking from time to time is the Trans-Siberian.
Tangentially, there is a very peculiar subset of train nerds out there who have taken the BAM. There are a number of videos on YouTube. And on that line, the primary tourist attractions are the stops at largely deserted Soviet-era towns that were originally built and settled for the workers that built the BAM. The Soviet expectation was that those towns would be further populated by people coming to work in nearby coal mines and other industries that would pop up along the BAM. But with the fall of the Soviet Union, those enterprises never materialized. And the workers who were there to build the railway left. So you have these deserted Soviet towns that are kind of similar to what you will see in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone. So you can go and see that without getting all radioactive.
By the way--one of those videos is from that delightful Englishman whose videos about Donbas were posted on this thread about a thousand pages ago. It's really an interesting watch.
- 5
- 1
- 1
-
10 minutes ago, kevwun said:
I'm guessing that will create a nice bottleneck of rail shipments between Russia and China so it was worth the effort. If the tunnel itself was compromised by the explosion, it will be closed for a long time.
The BAM is a real interesting piece of late-Soviet era planning. The purpose was to create a line parallel to the Trans-Siberian further away from the border with China for obvious strategic reasons. For much of its length, the Trans-Siberian runs just a few miles from the Chinese border, which is a real problem given the tension of Sino-Soviet relations.
The entire thing was a shitshow from the beginning. The Soviets sent a bunch of workers out to new towns that didn't have electricity or running water (many of which are now abandoned). And the permafrost on which the line is built is now thawing, which is going to destroy the entire line in the next decade.
The tunnel that was attacked took nearly 30 years to complete. So if it was structurally compromised, that's not going to be an easy fix. It runs a mile underground and is 10 miles long. But here's the thing--there is an old bypass line that they used on the BAM during construction of that tunnel. I don't know what kind of shape it's in, but it'd obviously be a lot quicker to bring that into operation. And, of course, there's always the Trans-Siberian.
So on balance, I don't think it's that big of a catastrophe.
- 5
-
2 minutes ago, Captainant said:
Real median household income in the US is just about at $75k/yr
https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2023/demo/p60-279.html
Knock off a third of that to cover taxes if you're looking at around $53k left in take home pay. Median mortgage payment is right around $2k/mo right now. That's at least $24k gone before you even get to insurance, PMI, HOA costs, and utility costs. Count in a car or transportation costs for work, and you're looking at way south of $20k/yr left over for food, clothing, kids, and everything else.
That's not much money these days my man. Sure if you zoom out far enough and look at enough sythnetic metrics it looks peachy - and it definitely us in a top income bracket! - but the reality isn't so nice for most of everyone else.
And what I'm saying is that that's still better than it was five years ago. Or ten years ago. Or certainly 20 years ago. The economy is performing well for everyone.
-
11 hours ago, Captainant said:
I think you're mixing signals here. Average/median wage earners haven't really gotten a pay bump AND inflation continues to eat away at savings. """The economy""" doing well means the stock market is doing well, which means top earners are doing well. There's a whole shitload of folks left behind in those statistics, and most don't have the stability to jump between jobs and hope for better wages without worry of getting evicted because they can't pay rent because they're waiting for a management job.
On that note, id betcha a dollar the reason mortgage delinquency rates are down is because of the massive growth of investment home loans. Investors aren't gonna welch on their principal payments - it's mostly homeowners at the end of their rope going delinquent.
The statistics don't bear that out. Wages are increasing at a >5% clip this year; inflation is at 3.2%. Wage growth has exceeded inflation throughout 2023.
I'm sorry, man, but this is entirely a case of "feels" and misinformation. The truth is that the economy is great. For everyone. And particularly for those at the bottom of the wage scale. Arguing otherwise is to ignore every measure of objective reality.
- 8
-
2 minutes ago, Thetexashammer said:
Obviously.
Well, I don’t think it is very funny.
Русский корабль - иди нахуй
in Daily Texan
Posted
Is it really your contention that the Russian military is stronger today than it was on February 1, 2022?
Are you contending that the Russian military is comparatively stronger vis-a-vis Nato than it was on February 1, 2022?
And to the extent you're contending that the Russian military is stronger either in absolute or comparative terms, on what evidence are you basing that? When you say "they've had to adapt to this new kind of warfare," what evidence of such adaptation are you seeing? Where have those adaptations been successful? Because Russia's war aim continues to be the conquest of Ukraine. But for 20 months, they haven't had any meaningful gains. That doesn't reflect any successful adaptation to me.
The reality for any objective observer is that this war is weakening Russia in every way. Russia may not be losing. But it's not winning.
And for Russia, that is losing.