Jump to content

Rex Kramer

Full Members
  • Posts

    624
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rex Kramer

  1. 29 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

    I don't really disagree with any of this. He shouldn't have done what he did, it is obviously threatening and hostile behavior. At best, it's an incredibly stupid thing to do for any number of reasons, at worst it's pointing out "I know where you live" to someone as a direct threat.

    The question is how do you respond to such a threat? I would personally feel more strongly about it if a written threat was actually made in the note, but it doesn't seem like that was the case. A list of demands and a plea for dialogue doesn't really move the needle any further for me. It actually moves it backward a little for me because it indicates, at least to me, that he's just a stupid college kid that decided to try and make himself heard in one of the dumbest possible ways rather than someone who would actually try to harm someone.

    I've quite literally had strangers come up to my house and yell at my goddamn doorbell camera in the middle of the night before (sorry Rex's mom, I just don't love you anymore), but I never felt the need to call the cops on them or pull a gun on them, so what does that leave us? Despite the attempts to characterize it as a home invasion, it clearly was not and I doubt any laws were even broken. So again, where does that leave us?

    It leaves us with you still needing to fuck off back to CR. Take those pederasts bolverk and wildcat with ya. My mom passed in ‘00, you cunt. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Haha 2
    • Fuck You 1
  2. 9 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

    For Christ’s sake, @Willfully Horn, read the letter. There was no threat, veiled or otherwise. The letter laid out basic “demands” of a protest movement and suggested “further dialogue.”

    You’re too smart to fall for the paranoid fantasies of the DT pants-wetter brigade.  

    Lulz. Nobody wets pants. This is criminal behavior by a guy wearing a mask at 5 am. Nobody in their right mind would condone this. Are you of ill mind or are you a deliberate contrarian?  Obviously you’re not married and have no kids. 

    • Hook 'Em 5
  3. 11 minutes ago, Willfully Horn said:

    I read CR, and have read many 956 posts there. His posts benefit the board.

    Not sure of the distinction you are making, I guess. Would it help if I said that I would feel threatened by folks at my door in the early morning?
     

    As I have posted, this happened, when a neighboring couple brought their marital spat through my front door around 1AM, and I threw the husband out of my house, while the ladies in my family tended the wife. No guns were used.

    Yes it helps. It’d also help if you admonished idiotic takes like those of bolverk, Fantana, F250, and Hank Hill, instead of remaining silent because you otherwise agree with them. 

    And no, what occurred to you is not apples to apples. 

  4. 13 minutes ago, Skipper said:

    It's pretty fucking embarrassing that the Cloak Room regulars are trying to fucking justify or play down this type of idiocy.  It's beyond unacceptable.   I'm sure they would have the exact same "no big deal" opinion if it were MAGA idiots showing up harassing D appointed judges or similar.

    Absolutely. It defies logic. Blatantly hypocritical and those CR lefties that disagree with them, who are probably great in number, are silent on this. 

    The silence from some verbose, bombastic CR regulars is deafening. 

    • Hook 'Em 2
  5. Just now, Brian Fantana said:

    Don't you think this is just projection?

    Yeah probably. I feel an outspoken Hamas sympathizer is superior to me, and am gay for  a goalpost-moving, narrative-stretching bleeding heart twink. You got me!

    2 minutes ago, bolverk said:

    But essentially, he wasn't doing anything wrong by dropping off his weighty tome. This would be a non-story without the Ring snapshot.

    I hope you don’t have children you absolute moron. 

  6. 2 minutes ago, BrickHorn said:

    Holy shit, just catching up on the Masked Intruder and his SCARY THREATENING NOTE that was exactly like one of those subtle mafioso threats you see in the movies and is probably exactly how real life college aged protesters work. 

    Anyway, a big thanks to all you paranoid dorks for the lulz this morning. 

    Dismissive partisan twat.

    1 minute ago, Captainant said:

    It's one of those funny contradictions where the protesters are simultaneously weak and feeble, but also a dangerous threat

    Exactly like Palestinian leadership and operatives. 

    1 minute ago, Brian Fantana said:

    I mean, let's be real, this weirdo showing up at someone's house at 4AM, harming no one and leaving a note is just proof positive that no one is safe from Hamas. This is like Oct. 7 all over again!!!!!!!

    You people are herpes. 

    • Hook 'Em 3
  7. 8 hours ago, Hook1997 said:

    Everyone defending dumbasses on both sides of this are pushing a motive against the other side….   There’s no justification for either’s dumbass behavior.  And yes a few of y’all have done it for either side.    Who would have thought 20 years ago this country was working way more together vs today.  Everyone thought it was bad then, they had no clue what was coming.  I’m sorry is that considered political?  This whole thread is….  

    This isn’t a both sides deal. This is nutjob losers on one side doing inappropriate shit and sometimes illegal shit. They are ugly nerds that should be ridiculed, kicked out of school when warranted, and never find gainful employment by any respectable outfit.

    1 hour ago, BabaYaga said:

    Fucking this.  That anyone could even attempt to defend this has a broken, partisan brain.  

    Yes. But bolverk, whose posting history in this thread has been atrocious, and F250 are going to great lengths to dismiss the severity of the guy’s actions. 

    33 minutes ago, Bevo said:

    I’d ask him to stay and call the police and have him arrested for trespassing and disturbing the peace and then get him kicked out of school. I’m sure there is something in the code of conduct about harassing and threatening teachers and administrators.

    Absolutely. 

    27 minutes ago, BabaYaga said:

    It wasn't (nor was the regent claiming) a home invasion.  It wasn't really trespassing either.  It was a thinly veiled threat as stated that we know where you live.  This is the scene in the movie when the mobsters come into the store and tell the owner "nice place, be a shame if something happened to it"

    It was fucking trespassing dude. 

    • Hook 'Em 2
  8. 39 minutes ago, PRONG HORN said:

     

     

    The book having two reasonably attractive young people on the cover isn't by design at all I'm sure.  

     

     

     

     

    Hamas is known for blue eyed gals dude. Cmon. 

    35 minutes ago, bolverk said:
    54 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

     

    Pronghorn is not here to inform the board about current events involving protests or protesters. In fact, he's admitted as much that his primary reason for posting in this thread is to spread propaganda.

    He is PRECISELY informing the board of current events. You just don’t like that these protestors are batshit crazy. 

     

    2 hours ago, F250 said:

    That dudes tweet did come off like a Karen post on Nextdoor. "My children were asleep and this intruder left a letter on my door thinking he is Martin Luther with his Ninety Five Theses and shit."

    I’’d have tweeted simply that some masked idiot came by my door at 4 am and this is not okay. On what fucking planet do you live where it is acceptable that a student (I guess) that is misguided as fuck comes to a regent’s home?  Fucking looney tunes man 

    • Hook 'Em 2
    • Like 2
  9. 16 minutes ago, Fondren & Main said:

    Surlyhorns, our opinions matter and change the world!  😂 

    image.gif.741944642bff0487380a68495a259250.gif

    7 minutes ago, Hank_Hill said:

    Well no. I’m speaking to the suggestion of “raw video” from twitter not being useful for disinformation as laughable. Regardless of which side is posting it. 

    It’s only a useful disinformation tool with context. If there’s a caption that states people were carrying ISIS flags, it’s the text written by the disseminator that is the disinformation. 

    When Prong was posting videos that didn’t contain disinfo, but getting roughed up for the messengers, that was bullshit. The videos he was posting, by and large, were not disinfo instruments. 

    • Hook 'Em 2
  10. Just now, Foosters said:

    The law surrounding first amendment protections for gov't employees is. Which is what you have been arguing against all day.

    This is pretty cut and dried. Sounds like there’s a group of y’all willing to battle UT on this homeless looking dude’s behalf, like you’d envy being in that position. I strongly suspect the facts of any case law you link and the facts from Ol’ Dick are night and day. But by all means, continue to speak on how complicated it is. 

  11. 1 hour ago, Foosters said:

    The conversation everyone else was having involved the first amendment's applicability when it comes to public employees, and how the analysis is different in regard to public vs. private employers.

    Why you repeatedly responded with certainty to posts NOT discussing whether Heynan will prevail is curious.

    Let me give you an example to help you understand:

    "Well, the patient has been shot through the abdomen, and the procedure is complicated and risky. The chances of survival will depend largely on what we find during surgery."

    "LOL doc, that's completely retarded and you're wrong. I'll bet you he survives."

    "Ok?"

    Terrible analogy. His firing isn’t complicated. 

  12. 6 minutes ago, Foosters said:

    On what? That's its not a complicated issue with nuances in case law? 

    Or is your position that if this employee does not prevail in a lawsuit, that proves that the law is straightforward?

    How many weird hills a week do you die on?

    That Heynan will not prevail for a multitude of reasons. 

    4 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

    Lulz.  You're letting a message board push you farther right.  Way to stand your ground, Chomsky.

    Not really. That’d be society. Of which Surly is a part. 

  13. 5 minutes ago, jimmyjazz said:

    Right.  You're a far-right piece of shit.  We already knew that, but at least you're consistent.

    The irony of a simp like you wading into a legitimate discussion and flinging poo is not lost on anyone.

    You can call me far right if you’d like. I’m very anti Trump. The current environment, which includes this Board, is pushing me further and further right at a good pace. 

     

    6 minutes ago, Foosters said:

    You off your meds or something?

    There's a shitload of case law on this issue. 

    Happy to wager you too. 

×
×
  • Create New...